15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Promoting recovery from severe mental illness: Implications from research on metacognition and metacognitive reflection and insight therapy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Research indicates that individuals with schizophrenia recover. Recovery, however means different things to different individuals and regardless of what kind of experiences define recovery, the individual diagnosed with the serious mental illness must feel ownership of their recovery. This raises the issue of how mental health services should systematically promote recovery. This paper explores the practical implications for research on metacognition in schizophrenia for this issue. First, we present the integrated model of metacognition, which defines metacognition as the spectrum of activities which allow individual to have available to themselves an integrated sense of self and others as they appraise and respond to the unique challenges they face. Second, we present research suggesting that many with schizophrenia experience deficits in metacognition and that those deficits compromise individuals’ abilities to manage their lives and mental health challenges. Third, we discuss a form of psychotherapy inspired by this research, Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy which assists individuals to recapture the ability to form integrated ideas about themselves and others and so direct their own recovery. The need for recovery oriented interventions to focus on process and on patient’s purposes, assess metacognition and consider the intersubjective contexts in which this occurres is discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition.

          We propose that the crucial difference between human cognition and that of other species is the ability to participate with others in collaborative activities with shared goals and intentions: shared intentionality. Participation in such activities requires not only especially powerful forms of intention reading and cultural learning, but also a unique motivation to share psychological states with others and unique forms of cognitive representation for doing so. The result of participating in these activities is species-unique forms of cultural cognition and evolution, enabling everything from the creation and use of linguistic symbols to the construction of social norms and individual beliefs to the establishment of social institutions. In support of this proposal we argue and present evidence that great apes (and some children with autism) understand the basics of intentional action, but they still do not participate in activities involving joint intentions and attention (shared intentionality). Human children's skills of shared intentionality develop gradually during the first 14 months of life as two ontogenetic pathways intertwine: (1) the general ape line of understanding others as animate, goal-directed, and intentional agents; and (2) a species-unique motivation to share emotions, experience, and activities with other persons. The developmental outcome is children's ability to construct dialogic cognitive representations, which enable them to participate in earnest in the collectivity that is human cognition.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy of the third wave of behavioral therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

            During the last two decades a number of therapies, under the name of the third wave of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), have been developed: acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP), functional analytic psychotherapy (FAP), and integrative behavioral couple therapy (IBCT). The purposes of this review article of third wave treatment RCTs were: (1) to describe and review them methodologically, (2) to meta-analytically assess their efficacy, and (3) to evaluate if they currently fulfil the criteria for empirically supported treatments. There are 13 RCTs both in ACT and DBT, 1 in CBASP, 2 in IBCT, and none in FAP. The conclusions that can be drawn are that the third wave treatment RCTs used a research methodology that was significantly less stringent than CBT studies; that the mean effect size was moderate for both ACT and DBT, and that none of the third wave therapies fulfilled the criteria for empirically supported treatments. The article ends with suggestions on how to improve future RCTs to increase the possibility of them becoming empirically supported treatments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Relational Frame Theory, and the Third Wave of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies - Republished Article.

              The first wave of behavior therapy countered the excesses and scientific weakness of existing nonempirical clinical traditions through empirically studied first-order change efforts linked to behavioral principles targeting directly relevant clinical targets. The second wave was characterized by similar direct change efforts guided by social learning and cognitive principles that included cognitive in addition to behavioral and emotive targets. Various factors seem to have set the stage for a third wave, including anomalies in the current literature and philosophical changes. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is one of a number of new interventions from both behavioral and cognitive wings that seem to be moving the field in a different direction. ACT is explicitly contextualistic and is based on a basic experimental analysis of human language and cognition, Relational Frame Theory (RFT). RFT explains why cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance are both ubiquitous and harmful. ACT targets these processes and is producing supportive data both at the process and outcome level. The third-wave treatments are characterized by openness to older clinical traditions, a focus on second order and contextual change, an emphasis of function over form, and the construction of flexible and effective repertoires, among other features. They build on the first- and second-wave treatments, but seem to be carrying the behavior therapy tradition forward into new territory.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Psychiatry
                WJP
                World Journal of Psychiatry
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                2220-3206
                22 March 2018
                22 March 2018
                : 8
                : 1
                : 1-11
                Affiliations
                Department of Psychiatry, Roudebush VA Med Ctr and the Indiana Univeristy School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46254, United States
                Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46254, United States
                Department of Psychiatry, Eskenazi Health, Midtown Community Mental Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
                Eskenazi Health, Midtown Community Mental Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
                Department of Psychology, Hasson-Ohayon, I, Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Psychol, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel
                Department of Psychology, University of Indianapolis, College of Applied Behavioral Sciences, Indianapolis, IN 46227, United States
                Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46254, United States
                Eskenazi Health, Midtown Community Mental Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Lysaker PH performed the literature review; all authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and approved the final version.

                Correspondence to: Paul Henry Lysaker, PhD, Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Roudebush VA Med Ctr and the Indiana Univeristy School of Medicine, 1481 West 10 th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States. plysaker@ 123456iupui.edu

                Telephone: +1-317-931788-2546 Fax: +1-317-9885391

                Article
                jWJP.v8.i1.pg1
                10.5498/wjp.v8.i1.1
                5862649
                29568726
                e2725ba9-8e38-4db7-b734-0ae4fa1de232
                ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                : 30 October 2017
                : 4 December 2017
                : 7 January 2018
                Categories
                Therapeutics Advances

                schizophrenia,rehabilitation,self,psychosis,metacognition,recovery,psychotherapy,social cognition

                Comments

                Comment on this article