10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Modeling congenital disease and inborn errors of development in Drosophila melanogaster

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Fly models that faithfully recapitulate various aspects of human disease and human health-related biology are being used for research into disease diagnosis and prevention. Established and new genetic strategies in Drosophila have yielded numerous substantial successes in modeling congenital disorders or inborn errors of human development, as well as neurodegenerative disease and cancer. Moreover, although our ability to generate sequence datasets continues to outpace our ability to analyze these datasets, the development of high-throughput analysis platforms in Drosophila has provided access through the bottleneck in the identification of disease gene candidates. In this Review, we describe both the traditional and newer methods that are facilitating the incorporation of Drosophila into the human disease discovery process, with a focus on the models that have enhanced our understanding of human developmental disorders and congenital disease. Enviable features of the Drosophila experimental system, which make it particularly useful in facilitating the much anticipated move from genotype to phenotype (understanding and predicting phenotypes directly from the primary DNA sequence), include its genetic tractability, the low cost for high-throughput discovery, and a genome and underlying biology that are highly evolutionarily conserved. In embracing the fly in the human disease-gene discovery process, we can expect to speed up and reduce the cost of this process, allowing experimental scales that are not feasible and/or would be too costly in higher eukaryotes.

          Abstract

          Drosophila Collection: This Review highlights several Drosophila models of human inborn errors of development, with particular emphasis on the strategies geneticists have developed to break through the current genotype-to-phenotype bottleneck.

          Related collections

          Most cited references192

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage phiC31.

          The phiC31 integrase functions efficiently in vitro and in Escherichia coli, yeast, and mammalian cells, mediating unidirectional site-specific recombination between its attB and attP recognition sites. Here we show that this site-specific integration system also functions efficiently in Drosophila melanogaster in cultured cells and in embryos. Intramolecular recombination in S2 cells on transfected plasmid DNA carrying the attB and attP recognition sites occurred at a frequency of 47%. In addition, several endogenous pseudo attP sites were identified in the fly genome that were recognized by the integrase and used as substrates for integration in S2 cells. Two lines of Drosophila were created by integrating an attP site into the genome with a P element. phiC31 integrase injected into embryos as mRNA functioned to promote integration of an attB-containing plasmid into the attP site, resulting in up to 55% of fertile adults producing transgenic offspring. A total of 100% of these progeny carried a precise integration event at the genomic attP site. These experiments demonstrate the potential for precise genetic engineering of the Drosophila genome with the phiC31 integrase system and will likely benefit research in Drosophila and other insects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes.

            A comparative analysis of the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae-and the proteins they are predicted to encode-was undertaken in the context of cellular, developmental, and evolutionary processes. The nonredundant protein sets of flies and worms are similar in size and are only twice that of yeast, but different gene families are expanded in each genome, and the multidomain proteins and signaling pathways of the fly and worm are far more complex than those of yeast. The fly has orthologs to 177 of the 289 human disease genes examined and provides the foundation for rapid analysis of some of the basic processes involved in human disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A recurrent mutation in the BMP type I receptor ACVR1 causes inherited and sporadic fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva.

              Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder of skeletal malformations and progressive extraskeletal ossification. We mapped FOP to chromosome 2q23-24 by linkage analysis and identified an identical heterozygous mutation (617G --> A; R206H) in the glycine-serine (GS) activation domain of ACVR1, a BMP type I receptor, in all affected individuals examined. Protein modeling predicts destabilization of the GS domain, consistent with constitutive activation of ACVR1 as the underlying cause of the ectopic chondrogenesis, osteogenesis and joint fusions seen in FOP.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Dis Model Mech
                Dis Model Mech
                DMM
                dmm
                Disease Models & Mechanisms
                The Company of Biologists Ltd
                1754-8403
                1754-8411
                1 March 2016
                1 March 2016
                : 9
                : 3 , SUBJECT COLLECTION: SPOTLIGHT ON DROSOPHILA: TRANSLATIONAL IMPACT
                : 253-269
                Affiliations
                Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah , 15 North 2030 East, Room 5100, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5330, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Author for correspondence ( aletsou@ 123456genetics.utah.edu )
                Article
                DMM023564
                10.1242/dmm.023564
                4826979
                26935104
                e35f1a1f-9681-4ba5-a19e-94f66b5f6b35
                © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Directorate for Biological Sciences, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000076;
                Award ID: 1558010
                Categories
                Review

                Molecular medicine
                drosophila,congenital disorders,inborn errors of development,fly models,forward genetics,reverse genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article