30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
5 collections
    0
    shares

      For submission information please click on this link: https://www.hogrefe.com/eu/service/for-journal-authors

      More than a publisher.
      1949-1924

      Subscribe to our anniversary newsletter to learn more about the Hogrefe Group throughout the year – and be automatically entered for a chance to win prizes every month: SUBSCRIBE NOW

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Abortion Attitudes Across Cultural Contexts : Exploring the Role of Gender Inequality, Abortion Policy, and Individual Values

      1 , 2 , 1
      International Perspectives in Psychology
      Hogrefe Publishing Group

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract: We explored between-country and within-country variability in abortion attitudes, using country-level factors (e.g., gender equality) and individual-level factors (e.g., gender role attitudes) as predictors. Participants from Mexico ( N = 215), India ( N = 215), the United States ( N = 215), and the United Kingdom ( N = 206) were recruited via Qualtrics Panels. Regression models and ANOVAs were used to assess whether estimates of gender inequality, gender role attitudes, motherhood norms, belief in big/moralizing gods, and sexual strategy were associated with abortion attitudes. As predicted, individuals living in countries with greater gender inequality, and more restrictive abortion policy, reported more restrictive abortion attitudes and stronger support for banning abortion. Furthermore, individuals who endorsed more traditional gender role ideologies, who reported belief in big/moralizing gods and who used long-term sexual strategies also reported more restrictive abortion attitudes and stronger support for banning abortion. Exploratory analyses highlight how these relationships vary as a function of cultural context. We can conclude that both contextual factors (e.g., local abortion legislation and gender inequality) as well as individual factors (e.g., gender role attitudes and religious/spiritual belief) shape people’s attitudes toward abortion. Implications regarding the bidirectional relationship between attitudes and policy in reproductive health are discussed.

          Abstract

          Impact and Implications:

          Abortion attitudes matter—disapproving and judgmental attitudes toward abortion may create barriers to accessing needed abortion care as well as ostracism and stigma toward those receiving abortion care. Our findings, across the United States, the United Kingdom, India, and Mexico, demonstrate that achievement of gender equality (United Nations’ SDG #5) and promoting well-being and healthy lives for all at all ages (SDG #3) will depend on addressing both individual beliefs (i.e., beliefs about supernatural punishment, attitudes about people’s roles in society as a function of their gender, and attitudes about casual sex) and institutional structures (i.e., gender inequality and abortion legislation) that stand against safe and accessible abortion care for all.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Conceptualising abortion stigma.

          Abortion stigma is widely acknowledged in many countries, but poorly theorised. Although media accounts often evoke abortion stigma as a universal social fact, we suggest that the social production of abortion stigma is profoundly local. Abortion stigma is neither natural nor 'essential' and relies upon power disparities and inequalities for its formation. In this paper, we identify social and political processes that favour the emergence, perpetuation and normalisation of abortion stigma. We hypothesise that abortion transgresses three cherished 'feminine' ideals: perpetual fecundity; the inevitability of motherhood; and instinctive nurturing. We offer examples of how abortion stigma is generated through popular and medical discourses, government and political structures, institutions, communities and via personal interactions. Finally, we propose a research agenda to reveal, measure and map the diverse manifestations of abortion stigma and its impact on women's health.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research

            We examine key aspects of data quality for online behavioral research between selected platforms (Amazon Mechanical Turk, CloudResearch, and Prolific) and panels (Qualtrics and Dynata). To identify the key aspects of data quality, we first engaged with the behavioral research community to discover which aspects are most critical to researchers and found that these include attention, comprehension, honesty, and reliability. We then explored differences in these data quality aspects in two studies ( N  ~ 4000), with or without data quality filters (approval ratings). We found considerable differences between the sites, especially in comprehension, attention, and dishonesty. In Study 1 (without filters), we found that only Prolific provided high data quality on all measures. In Study 2 (with filters), we found high data quality among CloudResearch and Prolific. MTurk showed alarmingly low data quality even with data quality filters. We also found that while reputation (approval rating) did not predict data quality, frequency and purpose of usage did, especially on MTurk: the lowest data quality came from MTurk participants who report using the site as their main source of income but spend few hours on it per week. We provide a framework for future investigation into the ever-changing nature of data quality in online research, and how the evolving set of platforms and panels performs on these key aspects.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The cultural evolution of prosocial religions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                International Perspectives in Psychology
                International Perspectives in Psychology
                Hogrefe Publishing Group
                2157-3883
                2157-3891
                July 2024
                July 2024
                : 13
                : 3
                : 138-152
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Psychology, Brunel University London, UK
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX, USA
                Article
                10.1027/2157-3891/a000101
                e34b1108-1b9a-4728-a044-9701e751601c
                © 2024

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article