0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Age-related and gender-related differences between human vertebral and iliac crest bone--a histomorphometric study on the population of the Mediterranean Coast of Croatia.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this study, osseous tissue was examined in normal adult population that has inhabited areas by the Croatian Adriatic Sea. The most of such studies have shown that women are prone to lose bone connectedness, while men are predisposed to be a stronger constitution and they start with greater bone mass, though. Bone samples from two different anatomic sites were analyzed. The crista iliaca and the lumbar vertebra represent functionally different organs too. We wanted to consider weather the same age- and gender-related changes affect these two organs due to normal aging. Static histomorphometry was used to quantify involution changes in the trabecular bone. Results showed that involution process more severely affects women than men. Age-related structural changes were more prominent in lumbar vertebra than in iliac crest bone. Severe structural changes in lumbar vertebra could subsequently lead to a dysfunctional and deformed vertebral column. Therefore, iliac crest bone biopsies could hardly explain involution process that affects lumbar spine.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Coll Antropol
          Collegium antropologicum
          0350-6134
          0350-6134
          Mar 2006
          : 30
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Split, Split, Croatia.
          Article
          16617575
          e2af69c3-ca20-4df5-bc66-fd597e47f0be
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article