27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial

      research-article
      , MD a , * , , MD d , , MD f , , Prof, MD h , , Prof, MD i , , MD j , , MD k , , Prof, MD l , m , , MD g , , MD n , , Prof, MD o , , MD p , , PhD q , , Prof, MD r , , Prof, MD s , , MD t , , MD u , , MD v , , Prof, MD w , , MD x , , Prof, MD y , z , , Prof, PhD b , , MD e , , MD aa , , MD ab , , MD a , , MSc l , m , , PhD ac , , Prof, PhD c , , Prof, MD a , PORTEC Study Group
      The Lancet. Oncology
      Lancet Pub. Group

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          The PORTEC-3 trial investigated the benefit of combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. We updated the analysis to investigate patterns of recurrence and did a post-hoc survival analysis.

          Methods

          In the multicentre randomised phase 3 PORTEC-3 trial, women with high-risk endometrial cancer were eligible if they had International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage I, endometrioid grade 3 cancer with deep myometrial invasion or lymphovascular space invasion, or both; stage II or III disease; or stage I–III disease with serous or clear cell histology; were aged 18 years and older; and had a WHO performance status of 0–2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive radiotherapy alone (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions given on 5 days per week) or chemoradiotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m 2 given intravenously during radiotherapy, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 given intravenously), by use of a biased coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage, and histological type. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival and failure-free survival. Secondary endpoints of vaginal, pelvic, and distant recurrence were analysed according to the first site of recurrence. Survival endpoints were analysed by intention-to-treat, and adjusted for stratification factors. Competing risk methods were used for failure-free survival and recurrence. We did a post-hoc analysis to analyse patterns of recurrence with 1 additional year of follow-up. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013; follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN14387080, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138.

          Findings

          Between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 686 women were enrolled, of whom 660 were eligible and evaluable (330 in the chemoradiotherapy group, and 330 in the radiotherapy-alone group). At a median follow-up of 72·6 months (IQR 59·9–85·6), 5-year overall survival was 81·4% (95% CI 77·2–85·8) with chemoradiotherapy versus 76·1% (71·6–80·9) with radiotherapy alone (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·51–0·97], p=0·034), and 5-year failure-free survival was 76·5% (95% CI 71·5–80·7) versus 69·1% (63·8–73·8; HR 0·70 [0·52–0·94], p=0·016). Distant metastases were the first site of recurrence in most patients with a relapse, occurring in 78 of 330 women (5-year probability 21·4%; 95% CI 17·3–26·3) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 98 of 330 (5-year probability 29·1%; 24·4–34·3) in the radiotherapy-alone group (HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·55–0·99]; p=0·047). Isolated vaginal recurrence was the first site of recurrence in one patient (0·3%; 95% CI 0·0–2·1) in both groups (HR 0·99 [95% CI 0·06–15·90]; p=0·99), and isolated pelvic recurrence was the first site of recurrence in three women (0·9% [95% CI 0·3–2·8]) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus four (0·9% [95% CI 0·3–2·8]) in the radiotherapy-alone group (HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·17–3·33]; p=0·71). At 5 years, only one grade 4 adverse event (ileus or obstruction) was reported (in the chemoradiotherapy group). At 5 years, reported grade 3 adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, occurring in 16 (8%) of 201 women in the chemoradiotherapy group versus ten (5%) of 187 in the radiotherapy-alone group (p=0·24). The most common grade 3 adverse event was hypertension (in four [2%] women in both groups). At 5 years, grade 2 or worse adverse events were reported in 76 (38%) of 201 women in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 43 (23%) of 187 in the radiotherapy-alone group (p=0·002). Sensory neuropathy persisted more often after chemoradiotherapy than after radiotherapy alone, with 5-year rates of grade 2 or worse neuropathy of 6% (13 of 201 women) versus 0% (0 of 187). No treatment-related deaths were reported.

          Interpretation

          This updated analysis shows significantly improved overall survival and failure-free survival with chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone. This treatment schedule should be discussed and recommended, especially for women with stage III or serous cancers, or both, as part of shared decision making between doctors and patients. Follow-up is ongoing to evaluate long-term survival.

          Funding

          Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council, Project Grant, Cancer Australia Grant, Italian Medicines Agency, and the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Integrated Genomic Characterization of Endometrial Carcinoma

          Summary We performed an integrated genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic characterization of 373 endometrial carcinomas using array- and sequencing-based technologies. Uterine serous tumors and ~25% of high-grade endometrioid tumors have extensive copy number alterations, few DNA methylation changes, low ER/PR levels, and frequent TP53 mutations. Most endometrioid tumors have few copy number alterations or TP53 mutations but frequent mutations in PTEN, CTNNB1, PIK3CA, ARID1A, KRAS and novel mutations in the SWI/SNF gene ARID5B. A subset of endometrioid tumors we identified had a dramatically increased transversion mutation frequency, and newly identified hotspot mutations in POLE. Our results classified endometrial cancers into four categories: POLE ultramutated, microsatellite instability hypermutated, copy number low, and copy number high. Uterine serous carcinomas share genomic features with ovarian serous and basal-like breast carcinomas. We demonstrated that the genomic features of endometrial carcinomas permit a reclassification that may impact post-surgical adjuvant treatment for women with aggressive tumors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models.

              Standard survival data measure the time span from some time origin until the occurrence of one type of event. If several types of events occur, a model describing progression to each of these competing risks is needed. Multi-state models generalize competing risks models by also describing transitions to intermediate events. Methods to analyze such models have been developed over the last two decades. Fortunately, most of the analyzes can be performed within the standard statistical packages, but may require some extra effort with respect to data preparation and programming. This tutorial aims to review statistical methods for the analysis of competing risks and multi-state models. Although some conceptual issues are covered, the emphasis is on practical issues like data preparation, estimation of the effect of covariates, and estimation of cumulative incidence functions and state and transition probabilities. Examples of analysis with standard software are shown. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet Oncol
                Lancet Oncol
                The Lancet. Oncology
                Lancet Pub. Group
                1470-2045
                1474-5488
                1 September 2019
                September 2019
                : 20
                : 9
                : 1273-1285
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
                [b ]Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
                [c ]Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
                [d ]Department of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
                [e ]Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
                [f ]Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                [g ]Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                [h ]Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology, Città della Salute and S Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
                [i ]Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
                [j ]Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
                [k ]Department of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
                [l ]Cancer Research UK, London, UK
                [m ]UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
                [n ]Division of Radiation Oncology, ASST-Lecco, Ospedale AManzoni, Lecco, Italy
                [o ]Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
                [p ]Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France
                [q ]Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
                [r ]Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
                [s ]Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
                [t ]Department of Pathology, Central Manchester Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
                [u ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
                [v ]Department of Oncology – Radiotherapy, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
                [w ]Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Hôpital Notre-Dame de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
                [x ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
                [y ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
                [z ]GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, Netherlands
                [aa ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
                [ab ]Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
                [ac ]Comprehensive Cancer Center Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Dr Stephanie de Boer, Department of Radiation Oncology, K1-P, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands s.m.de_boer.onco@ 123456lumc.nl
                [†]

                The participating groups, centres, and coordinators are listed in the appendix

                Article
                S1470-2045(19)30395-X
                10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30395-X
                6722042
                31345626
                e2bddb01-ae34-4697-9081-97f52c100236
                © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article