6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      COVID-19: Yet another coronavirus challenge in transplantation

      editorial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), causing a severe acute respiratory syndrome with its disease designated as COVID-19, emerged from its epicenter in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and is now a global pandemic. As of March 11, 2020, COVID-19 has been confirmed in 114 countries and involves 118,381 cases globally with 4,292 deaths. 1 Most reported infections are in China, followed by Italy, Iran, Republic of Korea, and the European Union. 1 Italy went into lockdown as a country on March 9, 2020, whereas in other countries such as the United States of America, several states have declared emergencies, focal biocontainment territories have been placed on lockdown, and cases are being reported to increase at an alarming rate. 2 The rapid increase is owed to the fact that more widespread testing is now slowly becoming available; however, this virus uniquely is more efficient in its rate of transmissibility, with an individual capable of spreading to 1 to 3 others. 3 The presentation of illness mimics that of a flu-like illness with fever and respiratory symptoms as common presenting complaints, and bilateral patchy infiltration is typically noted on computed tomography (CT) scans. 4 Most COVID-19 cases (87%) occur between 30 and 79 years of age, and most (81%) are mild. The remaining 14% present with severe symptoms, whereas 5% require care in an intensive care unit. 5 The case-fatality rate has been touted to be 2.3% overall (although this is likely overestimated because of the lack of widespread testing); however, death rates climb in those aged ≥80 years (15%) and in nearly half of those requiring critical care. 5 Those with cancer receiving chemotherapy as well as patients with multiple comorbidities are distinctively at a higher risk for severe illness. 5 , 6 However, information on the predilection, presentation, and prognosis of COVID-19 in solid organ transplantation is sparse and has not been adequately reported. Li et al. 7 report on the presentation and outcome of 2 microbiologically confirmed COVID-19 cases in heart transplantation detected in the Hubei Province in China. These 2 patients apparently were part of a community of at least 200 heart transplant survivors in that region and presented with variable severity of disease (one mild and another with more severe manifestations requiring a prolonged hospitalization); however, both survived the event. It is important to note that the clinical presentations were not distinct from those described in non-immunosuppressed individuals, and the patient with severe disease presented with a viral prodrome, displayed the typical findings on CT scan imaging, and progressed to clinical hypoxia. The second patient presented with a fever and mild CT scan findings (this being the screening modality used in China), with resolution in a few days. The laboratory findings mirrored those observed in non-transplant patients with elevated C-reactive protein levels and lymphopenia. The treatment for the patient with severe disease included withholding baseline immunosuppression and treating with high-dose corticosteroids and pooled immunoglobulin infusions. A kitchen sink approach to the cases also included the use of a fluoroquinolone along with ganciclovir, but whether this therapy was useful cannot be determined by this limited reporting. Crucially, the patient recovered to discharge without incurring immunologic consequences on the cardiac allograft and remained rejection-free. Whether transplantation-related immunosuppression alters the predisposition to acquiring infection with SARS-CoV-2 or if the disease implications are modified for better or for worse remain uncertain. The novel coronavirus achieves its anchoring to the lung by using the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2) receptor. The pulmonary renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system via ACE-2 has been implicated in prevention of lung inflammation. 8 When this system is overpowered by SARS-CoV-2, pulmonary inflammatory infiltrates emerge expressing the COVID-19 disease phenotype. It is unknown if heart transplant recipients have differential expression of pulmonary ACE-2 because a lower expression may result in less severe illness. Similarly, the anti-inflammatory effects of immunosuppression could diminish the clinical expression of the disease as well. These speculative assumptions will require structured studies to enhance our understanding of this disease pathway and processes. It is likely that immunosuppressed patients may be prone to acquiring the virus at higher risk because of its high efficiency in transmission. The virus shedding has been noted not only in respiratory specimens but also in serum and stool. Viral shedding can occur for days or weeks furtively in asymptomatic carrier individuals, especially children, 3 , 9 , 10 and fecal shedding has been noted in patients without diarrhea. 10 Significant environmental contamination has been noted, including wash basin, toilet bowl, and air outlet fan surfaces, in hospitalized patients. 11 Thus, it is prudent to advise transplant recipients to ardently practice mitigation strategies such as social distancing, sanitization, hand hygiene, and avoidance of areas known to harbor potentially infected individuals. These recommendations extend to their care providers as well. Therapy for manifest disease is gravely lacking at this time, although promise is on the horizon. Although several molecules are under investigation, remdesivir (an adenosine analog that incorporates into viral RNA chains and results in premature termination) and chloroquine (an anti-malarial drug that prevents viral cell fusion and interferes with glycosylation of cellular receptors of SARS-CoV) appear to have early in vitro evidence in support of their potential activity against SARS-CoV-2. 12 , 13 Other drugs, such as ribavirin, interferon, lopinavir-ritonavir, and corticosteroids that have been used in patients with the 2003 SARS or the 2012 Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome, are candidates for investigation. The reason is that the novel coronavirus belongs to the Betacoronavirus family, which also contains SARS-CoV and Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome–CoV. 12 Hyperimmune globulin that contains targeted antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, derived from the plasma of recovered individuals and thus capable of providing passive immunity, may also be therapeutic. 14 Ultimately, control of this outbreak will require the development of a vaccine. An important area of significant concern to transplant clinicians will involve the testing of donors, decisions on organ suitability from those recently exposed or infected, and the implications of recovery of such organs by procurement teams. This will need to be debated and studied rapidly as more widespread testing becomes available. At this time, it would be prudent to avoid transplanting organs from donors with a history of contact with someone at risk or diagnosed with COVID-19, as well as those with recent travel to an area with high density of infection. In summary, the novel coronavirus and its disease, COVID-19, require thoughtful approaches for the prevention, mitigation, timely detection, and appropriate therapeutic intervention for our vulnerable patients. Disclosure statement Dr Aslam reports consulting fees from Merck, unrelated to this manuscript; Dr Mehra reports no direct conflicts pertinent to the development of this editorial. Other general conflicts include consulting relationships with Abbott, Medtronic, Janssen, Mesoblast, Portola, Bayer, NupulseCV, FineHeart, Leviticus, and Triple Gene. Dr Mehra is also Editor in Chief of the Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. This paper should be considered to be the personal opinion of the authors and not the official stance of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro

          Dear Editor, In December 2019, a novel pneumonia caused by a previously unknown pathogen emerged in Wuhan, a city of 11 million people in central China. The initial cases were linked to exposures in a seafood market in Wuhan. 1 As of January 27, 2020, the Chinese authorities reported 2835 confirmed cases in mainland China, including 81 deaths. Additionally, 19 confirmed cases were identified in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, and 39 imported cases were identified in Thailand, Japan, South Korea, United States, Vietnam, Singapore, Nepal, France, Australia and Canada. The pathogen was soon identified as a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), which is closely related to sever acute respiratory syndrome CoV (SARS-CoV). 2 Currently, there is no specific treatment against the new virus. Therefore, identifying effective antiviral agents to combat the disease is urgently needed. An efficient approach to drug discovery is to test whether the existing antiviral drugs are effective in treating related viral infections. The 2019-nCoV belongs to Betacoronavirus which also contains SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome CoV (MERS-CoV). Several drugs, such as ribavirin, interferon, lopinavir-ritonavir, corticosteroids, have been used in patients with SARS or MERS, although the efficacy of some drugs remains controversial. 3 In this study, we evaluated the antiviral efficiency of five FAD-approved drugs including ribavirin, penciclovir, nitazoxanide, nafamostat, chloroquine and two well-known broad-spectrum antiviral drugs remdesivir (GS-5734) and favipiravir (T-705) against a clinical isolate of 2019-nCoV in vitro. Standard assays were carried out to measure the effects of these compounds on the cytotoxicity, virus yield and infection rates of 2019-nCoVs. Firstly, the cytotoxicity of the candidate compounds in Vero E6 cells (ATCC-1586) was determined by the CCK8 assay. Then, Vero E6 cells were infected with nCoV-2019BetaCoV/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 2 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.05 in the presence of varying concentrations of the test drugs. DMSO was used in the controls. Efficacies were evaluated by quantification of viral copy numbers in the cell supernatant via quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and confirmed with visualization of virus nucleoprotein (NP) expression through immunofluorescence microscopy at 48 h post infection (p.i.) (cytopathic effect was not obvious at this time point of infection). Among the seven tested drugs, high concentrations of three nucleoside analogs including ribavirin (half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) = 109.50 μM, half-cytotoxic concentration (CC50) > 400 μM, selectivity index (SI) > 3.65), penciclovir (EC50 = 95.96 μM, CC50 > 400 μM, SI > 4.17) and favipiravir (EC50 = 61.88 μM, CC50 > 400 μM, SI > 6.46) were required to reduce the viral infection (Fig. 1a and Supplementary information, Fig. S1). However, favipiravir has been shown to be 100% effective in protecting mice against Ebola virus challenge, although its EC50 value in Vero E6 cells was as high as 67 μM, 4 suggesting further in vivo studies are recommended to evaluate this antiviral nucleoside. Nafamostat, a potent inhibitor of MERS-CoV, which prevents membrane fusion, was inhibitive against the 2019-nCoV infection (EC50 = 22.50 μM, CC50 > 100 μM, SI > 4.44). Nitazoxanide, a commercial antiprotozoal agent with an antiviral potential against a broad range of viruses including human and animal coronaviruses, inhibited the 2019-nCoV at a low-micromolar concentration (EC50 = 2.12 μM; CC50 > 35.53 μM; SI > 16.76). Further in vivo evaluation of this drug against 2019-nCoV infection is recommended. Notably, two compounds remdesivir (EC50 = 0.77 μM; CC50 > 100 μM; SI > 129.87) and chloroquine (EC50 = 1.13 μM; CC50 > 100 μM, SI > 88.50) potently blocked virus infection at low-micromolar concentration and showed high SI (Fig. 1a, b). Fig. 1 The antiviral activities of the test drugs against 2019-nCoV in vitro. a Vero E6 cells were infected with 2019-nCoV at an MOI of 0.05 in the treatment of different doses of the indicated antivirals for 48 h. The viral yield in the cell supernatant was then quantified by qRT-PCR. Cytotoxicity of these drugs to Vero E6 cells was measured by CCK-8 assays. The left and right Y-axis of the graphs represent mean % inhibition of virus yield and cytotoxicity of the drugs, respectively. The experiments were done in triplicates. b Immunofluorescence microscopy of virus infection upon treatment of remdesivir and chloroquine. Virus infection and drug treatment were performed as mentioned above. At 48 h p.i., the infected cells were fixed, and then probed with rabbit sera against the NP of a bat SARS-related CoV 2 as the primary antibody and Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:500; Abcam) as the secondary antibody, respectively. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst dye. Bars, 100 μm. c and d Time-of-addition experiment of remdesivir and chloroquine. For “Full-time” treatment, Vero E6 cells were pre-treated with the drugs for 1 h, and virus was then added to allow attachment for 2 h. Afterwards, the virus–drug mixture was removed, and the cells were cultured with drug-containing medium until the end of the experiment. For “Entry” treatment, the drugs were added to the cells for 1 h before viral attachment, and at 2 h p.i., the virus–drug mixture was replaced with fresh culture medium and maintained till the end of the experiment. For “Post-entry” experiment, drugs were added at 2 h p.i., and maintained until the end of the experiment. For all the experimental groups, cells were infected with 2019-nCoV at an MOI of 0.05, and virus yield in the infected cell supernatants was quantified by qRT-PCR c and NP expression in infected cells was analyzed by Western blot d at 14 h p.i. Remdesivir has been recently recognized as a promising antiviral drug against a wide array of RNA viruses (including SARS/MERS-CoV 5 ) infection in cultured cells, mice and nonhuman primate (NHP) models. It is currently under clinical development for the treatment of Ebola virus infection. 6 Remdesivir is an adenosine analogue, which incorporates into nascent viral RNA chains and results in pre-mature termination. 7 Our time-of-addition assay showed remdesivir functioned at a stage post virus entry (Fig. 1c, d), which is in agreement with its putative anti-viral mechanism as a nucleotide analogue. Warren et al. showed that in NHP model, intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg dose of remdesivir resulted in concomitant persistent levels of its active form in the blood (10 μM) and conferred 100% protection against Ebola virus infection. 7 Our data showed that EC90 value of remdesivir against 2019-nCoV in Vero E6 cells was 1.76 μM, suggesting its working concentration is likely to be achieved in NHP. Our preliminary data (Supplementary information, Fig. S2) showed that remdesivir also inhibited virus infection efficiently in a human cell line (human liver cancer Huh-7 cells), which is sensitive to 2019-nCoV. 2 Chloroquine, a widely-used anti-malarial and autoimmune disease drug, has recently been reported as a potential broad-spectrum antiviral drug. 8,9 Chloroquine is known to block virus infection by increasing endosomal pH required for virus/cell fusion, as well as interfering with the glycosylation of cellular receptors of SARS-CoV. 10 Our time-of-addition assay demonstrated that chloroquine functioned at both entry, and at post-entry stages of the 2019-nCoV infection in Vero E6 cells (Fig. 1c, d). Besides its antiviral activity, chloroquine has an immune-modulating activity, which may synergistically enhance its antiviral effect in vivo. Chloroquine is widely distributed in the whole body, including lung, after oral administration. The EC90 value of chloroquine against the 2019-nCoV in Vero E6 cells was 6.90 μM, which can be clinically achievable as demonstrated in the plasma of rheumatoid arthritis patients who received 500 mg administration. 11 Chloroquine is a cheap and a safe drug that has been used for more than 70 years and, therefore, it is potentially clinically applicable against the 2019-nCoV. Our findings reveal that remdesivir and chloroquine are highly effective in the control of 2019-nCoV infection in vitro. Since these compounds have been used in human patients with a safety track record and shown to be effective against various ailments, we suggest that they should be assessed in human patients suffering from the novel coronavirus disease. Supplementary information Supplementary information, Materials and Figures
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China

            China and the rest of the world are experiencing an outbreak of a novel betacoronavirus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). 1 By Feb 12, 2020, the rapid spread of the virus had caused 42 747 cases and 1017 deaths in China and cases have been reported in 25 countries, including the USA, Japan, and Spain. WHO has declared 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, a public health emergency of international concern. In contrast to severe acute respiratory system coronavirus and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, more deaths from COVID-19 have been caused by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome rather than respiratory failure, 2 which might be attributable to the widespread distribution of angiotensin converting enzyme 2—the functional receptor for SARS-CoV-2—in multiple organs.3, 4 Patients with cancer are more susceptible to infection than individuals without cancer because of their systemic immunosuppressive state caused by the malignancy and anticancer treatments, such as chemotherapy or surgery.5, 6, 7, 8 Therefore, these patients might be at increased risk of COVID-19 and have a poorer prognosis. On behalf of the National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, we worked together with the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China to establish a prospective cohort to monitor COVID-19 cases throughout China. As of the data cutoff on Jan 31, 2020, we have collected and analysed 2007 cases from 575 hospitals (appendix pp 4–9 for a full list) in 31 provincial administrative regions. All cases were diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 acute respiratory disease and were admitted to hospital. We excluded 417 cases because of insufficient records of previous disease history. 18 (1%; 95% CI 0·61–1·65) of 1590 COVID-19 cases had a history of cancer, which seems to be higher than the incidence of cancer in the overall Chinese population (285·83 [0·29%] per 100 000 people, according to 2015 cancer epidemiology statistics 9 ). Detailed information about the 18 patients with cancer with COVID-19 is summarised in the appendix (p 1). Lung cancer was the most frequent type (five [28%] of 18 patients). Four (25%) of 16 patients (two of the 18 patients had unknown treatment status) with cancer with COVID-19 had received chemotherapy or surgery within the past month, and the other 12 (25%) patients were cancer survivors in routine follow-up after primary resection. Compared with patients without cancer, patients with cancer were older (mean age 63·1 years [SD 12·1] vs 48·7 years [16·2]), more likely to have a history of smoking (four [22%] of 18 patients vs 107 [7%] of 1572 patients), had more polypnea (eight [47%] of 17 patients vs 323 [23%] of 1377 patients; some data were missing on polypnea), and more severe baseline CT manifestation (17 [94%] of 18 patients vs 1113 [71%] of 1572 patients), but had no significant differences in sex, other baseline symptoms, other comorbidities, or baseline severity of x-ray (appendix p 2). Most importantly, patients with cancer were observed to have a higher risk of severe events (a composite endpoint defined as the percentage of patients being admitted to the intensive care unit requiring invasive ventilation, or death) compared with patients without cancer (seven [39%] of 18 patients vs 124 [8%] of 1572 patients; Fisher's exact p=0·0003). We observed similar results when the severe events were defined both by the above objective events and physician evaluation (nine [50%] of 18 patients vs 245 [16%] of 1572 patients; Fisher's exact p=0·0008). Moreover, patients who underwent chemotherapy or surgery in the past month had a numerically higher risk (three [75%] of four patients) of clinically severe events than did those not receiving chemotherapy or surgery (six [43%] of 14 patients; figure ). These odds were further confirmed by logistic regression (odds ratio [OR] 5·34, 95% CI 1·80–16·18; p=0·0026) after adjusting for other risk factors, including age, smoking history, and other comorbidities. Cancer history represented the highest risk for severe events (appendix p 3). Among patients with cancer, older age was the only risk factor for severe events (OR 1·43, 95% CI 0·97–2·12; p=0·072). Patients with lung cancer did not have a higher probability of severe events compared with patients with other cancer types (one [20%] of five patients with lung cancer vs eight [62%] of 13 patients with other types of cancer; p=0·294). Additionally, we used a Cox regression model to evaluate the time-dependent hazards of developing severe events, and found that patients with cancer deteriorated more rapidly than those without cancer (median time to severe events 13 days [IQR 6–15] vs 43 days [20–not reached]; p<0·0001; hazard ratio 3·56, 95% CI 1·65–7·69, after adjusting for age; figure). Figure Severe events in patients without cancer, cancer survivors, and patients with cancer (A) and risks of developing severe events for patients with cancer and patients without cancer (B) ICU=intensive care unit. In this study, we analysed the risk for severe COVID-19 in patients with cancer for the first time, to our knowledge; only by nationwide analysis can we follow up patients with rare but important comorbidities, such as cancer. We found that patients with cancer might have a higher risk of COVID-19 than individuals without cancer. Additionally, we showed that patients with cancer had poorer outcomes from COVID-19, providing a timely reminder to physicians that more intensive attention should be paid to patients with cancer, in case of rapid deterioration. Therefore, we propose three major strategies for patients with cancer in this COVID-19 crisis, and in future attacks of severe infectious diseases. First, an intentional postponing of adjuvant chemotherapy or elective surgery for stable cancer should be considered in endemic areas. Second, stronger personal protection provisions should be made for patients with cancer or cancer survivors. Third, more intensive surveillance or treatment should be considered when patients with cancer are infected with SARS-CoV-2, especially in older patients or those with other comorbidities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Discovering drugs to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

              The SARS-CoV-2 virus emerged in December 2019 and then spread rapidly worldwide, particularly to China, Japan, and South Korea. Scientists are endeavoring to find antivirals specific to the virus. Several drugs such as chloroquine, arbidol, remdesivir, and favipiravir are currently undergoing clinical studies to test their efficacy and safety in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China; some promising results have been achieved thus far. This article summarizes agents with potential efficacy against SARS-CoV-2.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Heart Lung Transplant
                J. Heart Lung Transplant
                The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
                International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.
                1053-2498
                1557-3117
                14 March 2020
                14 March 2020
                Affiliations
                [a ]Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
                [b ]Center for Advanced Heart Disease, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                Author notes
                [* ]Reprint requests: Mandeep R. Mehra, MD, MSc, Center for Advanced Heart Disease, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. Telephone: +1-617-732-8534. Fax: +1-617-264-5265. mmehra@ 123456bwh.harvard.edu
                Article
                S1053-2498(20)31468-6
                10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.007
                7141445
                32253113
                e39e18c2-60f0-45bf-8236-5843d2a3e03f
                © 2020 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Transplantation
                Transplantation

                Comments

                Comment on this article