2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Between sisters: Watching replication-associated recombinational DNA repair

      article-commentary
      The Journal of Cell Biology
      Rockefeller University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lovett previews work from Amarh et al. describing the dynamics of RecA-mediated repair at replication-dependent breaks.

          Abstract

          Amarh et al. (2018. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201803020) visualize for the first time the repair of double-strand breaks during DNA replication. As viewed by live-cell fluorescent imaging of Escherichia coli, repair of replication-dependent breaks is extraordinarily rapid and localized within the cell.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Endogenous DNA double-strand breaks: production, fidelity of repair, and induction of cancer.

          This article extends our previous quantitative analysis of the relationship between the dynamics of the primary structure of DNA and mutagenesis associated with single-strand lesions to an analysis of the production and processing of endogenous double-strand breaks (EDSBs) and to their implications for oncogenesis. We estimate that in normal human cells approximately 1% of single-strand lesions are converted to approximately 50 EDSBs per cell per cell cycle. This number is similar to that for EDSBs produced by 1.5-2.0 Gy of sparsely ionizing radiation. Although EDSBs are usually repaired with high fidelity, errors in their repair contribute significantly to the rate of cancer in humans. The doubling dose for induced DSBs is similar to doubling doses for mutation and for the induction of carcinomas by ionizing radiation. We conclude that rates of production of EDSBs and of ensuing spontaneous mitotic recombination events can account for a substantial fraction of the earliest oncogenic events in human carcinomas.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Regulation of bacterial RecA protein function.

            The RecA protein is a recombinase functioning in recombinational DNA repair in bacteria. RecA is regulated at many levels. The expression of the recA gene is regulated within the SOS response. The activity of the RecA protein itself is autoregulated by its own C-terminus. RecA is also regulated by the action of other proteins. To date, these include the RecF, RecO, RecR, DinI, RecX, RdgC, PsiB, and UvrD proteins. The SSB protein also indirectly affects RecA function by competing for ssDNA binding sites. The RecO and RecR, and possibly the RecF proteins, all facilitate RecA loading onto SSB-coated ssDNA. The RecX protein blocks RecA filament extension, and may have other effects on RecA activity. The DinI protein stabilizes RecA filaments. The RdgC protein binds to dsDNA and blocks RecA access to dsDNA. The PsiB protein, encoded by F plasmids, is uncharacterized, but may inhibit RecA in some manner. The UvrD helicase removes RecA filaments from RecA. All of these proteins function in a network that determines where and how RecA functions. Additional regulatory proteins may remain to be discovered. The elaborate regulatory pattern is likely to be reprised for RecA homologues in archaeans and eukaryotes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              RecA bundles mediate homology pairing between distant sisters during DNA break repair

              DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination (HR) has evolved to maintain genetic integrity in all organisms 1 . Although many reactions that occur during HR are known 1-3 , it is unclear where, when and how they occur in cells is lacking. Here, by using conventional and super-resolution microscopy we describe the progression of DSB repair in live Escherichia coli. Specifically, we investigate whether HR can occur efficiently between distant sister loci that have segregated to opposite halves of an E. coli cell. We show that a site-specific DSB in one sister can be repaired efficiently using distant sister homology. After RecBCD processing of the DSB, RecA is recruited to the cut locus, where it nucleates into a bundle that contains many more RecA molecules than can associate with the two ssDNA regions that form at the DSB. Mature bundles extend along the cell long axis in the space between the bulk nucleoid and the inner membrane. Bundle formation is followed by pairing in which the two ends of the cut locus relocate at the periphery of the nucleoid and together move rapidly towards the homology of the uncut sister. After sister locus pairing, RecA bundles disassemble and proteins that act late in HR are recruited to give viable recombinants 1-2 generation time equivalents after formation of the initial DSB. Mutated RecA proteins that do not form bundles are defective in sister pairing and in DSB-induced repair. The work reveals an unanticipated role of RecA bundles in channeling the movement of the DNA DSB ends, thereby facilitating the long-range homology search that occurs before the strand invasion and transfer reactions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cell Biol
                J. Cell Biol
                jcb
                jcb
                The Journal of Cell Biology
                Rockefeller University Press
                0021-9525
                1540-8140
                02 July 2018
                : 217
                : 7
                : 2225-2227
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Biology and Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Susan T. Lovett: lovett@ 123456brandeis.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2792-1857
                Article
                201805091
                10.1083/jcb.201805091
                6028551
                29895696
                e2bdf1be-046a-4df2-9d29-a92d8dd143ce
                © 2018 Lovett

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute for General Medical Sciences, DOI 10.13039/100000057;
                Award ID: R01 GM057153
                Categories
                Commentaries
                Spotlight
                27
                21
                40

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article