15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      An effect comparison of teriparatide and bisphosphonate on posterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with osteoporosis: a prospective cohort study and preliminary data

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of teriparatide for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in osteoporotic women.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation.

          In an attempt to evaluate the effects of bone mineral density on the quality of fixation of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine, the axial pullout force was determined and compared in normal and osteoporotic human lumbar spines. Four techniques of screw hole preparation were evaluated. Two pedicle screw/offset laminar hook constructs also were evaluated to determine whether the adjunct fixation of the laminar hooks would improve quality of fixation to a level sufficient to allow their use in the osteoporotic lumbar spine. Pedicle screws were inserted by one of the listed techniques into fresh frozen cadaveric human spines. The fixation strength then was evaluated by pullout on a uniaxial testing frame. Bone mineral density was a strong influence on axial pullout force. In normal bone, the method of screw hole preparation did not significantly affect the quality of fixation. However, in the osteoporotic spine, either an untapped screw hole or the tapping of a screw hole with a 5.5 mm tap improved the pullout force a statistically significant amount (P < 0.003). Also, a pedicle screw with offset hooks at two adjacent levels improved the fixation significantly, increasing the pullout force to twice the expected value. Pedicle screw pullout strength was highly correlated with bone mineral density. A 5.5 mm tap or preparation with a ganglion knife improved pullout strength. Use of pedicle screws in conjunction with laminar hooks at two levels improved pullout strength.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Teriparatide accelerates lumbar posterolateral fusion in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: prospective study.

            Prospective trial.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Does alendronate disturb the healing process of posterior lumbar interbody fusion? A prospective randomized trial.

              Bisphosphonate medications are widely used for the treatment of osteoporosis, but they might disturb the healing process of spinal fusion. The object of this prospective randomized controlled study was to evaluate the effect of bisphosphonate medication on spinal fusion through radiographic, clinical, and biological assessments. A total of 40 patients with osteoporosis who were candidates for single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion were randomly assigned to the alendronate group (alendronate sodium 35 mg/week) or the control group (vitamin D, alfacalcidol 1 μg/day). Pedicle screw fixation and carbon polyetheretherketone cages were used for all the patients. Bone graft material was prepared as a mixture of local bone and β-tricalcium phosphate in a ratio of 2:1. Functional radiography and CT scans were used to evaluate fusion status and cage subsidence. The incidence of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) occurring after surgery (subsequent VCFs) was assessed by means of MR imaging. Bridging bone formation was graded into 3 categories: Grade A (bridging bone through bilateral cages), Grade B (bridging bone through a unilateral cage), or Grade C (incomplete bony bridging). A solid fusion was defined as less than 5° of angular motion in flexion-extension radiographs and the presence of bridging bone through the cage (Grade A or B). Clinical outcome was evaluated by means of the Oswestry Disability Index. Bone metabolic markers (serum bone alkaline phosphatase, serum and urine Type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptides) were measured to investigate the biological effects of alendronate on spinal fusion. Bridging bone formation (Grade A or B) was more frequently observed in the alendronate group at all postoperative assessment periods. At 1-year postoperative follow-up, a solid fusion was achieved in 95% of the patients in the alendronate group and 65% of those in the control group. Cage subsidence (> 2 mm) was observed in 5% of the alendronate group and 29% of the control group. No vertebral fractures were observed in the alendronate group, whereas 24% of patients in the control group showed subsequent VCFs. There was no statistically significant between-groups difference in clinical outcomes, but poor clinical results in the control group were associated with pseudarthrosis and subsequent VCFs. Biochemical analysis of bone turnover demonstrated that alendronate inhibited bone resorption from the early phase of the fusion process and also suppressed bone formation after 6 months postoperatively. Favorable mechanical circumstances provided by alendronate overcame its detrimental biological effect on the healing process of spinal fusion. The authors recommend that osteoporosis patients undergoing spinal fusion take bisphosphonates throughout the postoperative period.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                European Spine Journal
                Eur Spine J
                Springer Nature
                0940-6719
                1432-0932
                March 2017
                December 2015
                : 26
                : 3
                : 691-697
                Article
                10.1007/s00586-015-4342-y
                26661639
                e29b1186-a19e-40c8-ae97-9347f1a8feff
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content1,472

                Cited by20

                Most referenced authors319