17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Resultados de la asistencia compartida con medicina interna en un servicio de cirugía oral y maxilofacial Translated title: Results of comanagement with internal medicine in oral and maxillofacial surgery department

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN Antecedentes y objetivo: La edad de los pacientes ingresados para tratamiento por los servicios de cirugía oral y maxilofacial (COMF) es progresivamente más alta, con la comorbilidad asociada que eso conlleva, y supone un incremento sustancial de las interconsultas a los servicios de medicina interna (MI), que no alcanzan la efectividad requerida. Una alternativa para mejorar la atención a los pacientes es la colaboración entre ambos servicios mediante la asistencia compartida (AC). El objetivo de este artículo es estudiar la repercusión y el efecto del empleo de la AC en los pacientes de COMF. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de los pacientes ≥ 16 años ingresados desde el 12 de marzo de 2017 hasta el 12 de marzo de 2019 en COMF, con AC con MI desde el 12 de marzo de 2018. Las variables analizadas son edad, sexo, tipo de ingreso, si fue intervenido quirúrgicamente, peso administrativo asociado a GRD, número total de diagnósticos al alta, índice de comorbilidad de Charlson (ICh), exitus, reingresos urgentes y estancia hospitalaria. Resultados: Los pacientes con AC fueron de menor edad (2,8 años, intervalo de confianza del 95 % [IC 95 %] 0,1 a 5,6), pero con mayor número de diagnósticos (0,8; IC 95 % 0,4 a 1,2) y una tendencia a mayor ICh (0,3; IC 95 % -0,1 a 0,6) y peso administrativo (0,04; IC 95 % -0,03 a 0,1). Al ajustar, observamos que la AC redujo el 22,7 % la estancia en CMF, 1 día (IC 95 % -1,8 a -0,3), el 40 % los reingresos urgentes y el 50 % la mortalidad, ambos no significativos. El descenso de la estancia supone una disminución de costes de, como mínimo, 231.816,7 €. Conclusiones: La edad de los enfermos ingresados para tratamiento por los servicios de cirugía oral y maxilofacial es cada vez más alta, que se asocia con una mayor comorbilidad. El empleo de la asistencia compartida con medicina interna en el manejo de los pacientes ingresados en cirugía oral y maxilofacial se asocia a una disminución de la estancia y los costes, en línea con lo observado en otros servicios quirúrgicos.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT Background and objective: The age of patients admitted for treatment by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) services is progressively higher, with the associated comorbidity that this entails, and supposes a substantial increase in referrals to the Internal Medicine (IM) services, which do not reach the required effectiveness. An alternative to improve patient care is collaboration between both services through shared care (SC). The objective of this article is to study the repercussion and effect of the use of shared care in Oral and Maxillofacial patients. Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients aged ≥ 16 years admitted from 3/12/2017 to 3/12/2019 at OMFS, with SC with IM from 3/12/2018. The variables analyzed are age, sex, type of admission, whether the patient underwent surgery, administrative weight associated with DRG, total number of diagnoses at discharge, Charlson's comorbidity index (HCI), death, urgent readmissions and hospital stay. Results: Patients with AC were younger (2.8 years, 95 % confidence interval [95 % CI] 0.1 to 5.6), but with a greater number of diagnoses (0.8, 95 % CI 0.4 to 1.2) and a trend towards higher CIh (0.3; 95 % CI -0.1 to 0.6) and administrative weight (0.04; 95 % CI -0.03 to 0.1 ). When adjusting, we observed that CA reduced the stay in the CMF by 22.7 %, 1 day (CI 95 % -1.8 to -0.3), 40 % the urgent readmissions and 50 % the mortality, both not significant. The decrease in the stay implies a reduction in costs of, at least, € 231,816.7. Conclusions: The age of patients admitted for treatment by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery services is increasingly higher, which is associated with greater comorbidity. The use of shared care with Internal Medicine in the management of patients admitted to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is associated with a decrease in stay and costs, in line with what was observed in other surgical services.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.

          With advances in the effectiveness of treatment and disease management, the contribution of chronic comorbid diseases (comorbidities) found within the Charlson comorbidity index to mortality is likely to have changed since development of the index in 1984. The authors reevaluated the Charlson index and reassigned weights to each condition by identifying and following patients to observe mortality within 1 year after hospital discharge. They applied the updated index and weights to hospital discharge data from 6 countries and tested for their ability to predict in-hospital mortality. Compared with the original Charlson weights, weights generated from the Calgary, Alberta, Canada, data (2004) were 0 for 5 comorbidities, decreased for 3 comorbidities, increased for 4 comorbidities, and did not change for 5 comorbidities. The C statistics for discriminating in-hospital mortality between the new score generated from the 12 comorbidities and the Charlson score were 0.825 (new) and 0.808 (old), respectively, in Australian data (2008), 0.828 and 0.825 in Canadian data (2008), 0.878 and 0.882 in French data (2004), 0.727 and 0.723 in Japanese data (2008), 0.831 and 0.836 in New Zealand data (2008), and 0.869 and 0.876 in Swiss data (2008). The updated index of 12 comorbidities showed good-to-excellent discrimination in predicting in-hospital mortality in data from 6 countries and may be more appropriate for use with more recent administrative data. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Rehospitalizations among Patients in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Program

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comorbidity and survival of elderly head and neck carcinoma patients.

              Alcohol and tobacco, the primary etiologic agents for head and neck carcinoma (HNCA), cause other chronic diseases and may contribute to the high prevalence of comorbid conditions and generally poor survival of persons with HNCA. The authors explored the prognostic role of comorbidity in persons with HNCA using Health Care Finance Administration Medicare (HCFA) files linked with the appropriate files of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. The Charlson comorbidity index was applied to in-patient data from the HCFA files. The SEER data were used to ascertain survival and identify persons with HNCA diagnosed from 1985 to 1993 (n = 9386). In a proportional hazards regression model adjusted for age and historic stage at diagnosis, race, gender, marital status, socioeconomic status, histologic grade, anatomic site, treatment, and pre-1991 diagnosis, Charlson index scores of 0, 1, and 2+ had estimated relative hazards (RHs) with 95 confidence intervals (CIs) of 1.00, 1.33 (95% CI, 1.21-1.47), and 1.83 (95% CI, 1.64-2.05), respectively (P value for trend < 0.0001). The adjusted RH for a Charlson index score of 1 or more compared with 0, using stratified models, was found to be greater in whites (RH, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.43-1.67) than blacks (RH, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.96-1.60), local (RH, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.50-1.96) versus distant stage (RH, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.00-1.56), and age 65-74 years (RH, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.38-1.69) versus age 85+ years (RH, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09-1.84). This study establishes comorbidity as a predictor of survival in an elderly HNCA population and lends support to the inclusion of comorbidity assessment in prognostic staging of patients with HNCA diagnosed after 65 years of age. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                maxi
                Revista Española de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial
                Rev Esp Cirug Oral y Maxilofac
                Sociedad Española de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial y de Cabeza y Cuello (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                1130-0558
                2173-9161
                December 2020
                : 42
                : 4
                : 170-174
                Affiliations
                [1] Madrid orgnameHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal orgdiv1Servicio de Medicina Interna España
                [2] Madrid orgnameHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal orgdiv1Servicio de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial España
                [3] Alcalá de Henares Madrid orgnameUniversidad de Alcalá orgdiv1Área de Cirugía España
                Article
                S1130-05582020000400005 S1130-0558(20)04200400005
                10.20986/recom.2020.1178/2020
                e3c38510-acf2-4419-a391-78eb401eb8f5

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 19 October 2020
                : 18 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 25, Pages: 5
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Originales

                comanagement,Referral and consultation,Remisión y consulta,asistencia compartida,cirugía oral y maxilofacial,Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Internal Medicine,medicina interna

                Comments

                Comment on this article