12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Birth and Death of Olfactory Receptor Gene Families in Mammalian Niche Adaptation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The olfactory receptor (OR) gene families, which govern mammalian olfaction, have undergone extensive expansion and contraction through duplication and pseudogenization. Previous studies have shown that broadly defined environmental adaptations (e.g., terrestrial vs. aquatic) are correlated with the number of functional and non-functional OR genes retained. However, to date, no study has examined species-specific gene duplications in multiple phylogenetically divergent mammals to elucidate OR evolution and adaptation. Here, we identify the OR gene families driving adaptation to different ecological niches by mapping the fate of species-specific gene duplications in the OR repertoire of 94 diverse mammalian taxa, using molecular phylogenomic methods. We analyze >70,000 OR gene sequences mined from whole genomes, generated from novel amplicon sequencing data, and collated with data from previous studies, comprising one of the largest OR studies to date. For the first time, we demonstrate statistically significant patterns of OR species-specific gene duplications associated with the presence of a functioning vomeronasal organ. With respect to dietary niche, we uncover a novel link between a large number of duplications in OR family 5/8/9 and herbivory. Our results also highlight differences between social and solitary niches, indicating that a greater OR repertoire expansion may be associated with a solitary lifestyle. This study demonstrates the utility of species-specific duplications in elucidating gene family evolution, revealing how the OR repertoire has undergone expansion and contraction with respect to a number of ecological adaptations in mammals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families.

          Until around 1990, most multigene families were thought to be subject to concerted evolution, in which all member genes of a family evolve as a unit in concert. However, phylogenetic analysis of MHC and other immune system genes showed a quite different evolutionary pattern, and a new model called birth-and-death evolution was proposed. In this model, new genes are created by gene duplication and some duplicate genes stay in the genome for a long time, whereas others are inactivated or deleted from the genome. Later investigations have shown that most non-rRNA genes including highly conserved histone or ubiquitin genes are subject to this type of evolution. However, the controversy over the two models is still continuing because the distinction between the two models becomes difficult when sequence differences are small. Unlike concerted evolution, the model of birth-and-death evolution can give some insights into the origins of new genetic systems or new phenotypic characters.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time

            Theory predicts low niche differentiation between species over evolutionary time scales, but little empirical evidence is available. Reciprocal geographic predictions based on ecological niche models of sister taxon pairs of birds, mammals, and butterflies in southern Mexico indicate niche conservatism over several million years of independent evolution (between putative sister taxon pairs) but little conservatism at the level of families. Niche conservatism over such time scales indicates that speciation takes place in geographic, not ecological, dimensions and that ecological differences evolve later.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genome 10K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10,000 vertebrate species.

              (2009)
              The human genome project has been recently complemented by whole-genome assessment sequence of 32 mammals and 24 nonmammalian vertebrate species suitable for comparative genomic analyses. Here we anticipate a precipitous drop in costs and increase in sequencing efficiency, with concomitant development of improved annotation technology and, therefore, propose to create a collection of tissue and DNA specimens for 10,000 vertebrate species specifically designated for whole-genome sequencing in the very near future. For this purpose, we, the Genome 10K Community of Scientists (G10KCOS), will assemble and allocate a biospecimen collection of some 16,203 representative vertebrate species spanning evolutionary diversity across living mammals, birds, nonavian reptiles, amphibians, and fishes (ca. 60,000 living species). In this proposal, we present precise counts for these 16,203 individual species with specimens presently tagged and stipulated for DNA sequencing by the G10KCOS. DNA sequencing has ushered in a new era of investigation in the biological sciences, allowing us to embark for the first time on a truly comprehensive study of vertebrate evolution, the results of which will touch nearly every aspect of vertebrate biological enquiry.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Associate editor
                Journal
                Mol Biol Evol
                Mol. Biol. Evol
                molbev
                Molecular Biology and Evolution
                Oxford University Press
                0737-4038
                1537-1719
                June 2018
                19 March 2018
                19 March 2018
                : 35
                : 6
                : 1390-1406
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
                [2 ]AECOM, 9th Floor Clarence West Building, Clarence Street West, Belfast, BT2 7GP, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
                [4 ]UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: E-mail: emma.teeling@ 123456ucd.ie .

                Sequence data generated in this study can be accessed using Genbank accession numbers KU833289–KU836505.

                Article
                msy028
                10.1093/molbev/msy028
                5967467
                29562344
                e381c1a6-de27-4694-bc93-e11f9e635434
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 17
                Funding
                Award ID: Graduate Research Education Programme (GREP)
                Funded by: Science Foundation Ireland 10.13039/501100001602
                Award ID: PIYRA 06/YI3/B932
                Award ID: EF0629849
                Categories
                Discoveries

                Molecular biology
                olfactory receptors,mammalian evolution,ecological niche,adaptation,comparative genomics

                Comments

                Comment on this article