35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Persistence at 12 months with denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: interim results from a prospective observational study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Summary

          To determine persistence with subcutaneous denosumab every 6 months in women being treated for osteoporosis, we conducted a single-arm prospective, observational study in the United States and Canada. Among 935 patients enrolled, 12-month persistence was 82 %, with 66 patients (7 %) reporting serious adverse events and 19 patients (2 %) reporting fractures.

          Introduction

          Increased persistence with osteoporosis therapy is associated with reduced fracture risk. Denosumab reduced fracture risk in clinical trials; persistence in community settings is undetermined. This study evaluates persistence with denosumab in community practice in the United States (US) and Canada.

          Methods

          In a 24-month multicenter, prospective, single-arm, observational study, women being treated for osteoporosis were enrolled ≤4 weeks after the first subcutaneous injection of denosumab. For this 12-month prespecified interim analysis, endpoints include persistence (one injection at study entry and another within 6 months + 8 weeks), attributes associated with persistence (univariate analysis), and serious adverse events (SAEs).

          Results

          Among 935 patients (mean age 71 years), mean baseline T-scores were −2.18 (femoral neck) and −2.00 (lumbar spine); 50 % of patients had experienced osteoporotic fracture(s). At 12 months, 82 % of patients were persistent with denosumab. Baseline factors significantly ( p < 0.05) associated with higher persistence included use of osteoporosis medications >5 years previously, lumbar spine T-score > −2.5, and treatment by female physicians (US). Lower persistence was associated ( p < 0.05) with psychiatric diagnoses including depression, southern US residence, being divorced, separated, or widowed (US), and prior hip fracture (Canada). SAEs were reported in 66 patients (7 %); no SAEs of osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femoral fracture, fracture healing complications, hypocalcemia, eczema, or hypersensitivity were reported. Nineteen patients (2 %) reported osteoporotic fractures.

          Conclusions

          The 12-month persistence observed in this single-arm open-label study of US and Canadian community practice extends the evidence regarding denosumab’s potential role in reducing fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00198-014-2871-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.

          (2001)
          To clarify the factors associated with prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis, and to present the most recent information available in these areas. From March 27-29, 2000, a nonfederal, nonadvocate, 13-member panel was convened, representing the fields of internal medicine, family and community medicine, endocrinology, epidemiology, orthopedic surgery, gerontology, rheumatology, obstetrics and gynecology, preventive medicine, and cell biology. Thirty-two experts from these fields presented data to the panel and an audience of 699. Primary sponsors were the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases and the National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research. MEDLINE was searched for January 1995 through December 1999, and a bibliography of 2449 references provided to the panel. Experts prepared abstracts for presentations with relevant literature citations. Scientific evidence was given precedence over anecdotal experience. The panel, answering predefined questions, developed conclusions based on evidence presented in open forum and the literature. The panel composed a draft statement, which was read and circulated to the experts and the audience for public discussion. The panel resolved conflicts and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The draft statement was posted on the Web on March 30, 2000, and updated with the panel's final revisions within a few weeks. Though prevalent in white postmenopausal women, osteoporosis occurs in all populations and at all ages and has significant physical, psychosocial, and financial consequences. Risks for osteoporosis (reflected by low bone mineral density [BMD]) and for fracture overlap but are not identical. More attention should be paid to skeletal health in persons with conditions associated with secondary osteoporosis. Clinical risk factors have an important but poorly validated role in determining who should have BMD measurement, in assessing fracture risk, and in determining who should be treated. Adequate calcium and vitamin D intake is crucial to develop optimal peak bone mass and to preserve bone mass throughout life. Supplementation with these 2 nutrients may be necessary in persons not achieving recommended dietary intake. Gonadal steroids are important determinants of peak and lifetime bone mass in men, women, and children. Regular exercise, especially resistance and high-impact activities, contributes to development of high peak bone mass and may reduce risk of falls in older persons. Assessment of bone mass, identification of fracture risk, and determination of who should be treated are the optimal goals when evaluating patients for osteoporosis. Fracture prevention is the primary treatment goal for patients with osteoporosis. Several treatments have been shown to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures, including those that enhance bone mass and reduce the risk or consequences of falls. Adults with vertebral, rib, hip, or distal forearm fractures should be evaluated for osteoporosis and given appropriate therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases.

            To characterize the relationships between adherence (complance and persistence) to bisphosphonate therapy and risk of specific fracture types in postmenopausal women. Data were collected from 45 employers and 100 health plans in the continental United States from 2 claims databases during a 5-year period (January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2003). Claims from patients receiving a bisphosphonate prescription (alendronate or risedronate) were evaluated for 6 months before the Index prescription and during 24 months of follow-up to determine total, vertebral, and nonvertebral osteoporotic fractures, persistence (no gap in refills for >30 days during 24 months), and refill compliance (medication possession ratio > or = 0.80). The eligible cohort included 35,537 women (age, > or = 45 years) who received a bisphosphonate prescription. A subgroup with a specified diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis was also evaluated. Forty-three percent were refill compliant, and 20% persisted with bisphosphonate therapy during the 24-month study period. Total, vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures were significantly lower in refill-compliant and persistent patients, with relative risk reductions of 20% to 45%. The relationship between adherence and fracture risk remained significant after adjustment for baseline age, concomitant medications, and fracture history. There was a progressive relationship between refill compliance and fracture risk reduction, commencing at refill compliance rates of approximately 50% and becoming more pronounced at compliance rates of 75% and higher. Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy was associated with significantly fewer fractures at 24 months. Increasing refill compliance levels were associated with progressively lower fracture rates. These findings suggest that incremental changes in medication-taking habits could improve clinical outcomes of osteoporosis treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial.

              Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits bone resorption by neutralizing RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclast formation, function, and survival. This phase 3, multicenter, doubleblind study compared the efficacy and safety of denosumab with alendronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. One thousand one hundred eighty-nine postmenopausal women with a T-score
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                310-358-2234 , stuarts@omcresearch.org
                Journal
                Osteoporos Int
                Osteoporos Int
                Osteoporosis International
                Springer London (London )
                0937-941X
                1433-2965
                19 September 2014
                19 September 2014
                2015
                : 26
                : 361-372
                Affiliations
                [ ]Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and OMC Clinical Research Center, 8641 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 301, Los Angeles, CA 90211 USA
                [ ]Columbia University Medical Center, 180 Fort Washington Avenue, HP9-964, New York, NY 10032 USA
                [ ]University of British Columbia, Prohealth, 150-943 W Broadway, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E1 Canada
                [ ]AlchemiPharma LLC, 678 Knox Rd, Wayne, PA 19087 USA
                [ ]Laval University, CHU de Québec (CHUL) Research Center, Room S-763, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, QC G1V 4G2 Canada
                [ ]Duke University Medical Center, Box 3003, Durham, NC 27710 USA
                [ ]New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center and University of New Mexico School of Medicine, 300 Oak St. NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106 USA
                [ ]McMaster University, Juravinski Research Center, Room 151, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, ON L8M 1W9 Canada
                [ ]Health East Osteoporosis Care, 1875 Woodwinds Drive, Woodbury, MN 55125 USA
                [ ]Amgen Limited, 240 Milton Road, Cambridge, UK CB4 0WD
                [ ]Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
                [ ]United Osteoporosis Centers, 2350 Limestone Pkwy, Gainesville, GA 30501 USA
                Article
                2871
                10.1007/s00198-014-2871-6
                4286624
                25236877
                e26ef857-4215-4a92-83fb-fac50ec488c5
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

                History
                : 31 December 2013
                : 21 August 2014
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2015

                Orthopedics
                adherence,compliance,denosumab,observational study,osteoporosis,persistence
                Orthopedics
                adherence, compliance, denosumab, observational study, osteoporosis, persistence

                Comments

                Comment on this article