+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Correlation of changes in hemodynamic response as measured by cerebral optical spectrometry with subjective pain ratings in volunteers and patients: a prospective cohort study

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.



          Noninvasive cerebral optical spectrometry is a promising candidate technology for the objective assessment physiological changes during pain perception. This study’s primary objective was to test if there was a significant correlation between the changes in physiological parameters as measured by a cerebral optical spectrometry-based algorithm (real-time objective pain assessment [ROPA]) and subjective pain ratings obtained from volunteers and laboring women. Secondary aims were performance assessment using linear regression and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis.

          Patients and methods

          Prospective cohort study performed in Human Pain Laboratory and Labor and Delivery Unit. After institutional review board approval, we evaluated ROPA in volunteers undergoing the cold pressor test and in laboring women before and after epidural or combined spinal epidural placement. Linear regression was performed to measure correlations. ROCs and corresponding areas under the ROCs (AUC), as well as Youden’s indices, as a measure of diagnostic effectiveness, were calculated.


          Correlations between numeric rating scale or visual analog scale and ROPA were significant for both volunteers and laboring women. AUCs for both volunteers and laboring women with numeric rating scale and visual analog scale subjective pain ratings as ground truth revealed at least good (AUC: 70%–79%) to excellent (AUC >90%) distinction between clinically meaningful pain severity differentiations (no/mild–moderate–severe).


          Cerebral Optical Spectrometry-based ROPA significantly correlated with subjectively reported pain in volunteers and laboring women, and could be a useful monitor for clinical circumstances where direct assessment is not available, or to complement patient-reported pain scores.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Index for rating diagnostic tests.

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Changes in skin conductance as a tool to monitor nociceptive stimulation and pain.

             Hanne Storm (2008)
            The skin conductance algesimeter (SCA) reflects the sympathetic nervous system influenced by changes in emotions, which releases the acetylcholine that acts on muscarine receptors, causing a subsequent burst of sweat and increased skin conductance. The SCA reacts immediately and is not influenced by hemodynamic variability or neuromuscular blockade. The use of SCA for pain and nociceptive assessment is outlined in this review. When pain was monitored by verbal reporting in postoperative patients, the SCA had a sensitivity of about 90% and specificity up to 74% to identify the pain, better than heart rate and blood pressure. In general anesthetized patients, both the sensitivity and specificity were about 90% to detect responses to noxious stimulation when compared with clinical stress variables. The SCA reflects changes in norepeinephrine levels induced by nociception better than heart rate, blood pressure, and electroencephalograph (EEG) monitors. Unlike EEG monitors, the SCA response is sensitive to experimental noxious stimuli during general anesthesia, and the measured response was attenuated by analgesic medication. This SCA response is significantly associated with genetically modulated pain sensitivity. Moreover, noxious stimuli in artificially ventilated patients and in preterm infants increase the SCA index, and the increase correlates to the clinical discomfort. The SCA detects nociceptive pain fast and continuously, specific to the individual, with higher sensitivity and specificity than other available objective methods.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pain as the fifth vital sign: exposing the vital need for pain education.

              The push to evaluate pain in patients as exemplified by the fifth vital sign has exposed serious deficits in practitioner education and training in pain assessment and management because patient report of pain level has become commonplace in clinical practice. The rapid increase in prescription opioid medications suggests that practitioners are trying to address their patients' pain by prescribing opioids. However, the increase in prescription opioids has also been associated with an increase in prescription opioid-related unintended deaths. In clinical practice, the fifth vital sign has proven to be more complex to assess, evaluate, and manage than originally anticipated. Expanding pain education and training is critical to remedying some of the issues the routine report of pain by patients has uncovered.

                Author and article information

                J Pain Res
                J Pain Res
                Journal of Pain Research
                Journal of Pain Research
                Dove Medical Press
                24 September 2018
                : 11
                : 1991-1998
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA, alexander.tzabazis@ 123456uksh.de
                [2 ]Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
                [3 ]ROPAmedics LLC, San Francisco, CA, USA
                [4 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany, alexander.tzabazis@ 123456uksh.de
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Alexander Z Tzabazis, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany, Tel +49 451 5004 0708, Fax +49 451 5004 0704, Email alexander.tzabazis@ 123456uksh.de
                © 2018 Eisenried et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited

                The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                Original Research


                Comment on this article