4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Consumo de café como factor protector contra cáncer oral y faríngeo: análisis crítico de la literatura Translated title: Coffee consumption as a protective factor against oral and pharyngeal cancer: critical analysis of the literature

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN La alta y desigual prevalencia de cáncer oral y faríngeo, junto al alto consumo de café a nivel mundial, hacen que se realicen estudios para analizar cómo contribuye el consumo de estas bebidas que contienen metilxantinas en el riesgo de estas neoplasias, aunque con resultados contradictorios. El objetivo del presente estudio fue comprobar la validez y la aplicabilidad de los resultados con respecto a la efectividad del alto consumo de café en adultos como factor protector del cáncer oral y faríngeo y responder al siguiente interrogante: ¿puede un alto consumo de café en bebida ser un factor protector contra el cáncer oral y faríngeo? Se analizó el artículo de Miranda et al. (2017): “El café es protector contra el cáncer oral y faríngeo: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis”. Se encontró una asociación protectora significativa entre el consumo de café y el riesgo de cáncer oral, y faríngeo especialmente (z=2,34; p=0,019; OR=0,72), infiriendo que el desarrollo del cáncer oral en individuos que consumen grandes cantidades de café es 1,45 veces menor que en individuos que consumen poca cantidad o no consumen (OR=0,69; 95%IC=0,57-0,84). No obstante, con las limitaciones metodológicas de los estudios primarios incluidos en la revisión sistemática con metaanálisis, no consideramos suficiente la evidencia actual moderada para recomendar el consumo de altas cantidades de la bebida de café para prevenir cáncer oral o faríngeo en personas adultas.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT The high and unequal prevalence of oral and pharyngeal cancer, together with the high consumption of coffee worldwide, make studies to analyze how the consumption of these drinks containing methylxanthines contributes in the risk of these neoplasms, although with contradictory results. The objective of the present study was to verify the validity and applicability of the results regarding the effectiveness of high coffee consumption in adults as a protective factor for oral and pharyngeal cancer and answer the following question: ¿can a high consumption of coffee in drink be a protective factor against oral and pharyngeal cancer? The article by Miranda et al. (2017) was analyzed: “Coffee is protective against oral and pharyngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. A significant protective association was found between coffee consumption and the risk of oral cancer, and especially pharyngeal (z=2.34; p=0.019; OR=0.72), inferring that the development of oral cancer in individuals who consume large amounts of coffee is 1.45 times lower than in individuals who consume small quantities or do not consume (OR=0.69; 95%CI=0.57-0.84). However, with the methodological limitations of the primary studies included in the systematic review with meta-analysis, we do not consider the current moderate evidence sufficient to recommend the consumption of high quantities of the beverage of coffee to prevent oral or pharyngeal cancer in adults.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer statistics, 2015.

          Each year the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data were collected by the National Cancer Institute (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER] Program), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (National Program of Cancer Registries), and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. A total of 1,658,370 new cancer cases and 589,430 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States in 2015. During the most recent 5 years for which there are data (2007-2011), delay-adjusted cancer incidence rates (13 oldest SEER registries) declined by 1.8% per year in men and were stable in women, while cancer death rates nationwide decreased by 1.8% per year in men and by 1.4% per year in women. The overall cancer death rate decreased from 215.1 (per 100,000 population) in 1991 to 168.7 in 2011, a total relative decline of 22%. However, the magnitude of the decline varied by state, and was generally lowest in the South (∼15%) and highest in the Northeast (≥20%). For example, there were declines of 25% to 30% in Maryland, New Jersey, Massachusetts, New York, and Delaware, which collectively averted 29,000 cancer deaths in 2011 as a result of this progress. Further gains can be accelerated by applying existing cancer control knowledge across all segments of the population. © 2015 American Cancer Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency.

            This article deals with inconsistency of relative (rather than absolute) treatment effects in binary/dichotomous outcomes. A body of evidence is not rated up in quality if studies yield consistent results, but may be rated down in quality if inconsistent. Criteria for evaluating consistency include similarity of point estimates, extent of overlap of confidence intervals, and statistical criteria including tests of heterogeneity and I(2). To explore heterogeneity, systematic review authors should generate and test a small number of a priori hypotheses related to patients, interventions, outcomes, and methodology. When inconsistency is large and unexplained, rating down quality for inconsistency is appropriate, particularly if some studies suggest substantial benefit, and others no effect or harm (rather than only large vs. small effects). Apparent subgroup effects may be spurious. Credibility is increased if subgroup effects are based on a small number of a priori hypotheses with a specified direction; subgroup comparisons come from within rather than between studies; tests of interaction generate low P-values; and have a biological rationale. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Carcinogenicity of drinking coffee, mate, and very hot beverages.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                renhyd
                Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética
                Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet
                Academia Española de Nutrición y Dietética (Pamplona, Navarra, Spain )
                2173-1292
                2174-5145
                September 2019
                : 23
                : 3
                : 194-200
                Affiliations
                [2] Concepción Bío-Bío orgnameUniversidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción orgdiv1Facultad de Medicina, Kinesiología orgdiv2Departamento de Salud Pública Chile
                [1] Manizales Caldas orgnameUniversidad Autónoma de Manizales Colombia
                Article
                S2174-51452019000300008 S2174-5145(19)02300300008
                10.14306/renhyd.23.3.650
                e2e65782-562f-40f4-907c-0091eacd9f72

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 21 June 2019
                : 07 September 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 27, Pages: 7
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Análisis Metodológico

                Caffeine,Mouth Neoplasms,Cafeína,Pharyngeal Neoplasms,Coffee,Café,Risk,Riesgo,Neoplasias Faríngeas,Neoplasias de la Boca

                Comments

                Comment on this article