14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An Update on Drugs Used for Lumbosacral Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia in Dogs

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This review aims to report an update on drugs administered into the epidural space for anesthesia and analgesia in dogs, describing their potential advantages and disadvantages in the clinical setting. Databases searched include Pubmed, Google scholar, and CAB abstracts. Benefits of administering local anesthetics, opioids, and alpha 2 agonists into the epidural space include the use of lower doses of general anesthetics (anesthetic “sparing” effect), perioperative analgesia, and reduced side effects associated with systemic administration of drugs. However, the potential for cardiorespiratory compromise, neurotoxicity, and other adverse effects should be considered when using the epidural route of administration. When these variables are considered, the epidural technique is useful as a complementary method of anesthesia for preventive and postoperative analgesia and/or as part of a balanced anesthesia technique.

          Related collections

          Most cited references139

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis.

          Whether epidural analgesia is a better method than parenteral opioids for postoperative pain control remains controversial. To systematically review the efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia vs parenteral opioids, the primary alternative technique. Studies were identified primarily by searching the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database (1966 to April 25, 2002) and other sources for studies related to postoperative epidural analgesia. Inclusion criteria were a comparison of epidural therapy vs parenteral opioids for postoperative analgesia, measurement of pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) or numeric rating scale, randomization of patients to either therapy, and adult patients (> or =18 years). A total of 1404 abstracts were identified, 100 of which met all inclusion criteria. Each article was reviewed and data extracted from tables, text, or extrapolated from figures as needed. Weighted mean pain scores, weighted mean differences in pain score, and weighted incidences of complications were determined by using a fixed-effect model. Epidural analgesia provided better postoperative analgesia compared with parenteral opioids (mean [SE], 19.40 mm [0.17] vs 29.40 mm [0.20] on the VAS; P<.001). When analyzed by postoperative day, epidural analgesia was better than parenteral opioids on each postoperative day (P<.001 for each day after surgery). For all types of surgery and pain assessments, all forms of epidural analgesia provided significantly better postoperative analgesia compared with parenteral opioid analgesia (P<.001 for all), with the exception of thoracic epidural analgesia vs opioids for rest pain after thoracic surgery (weighted mean difference, 0.6 mm; 95% confidence interval, -0.3 to 1.5 mm; P =.12). The complication rates were lower than expected for nausea or vomiting and pruritus but comparable with existing data for lower extremity motor block. Epidural analgesia, regardless of analgesic agent, location of catheter placement, and type and time of pain assessment, provided better postoperative analgesia compared with parenteral opioids.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Intrathecal and epidural administration of opioids.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use and efficacy of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute postoperative pain: a review of current techniques and outcomes.

              Ketamine hydrochloride is a well known general anesthetic and short acting analgesic in use for almost 3 decades. The role of the NMDA receptor in the processing of nociceptive input has led naturally to renewed clinical interest in N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists such as ketamine. This paper reviews the use and efficacy of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute postoperative pain. The literature was obtained from a computer search of the MEDLINE database from 1966 through December 1998. Studies were included for review if they were randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blind and reported pain scores. We evaluate the clinical literature and discuss the efficacy of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute postoperative pain when administered alone or in conjunction with other agents via the oral, intramuscular, subcutaneous, intravenous and intraspinal routes. Low-dose ketamine is defined as a bolus dose of less than 2 mg/g when given intramuscularly or less than 1 mg/kg when administered via the intravenous or epidural route. For continuous i.v. administration low-dose ketamine is defined as a rate of < or =20 microg/kg per min. We conclude that ketamine may provide clinicians with a tool to improve postoperative pain management and to reduce opioid related adverse effects. The evidence suggests that low-dose ketamine may play an important role in postoperative pain management when used as an adjunct to local anesthetics, opioids, or other analgesic agents. Further research is required in the following areas: (a) dose-finding studies for ketamine as an adjunct to opioids and local anesthetics (b) efficacy and optimal route of administration (c) the role of S(+)-ketamine; (d) the influence of ketamine on long-term outcome such as chronic pain (e) long-term physical and chemical stability of mixtures containing ketamine (f) spinal toxicity of ketamine and (g) effects of low-dose ketamine on cognitive and memory functioning after surgery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/410894
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/395830
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/436027
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/304005
                Journal
                Front Vet Sci
                Front Vet Sci
                Front. Vet. Sci.
                Frontiers in Veterinary Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-1769
                12 May 2017
                2017
                : 4
                : 68
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Université de Montréal , Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada
                [2] 2Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX, USA
                [3] 3Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) , Botucatu, Brazil
                Author notes

                Edited by: Christopher R. Byron, Virginia Tech, USA

                Reviewed by: Yael Shilo-Benjamini, Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, Israel; Michael Jaffe, Midwestern University, USA

                *Correspondence: Bradley T. Simon, bsimondacvaa@ 123456gmail.com

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science

                Article
                10.3389/fvets.2017.00068
                5427076
                28553642
                e25031f7-cac2-44e0-867b-fac29b2cfa4d
                Copyright © 2017 Steagall, Simon, Teixeira Neto and Luna.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 29 November 2016
                : 20 April 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 141, Pages: 12, Words: 10712
                Funding
                Funded by: Texas A and M University 10.13039/100007904
                Categories
                Veterinary Science
                Review

                epidural,canine,analgesia,anesthesia,opioids,local anesthetics,pain
                epidural, canine, analgesia, anesthesia, opioids, local anesthetics, pain

                Comments

                Comment on this article