3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Poststudy Point-of-Care Oral Fluid Testing in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Vaccinees

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Experimental human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 vaccines frequently elicit antibodies against HIV-1 that may react with commonly used HIV diagnostic tests, a phenomenon known as vaccine-induced seropositivity/seroreactivity (VISP/VISR). We sought to determine, under clinic conditions, whether a patient-controlled HIV test, OraQuick ADVANCE Rapid HIV-1/2 Antibody Test, detected HIV-1 vaccine-induced antibodies.

          Methods

          Plasma assessment of HIV-1 cross-reactivity was examined in end-of-study samples from 57 healthy, HIV-uninfected participants who received a candidate vaccine that has entered Phase 2B and 3 testing. We also screened 120 healthy, HIV-uninfected, unblinded HIV-1 vaccine participants with VISP/VISR for an assessment using saliva. These participants came from 21 different parent vaccine protocols representing 17 different vaccine regimens, all of which contained an HIV-1 envelope immunogen. OraQuick ADVANCE was compared with results from concurrent blood samples using a series of commercial HIV screening immunoassays.

          Results

          Fifty-seven unique participant plasma samples were assayed in vitro, and only 1 (1.8%) was reactive by OraQuick ADVANCE. None of the 120 clinic participants (0%; 95% confidence interval, 0% to 3.7%) tested positive by OraQuick ADVANCE, and all were confirmed to be uninfected by HIV-1 viral ribonucleic acid testing. One hundred eighteen of the 120 (98.3%) participants had a reactive HIV test for VISP/VISR: 77 (64%) had at least 1 reactive fourth-generation HIV-1 diagnostic test ( P < .0001 vs no reactive OraQuick ADVANCE results), and 41 (34%) only had a reactive test by the less specific third-generation Abbott Prism assay.

          Conclusions

          These data suggest that this widely available patient-controlled test has limited reactivity to HIV-1 antibodies elicited by these candidate HIV-1 vaccines.

          Abstract

          Experimental HIV-1 vaccines frequently elicit antibodies which cross-react with common HIV diagnostic tests. Vaccine-induced seropositivity/seroreactivity (VISP/VISR) can be problematic for clinical trial volunteers. We tested a point-of-care HIV test, OraQuick ADVANCE, to determine if it could detect VISP/VISR.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluation of a mosaic HIV-1 vaccine in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2a clinical trial (APPROACH) and in rhesus monkeys (NHP 13-19)

            BACKGROUND Over 1.8 million new cases of HIV-1 infection were diagnosed worldwide in 2016. No licensed prophylactic HIV-1 vaccine exists. METHODS This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase I/IIa clinical trial evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26) vector-based HIV-1 vaccine regimens in 393 participants in Eastern Africa, South Africa, Thailand and the United States. Participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups based on a computer-generated randomization code. Vaccine regimens included priming with Ad26 vectors expressing mosaic Env/Gag/Pol antigens and boosting with Ad26 or MVA vectors expressing these antigens with or without aluminum adjuvanted clade C Env gp140 protein. A parallel study in 72 rhesus monkeys assessed the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of these vaccine regimens against repetitive, heterologous, intrarectal challenges with simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV-SF162P3). RESULTS All vaccine regimens demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability. The mosaic Ad26 prime/Ad26+gp140 boost vaccine was the most immunogenic in humans; it elicited Env-specific binding antibody responses, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis responses, and T-cell responses in 100%, 80% and 83% of vaccine recipients, respectively. This vaccine regimen induced similar magnitude, durability, and phenotype of immune responses in rhesus monkeys and afforded 66% protection against acquisition of infection following a series of six SHIV-SF162P3 challenges. Env-specific ELISA and ELISPOT responses were the principal immune correlates of protection against SHIV challenge in monkeys. CONCLUSIONS The mosaic Ad26/Ad26+gp140 HIV-1 vaccine induced comparable and robust immune responses in humans and rhesus monkeys, and it provided significant protection against heterologous SHIV challenges in monkeys. This vaccine regimen is currently being evaluated in a phase IIb clinical efficacy study in sub-Saharan Africa.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy trial of a DNA/rAd5 HIV-1 preventive vaccine.

              A safe and effective vaccine for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is a global priority. We tested the efficacy of a DNA prime-recombinant adenovirus type 5 boost (DNA/rAd5) vaccine regimen in persons at increased risk for HIV-1 infection in the United States. At 21 sites, we randomly assigned 2504 men or transgender women who have sex with men to receive the DNA/rAd5 vaccine (1253 participants) or placebo (1251 participants). We assessed HIV-1 acquisition from week 28 through month 24 (termed week 28+ infection), viral-load set point (mean plasma HIV-1 RNA level 10 to 20 weeks after diagnosis), and safety. The 6-plasmid DNA vaccine (expressing clade B Gag, Pol, and Nef and Env proteins from clades A, B, and C) was administered at weeks 0, 4, and 8. The rAd5 vector boost (expressing clade B Gag-Pol fusion protein and Env glycoproteins from clades A, B, and C) was administered at week 24. In April 2013, the data and safety monitoring board recommended halting vaccinations for lack of efficacy. The primary analysis showed that week 28+ infection had been diagnosed in 27 participants in the vaccine group and 21 in the placebo group (vaccine efficacy, -25.0%; 95% confidence interval, -121.2 to 29.3; P=0.44), with mean viral-load set points of 4.46 and 4.47 HIV-1 RNA log10 copies per milliliter, respectively. Analysis of all infections during the study period (41 in the vaccine group and 31 in the placebo group) also showed lack of vaccine efficacy (P=0.28). The vaccine regimen had an acceptable side-effect profile. The DNA/rAd5 vaccine regimen did not reduce either the rate of HIV-1 acquisition or the viral-load set point in the population studied. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00865566.).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Open Forum Infect Dis
                Open Forum Infect Dis
                ofid
                Open Forum Infectious Diseases
                Oxford University Press (US )
                2328-8957
                January 2021
                15 December 2020
                15 December 2020
                : 8
                : 1
                : ofaa606
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [2 ] Morehouse School of Medicine , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [3 ] Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [4 ] Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [5 ] Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [6 ] Department of Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [7 ] Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and Development , Titusville, New Jersey, USA
                [8 ] Janssen Vaccines & Prevention, B.V. , Leiden, The Netherlands
                [9 ] National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , Rockville, Maryland, USA
                [10 ] Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Stephen R. Walsh, MDCM, Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115 ( swalsh@ 123456bwh.harvard.edu ).
                Present Affiliation: Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
                Present Affiliation: Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

                K. O. and E. J. F.-M. contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0817-9370
                Article
                ofaa606
                10.1093/ofid/ofaa606
                7813203
                33511233
                e326beee-5af7-4406-8316-64ed3ee9cf9d
                © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 17 June 2020
                : 07 December 2020
                : 10 December 2020
                : 18 January 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, DOI 10.13039/100000060;
                Funded by: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, DOI 10.13039/100006108;
                Funded by: U.S. Public Health Service, DOI 10.13039/100007197;
                Award ID: UM1 AI068614
                Award ID: UM1 AI068618
                Award ID: UM1 AI069412
                Award ID: UL1 RR025758
                Award ID: P30 AI027757
                Award ID: UM1 AI106701
                Categories
                Major Articles
                AcademicSubjects/MED00290

                hiv diagnostics,hiv vaccine,immunogenicity,vaccine safety

                Comments

                Comment on this article