6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement increases success rates in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis

      ,
      Pediatric Research
      Springer Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preventing complications of central venous catheterization.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement decreases complications and decreases placement attempts compared with the landmark technique in patients in a pediatric intensive care unit.

            To determine whether ultrasound (US) increases successful central venous catheter (CVC) placement, decreases site attempts, and decreases CVC placement complications. A prospective observational cohort study evaluating a transition by the Pediatric Critical Care Medicine service to US-guided CVC placement. Medical and surgical patients in a 21-bed quaternary multidisciplinary pediatric intensive care unit had CVCs placed by attendings, fellows, residents, and a nurse practitioner. Ninety-three patients were prospectively enrolled into the landmark (LM) group and 119 into the US group. : After collection of prospective LM data, training with US guidance was provided. CVCs were subsequently placed with US guidance. Operator information, disease process, emergent/routine, sites attempted, and complications were recorded. Procedure time was from initial skin puncture to guidewire placement. There was no difference overall in success rates (88.2% LM vs. 90.8% US, p = 0.54) or time to successful placement (median seconds 269 LM vs. 150 US, p = 0.14) between the two groups. Median number of attempts were fewer with US for all CVCs attempted (3 vs. 1, p 1 anatomical site (20.7% LM vs. 5.9% US, p = 0.001). Use of US was associated with fewer inadvertent artery punctures (8.5% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.03). Time to successful placement by residents was decreased with US (median 919 seconds vs. 405 seconds, p = 0.02). More internal jugular CVCs were placed during the US period than during the LM period (13.4% vs. 2.1%). US-guided CVC placement in children is associated with decreased number of anatomical sites attempted and decreased number of attempts to gain placement. Time to placement by residents was decreased with US, but not the time to placement by other operators. US guidance increased the use of internal jugular catheter placement and decreased artery punctures. US guidance did not improve success rates.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Real-time two-dimensional ultrasound guidance for central venous cannulation: a meta-analysis.

              Use of ultrasound-guided techniques to facilitate central venous cannulation (CVC) may reduce the risk of misplacement and complications. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare real-time two-dimensional ultrasound (RTUS) guidance technique with anatomical landmark technique for CVC to determine whether RTUS has any advantages.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pediatric Research
                Pediatr Res
                Springer Nature
                0031-3998
                1530-0447
                April 08 2016
                April 08 2016
                : 80
                : 2
                : 178-184
                Article
                10.1038/pr.2016.74
                27057741
                e41f8f53-51ce-49ba-8213-05b491d84476
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article