The prostaglandin cyclooxygenase (Cox) exists in two isoforms with different genetic representation. The isoform, which is constitutively expressed (Cox 1), and mediates physiological functions of prostaglandins, and the inducible isoform (Cox 2) which is upregulated by inflammatory stimuli. This study attempts to determine whether a Cox 2 selective inhibitor, flosulide, differs from the mixed type Cox 1 and Cox 2 inhibitor aspirin in respect of renal function and eicosanoid excretion in experimental nephritis. The effects of flosulide and aspirin were studied during the autologous phase of passive Heymann nephritis (PHN) in rats. Female Wistar rats were injected i.v. with 1 ml of Fx1A antiserum at day 1. From day 7 to day 14 they received either aspirin (aspirin, 50 mg/day), flosulide, (0.75 mg/day) or vehicle p.o. The kidney function was evaluated and the animals sacrificed. The kidneys were removed and glomeruli isolated. The glomeruli were incubated in physiological buffer solution. Basal prostaglandin generation was determined in the supernatant. Treatment with flosulide significantly reduced proteinuria as compared to aspirin treatment (64±15 vs. 109±14 mg/24 h, p < 0.05). Plasma protein and albumin levels were significantly lower in the aspirin-treated group than in flosulide-treated animals (4.7±0.26 vs. 5.48±0.08 mg/dl, p < 0.05 and 0.96±0.04 vs. 1.25±0.10 mg/dl, p < 0.05). Glomerular prostaglandin production (6-keto-PGF<sub>1α</sub>, TxB<sub>2</sub>, Bicyclo-PGE<sub>2</sub>) was significantly reduced in aspirin-, but not in flosulide-treated animals. This was mainly due to a reduction of glomerular TxB<sub>2</sub> production by aspirin. Our data demonstrate that a Cox 2 selective inhibitor of prostaglandin formation, flosulide, has beneficial effects on preservation of kidney function in rats with PHN, whereas aspirin has not. These beneficial effects of flosulide possibly result from preservation of the physiological glomerular prostaglandin production. Thus, selective Cox 2 inhibitors might be interesting substances for treatment of nephrotic syndrome.
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.