66
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Scientists' warning on invasive alien species

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 3 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 3 , 3 , 12 , 13 , 3 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 1 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 3
      Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
      Blackwell Publishing Ltd
      biological invasions, biosecurity, global change, environmental impacts, invasion dynamics, invasion hotspots, naturalization, policy, protected areas, socioeconomic impacts

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Biological invasions are a global consequence of an increasingly connected world and the rise in human population size. The numbers of invasive alien species – the subset of alien species that spread widely in areas where they are not native, affecting the environment or human livelihoods – are increasing. Synergies with other global changes are exacerbating current invasions and facilitating new ones, thereby escalating the extent and impacts of invaders. Invasions have complex and often immense long‐term direct and indirect impacts. In many cases, such impacts become apparent or problematic only when invaders are well established and have large ranges. Invasive alien species break down biogeographic realms, affect native species richness and abundance, increase the risk of native species extinction, affect the genetic composition of native populations, change native animal behaviour, alter phylogenetic diversity across communities, and modify trophic networks. Many invasive alien species also change ecosystem functioning and the delivery of ecosystem services by altering nutrient and contaminant cycling, hydrology, habitat structure, and disturbance regimes. These biodiversity and ecosystem impacts are accelerating and will increase further in the future. Scientific evidence has identified policy strategies to reduce future invasions, but these strategies are often insufficiently implemented. For some nations, notably Australia and New Zealand, biosecurity has become a national priority. There have been long‐term successes, such as eradication of rats and cats on increasingly large islands and biological control of weeds across continental areas. However, in many countries, invasions receive little attention. Improved international cooperation is crucial to reduce the impacts of invasive alien species on biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human livelihoods. Countries can strengthen their biosecurity regulations to implement and enforce more effective management strategies that should also address other global changes that interact with invasions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references288

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide

          Although research on human-mediated exchanges of species has substantially intensified during the last centuries, we know surprisingly little about temporal dynamics of alien species accumulations across regions and taxa. Using a novel database of 45,813 first records of 16,926 established alien species, we show that the annual rate of first records worldwide has increased during the last 200 years, with 37% of all first records reported most recently (1970–2014). Inter-continental and inter-taxonomic variation can be largely attributed to the diaspora of European settlers in the nineteenth century and to the acceleration in trade in the twentieth century. For all taxonomic groups, the increase in numbers of alien species does not show any sign of saturation and most taxa even show increases in the rate of first records over time. This highlights that past efforts to mitigate invasions have not been effective enough to keep up with increasing globalization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines.

            In 2002, world leaders committed, through the Convention on Biological Diversity, to achieve a significant reduction in the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. We compiled 31 indicators to report on progress toward this target. Most indicators of the state of biodiversity (covering species' population trends, extinction risk, habitat extent and condition, and community composition) showed declines, with no significant recent reductions in rate, whereas indicators of pressures on biodiversity (including resource consumption, invasive alien species, nitrogen pollution, overexploitation, and climate change impacts) showed increases. Despite some local successes and increasing responses (including extent and biodiversity coverage of protected areas, sustainable forest management, policy responses to invasive alien species, and biodiversity-related aid), the rate of biodiversity loss does not appear to be slowing.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health.

              The past two decades have seen an increasing number of virulent infectious diseases in natural populations and managed landscapes. In both animals and plants, an unprecedented number of fungal and fungal-like diseases have recently caused some of the most severe die-offs and extinctions ever witnessed in wild species, and are jeopardizing food security. Human activity is intensifying fungal disease dispersal by modifying natural environments and thus creating new opportunities for evolution. We argue that nascent fungal infections will cause increasing attrition of biodiversity, with wider implications for human and ecosystem health, unless steps are taken to tighten biosecurity worldwide.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                pysek@ibot.cas.cz
                Journal
                Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc
                Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc
                10.1111/(ISSN)1469-185X
                BRV
                Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                1464-7931
                1469-185X
                25 June 2020
                December 2020
                : 95
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/brv.v95.6 )
                : 1511-1534
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology Průhonice CZ‐252 43 Czech Republic
                [ 2 ] Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science Charles University Viničná 7 Prague CZ‐128 44 Czech Republic
                [ 3 ] Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology Stellenbosch University Matieland 7602 South Africa
                [ 4 ] Bio‐Protection Research Centre Lincoln University Canterbury New Zealand
                [ 5 ] Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville TN U.S.A.
                [ 6 ] Department of Biology University of Fribourg Fribourg Switzerland
                [ 7 ] Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution, and Environment University College London London WC1E 6BT U.K.
                [ 8 ] Institute of Zoology Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park London NW1 4RY U.K.
                [ 9 ] Maritime Studies Program Williams College – Mystic Seaport 75 Greenmanville Mystic CT 06355 U.S.A.
                [ 10 ] Department of Biosciences Durham University, South Road Durham DH1 3LE U.K.
                [ 11 ] Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation and Landscape Ecology, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 12 ] Conservation Services South African National Parks Private Bag X402 Skukuza 1350 South Africa
                [ 13 ] ISPRA Institute for Environmental Protection and Research and Chair IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group Rome Italy
                [ 14 ] Leibniz‐Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) Müggelseedamm 310 Berlin 12587 Germany
                [ 15 ] Institute of Biology Freie Universität Berlin Königin‐Luise‐Str. 1‐3 Berlin 14195 Germany
                [ 16 ] Berlin‐Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB) Königin‐Luise‐Str. 2‐4 Berlin 14195 Germany
                [ 17 ] Department Community Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Theodor‐Lieser‐Str. 4 Halle 06120 Germany
                [ 18 ] Geobotany & Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Am Kirchtor 1 Halle 06108 Germany
                [ 19 ] German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Deutscher Platz 5e Leipzig 04103 Germany
                [ 20 ] US Forest Service Northern Research Station 180 Canfield St. Morgantown West Virginia U.S.A.
                [ 21 ] Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague CZ‐165 00 Czech Republic
                [ 22 ] Department of Biological Sciences University of Toronto 1265 Military Trail Toronto Ontario M1C 1A4 Canada
                [ 23 ] Department of Natural Resources Science The University of Rhode Island Kingston Rhode Island 02881 U.S.A.
                [ 24 ] Facultad de Ciencias Forestales Universidad de Concepción Concepción Chile
                [ 25 ] Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity Santiago Chile
                [ 26 ] U.K. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Wallingford OX10 8BB U.K.
                [ 27 ] Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK‐F) Senckenberganlage 25 Frankfurt am Main 60325 Germany
                [ 28 ] Ecology, Department of Biology University of Konstanz Universitätsstrasse 10 Constance 78457 Germany
                [ 29 ] Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Taizhou University Taizhou 318000 China
                [ 30 ] Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD‐CSIC) Avd. Américo Vespucio 26 Isla de la Cartuja, Sevilla 41092 Spain
                [ 31 ] Department of Plant Biology and Ecology University of Sevilla Sevilla Spain
                [ 32 ] Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI) University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Address for correspondence (Tel: +420 271015266; E‐mail: pysek@ 123456ibot.cas.cz ).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8500-442X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5712-0474
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1424-9291
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5147-7165
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0152-2663
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3748-8893
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3402-0774
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8253-2112
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7071-6739
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0262-1420
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3328-4217
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-8249
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7427-6534
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8335-9681
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1283-3865
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1284-3163
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0045-1974
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6050-679X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8993-6419
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-3701
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3171-8261
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9346-2009
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-8297
                Article
                BRV12627
                10.1111/brv.12627
                7687187
                32588508
                e285a17f-66c4-4124-86df-76cb1193b913
                © 2020 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 08 October 2019
                : 30 May 2020
                : 03 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Pages: 24, Words: 30463
                Funding
                Funded by: USDA Forest Service , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100006959;
                Award ID: EVA4.0
                Funded by: Akademie Věd České Republiky
                Award ID: 67985939
                Funded by: Austrian Science Foundation FWF
                Award ID: I 3757‐B29
                Funded by: Belmont Forum
                Award ID: 01LC1803A, 01LC1807B, PCI2018‐092939
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100001659;
                Award ID: 264740629
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG
                Award ID: JE 288/9‐2
                Funded by: Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100008736;
                Award ID: AFB‐170008
                Funded by: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
                Award ID: 01LC1803A, 01LC1807B
                Funded by: Grantová Agentura České Republiky , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100001824;
                Award ID: 19‐28807X
                Funded by: Nancy Gore Hunger Professorship in Environmental Studies of the University of Tennessee
                Funded by: National Research Foundation of South Africa
                Award ID: IFR2010041400019 and IFR160215158271
                Funded by: Natural Environment Research Council , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000270;
                Award ID: NE/R016429/1
                Funded by: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
                Award ID: 31BD30_184114, and 31003A_179491
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.4 mode:remove_FC converted:25.11.2020

                Ecology
                biological invasions,biosecurity,global change,environmental impacts,invasion dynamics,invasion hotspots,naturalization,policy,protected areas,socioeconomic impacts

                Comments

                Comment on this article