98
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    8
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects

      Preprint
      , ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Causal mediation analysis is routinely conducted by applied researchers in a variety of disciplines. The goal of such an analysis is to investigate alternative causal mechanisms by examining the roles of intermediate variables that lie in the causal paths between the treatment and outcome variables. In this paper we first prove that under a particular version of sequential ignorability assumption, the average causal mediation effect (ACME) is nonparametrically identified. We compare our identification assumption with those proposed in the literature. Some practical implications of our identification result are also discussed. In particular, the popular estimator based on the linear structural equation model (LSEM) can be interpreted as an ACME estimator once additional parametric assumptions are made. We show that these assumptions can easily be relaxed within and outside of the LSEM framework and propose simple nonparametric estimation strategies. Second, and perhaps most importantly, we propose a new sensitivity analysis that can be easily implemented by applied researchers within the LSEM framework. Like the existing identifying assumptions, the proposed sequential ignorability assumption may be too strong in many applied settings. Thus, sensitivity analysis is essential in order to examine the robustness of empirical findings to the possible existence of an unmeasured confounder. Finally, we apply the proposed methods to a randomized experiment from political psychology. We also make easy-to-use software available to implement the proposed methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Process Analysis: Estimating Mediation in Treatment Evaluations

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Yes, but what's the mechanism? (don't expect an easy answer).

            Psychologists increasingly recommend experimental analysis of mediation. This is a step in the right direction because mediation analyses based on nonexperimental data are likely to be biased and because experiments, in principle, provide a sound basis for causal inference. But even experiments cannot overcome certain threats to inference that arise chiefly or exclusively in the context of mediation analysis-threats that have received little attention in psychology. The authors describe 3 of these threats and suggest ways to improve the exposition and design of mediation tests. Their conclusion is that inference about mediators is far more difficult than previous research suggests and is best tackled by an experimental research program that is specifically designed to address the challenges of mediation analysis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance

              Framing is the process by which a communication source, such as a news organization, defines and constructs a political issue or public controversy. Two experiments examined the effect of news frames on tolerance for the Ku Klux Klan. The first presented research participants with one of two local news stories about a Klan rally that varied by frame: One framed the rally as a free speech issue, and the other framed it as a disruption of public order. Participants who viewed the free speech story expressed more tolerance for the Klan than participants who watched the public order story. Additional data indicate that frames affect tolerance by altering the perceived importance of public order values. The relative accessibility of free speech and public order concepts did not respond to framing. A second experiment used a simulated electronic news service to present different frames and replicated these findings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                2010-11-04
                Article
                10.1214/10-STS321
                1011.1079
                e3021857-b605-4ea0-9b55-601b8e3d3f5a

                http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

                History
                Custom metadata
                IMS-STS-STS321
                Statistical Science 2010, Vol. 25, No. 1, 51-71
                Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/10-STS321 the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)
                stat.ME
                vtex

                Methodology
                Methodology

                Comments

                Comment on this article