80
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Transcriptome-wide discovery of circular RNAs in Archaea

      research-article
      , , , *
      Nucleic Acids Research
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Circular RNA forms had been described in all domains of life. Such RNAs were shown to have diverse biological functions, including roles in the life cycle of viral and viroid genomes, and in maturation of permuted tRNA genes. Despite their potentially important biological roles, discovery of circular RNAs has so far been mostly serendipitous. We have developed circRNA-seq, a combined experimental/computational approach that enriches for circular RNAs and allows profiling their prevalence in a whole-genome, unbiased manner. Application of this approach to the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 revealed multiple circular transcripts, a subset of which was further validated independently. The identified circular RNAs included expected forms, such as excised tRNA introns and rRNA processing intermediates, but were also enriched with non-coding RNAs, including C/D box RNAs and RNase P, as well as circular RNAs of unknown function. Many of the identified circles were conserved in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, further supporting their functional significance. Our results suggest that circular RNAs, and particularly circular non-coding RNAs, are more prevalent in archaea than previously recognized, and might have yet unidentified biological roles. Our study establishes a specific and sensitive approach for identification of circular RNAs using RNA-seq, and can readily be applied to other organisms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prokaryotic transcriptomics: a new view on regulation, physiology and pathogenicity.

          Transcriptome-wide studies in eukaryotes have been instrumental in the characterization of fundamental regulatory mechanisms for more than a decade. By contrast, in prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) whole-transcriptome studies have not been performed until recently owing to the general view that microbial gene structures are simple, as well as technical difficulties in enriching for mRNAs that lack poly(A) tails. Deep RNA sequencing and tiling array studies are now revolutionizing our understanding of the complexity, plasticity and regulation of microbial transcriptomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Flexible sequence similarity searching with the FASTA3 program package.

            B. Pearson (1999)
            The FASTA3 and FASTA2 packages provide a flexible set of sequence-comparison programs that are particularly valuable because of their accurate statistical estimates and high-quality alignments. Traditionally, sequence similarity searches have sought to ask one question: "Is my query sequence homologous to anything in the database?" Both FASTA and BLAST can provide reliable answers to this question with their statistical estimates; if the expectation value E is < 0.001-0.01 and you are not doing hundreds of searches a day, the answer is probably yes. In general, the most effective search strategies follow these rules: 1. Whenever possible, compare at the amino acid level, rather than the nucleotide level. Search first with protein sequences (blastp, fasta3, and ssearch3), then with translated DNA sequences (fastx, blastx), and only at the DNA level as a last resort (Table 5). 2. Search the smallest database that is likely to contain the sequence of interest (but it must contain many unrelated sequences for accurate statistical estimates). 3. Use sequence statistics, rather than percent identity or percent similarity, as your primary criterion for sequence homology. 4. Check that the statistics are likely to be accurate by looking for the highest-scoring unrelated sequence, using prss3 to confirm the expectation, and searching with shuffled copies of the query sequence [randseq, searches with shuffled sequences should have E approx 1.0]. 5. Consider searches with different gap penalties and other scoring matrices. Searches with long query sequences against full-length sequence libraries will not change dramatically when BLOSUM62 is used instead of BLOSUM50 (20), or a gap penalty of -14/-2 is used in place of -12/-2. However, shallower or more stringent scoring matrices are more effective at uncovering relationships in partial sequences (3,18), and they can be used to sharpen dramatically the scope of the similarity search. However, as illustrated in the last section, the E value is only the first step in characterizing a sequence relationship. Once one has confidence that the sequences are homologous, one should look at the sequence alignments and percent identities, particularly when searching with lower quality sequences. When sequence alignments are very short, the alignment should become more significant when a shallower scoring matrix is used, e.g., BLOSUM62 rather than BLOSUM50 (remember to change the gap penalties). Homology can be reliably inferred from statistically significant similarity. Whereas homology implies common three-dimensional structure, homology need not imply common function. Orthologous sequences usually have similar functions, but paralogous sequences often acquire very different functional roles. Motif databases, such as PROSITE (21), can provide evidence for the conservation of critical functional residues. However, motif identity in the absence of overall sequence similarity is not a reliable indicator of homology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reverse transcriptase template switching and false alternative transcripts.

              Reverse transcriptase (RT) can switch from one template to another in a homology-dependent manner. In the study of eukaryotic transcripts, this propensity of RT can produce an artificially deleted cDNA, which can be wrongly interpreted as an alternative transcript. Here, we have investigated the presence of such template-switching artifacts in cDNA databases, by scanning a collection of human splice sites (Information for the Coordinates of Exons, ICE database). We have confirmed several cases at the experimental level. Artifacts represent a significant portion of apparently spliced sequences using noncanonical splice signals but are rare in the context of the whole database. However, care should be taken in the annotation of alternative transcripts, especially when the RT used is poorly thermostable and when the putative intron is flanked by direct repeats, which are the substrate for template switching.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nucleic Acids Res
                Nucleic Acids Res
                nar
                nar
                Nucleic Acids Research
                Oxford University Press
                0305-1048
                1362-4962
                April 2012
                April 2012
                2 December 2011
                2 December 2011
                : 40
                : 7
                : 3131-3142
                Affiliations
                Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
                Author notes
                *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +972 8 9346342; Fax: +972 8 9344108; Email: rotem.sorek@ 123456weizmann.ac.il
                Article
                gkr1009
                10.1093/nar/gkr1009
                3326292
                22140119
                e28df626-8875-4be3-b7cd-208fe0fe59d0
                © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 April 2011
                : 5 October 2011
                : 21 October 2011
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                RNA

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article