3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Real-World Treatment of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis per MS Subtype and Associated Healthcare Resource Use: An Analysis Based on 13,333 Patients in Germany

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The aim of this study was to describe the real-word treatment and associated healthcare resource use (HCRU) of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, as stratified by different MS subtypes.

          Methods

          All patients with MS continuously insured by two German statutory healthcare insurance funds from 2011 to 2015 were enrolled. These patients were categorized into four subgroups according to their MS type as follows: clinically isolated syndrome (CIS); relapsing remittent MS (RRMS); primary progressive MS (PPMS); and secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Sociodemographic characteristics, treatments, and HCRU for 2015 were analyzed. Treatment cascades for treatment-naïve patients were also determined.

          Results

          A total of 13,333 patients with MS were identified. The largest proportion of patients had RRMS (41.9%), followed by PPMS (17.1%). Mean age of the enrolled patients was 50.2 years, and 70.7% were female. Among all patients, 38.3% of those with CIS, 22.4% with PPMS, 69.6% with RRMS, and 33.9% with SPMS received a prescription of a disease-modifying immunomodulatory agent, with interferon beta-1a being the most frequently prescribed agent. Likewise, 14.5, 18.5, 19.9, and 21.5% of patients with CIS, PPMS, RRMS, and SPMS, respectively, received a flare-up treatment with glucocorticoids. MS-associated overall costs, including indirect costs for MS-associated days absent from work, were € 16,433, with costs related to MS medication (€ 8770; 53.4%) being the main driver of costs in all subgroups. MS-associated costs according to MS subtypes were € 12,427 for CIS patients, € 14,459 for PPMS patients, € 20,583 for RRMS patients, and € 17,554 for SPMS patients.

          Conclusion

          Among the four MS subtypes, RRMS patients most often received a disease-modifying immunomodulatory treatment. Consequently, healthcare costs were highest for patients with this MS subtype. Contrary to the treatment guideline, a substantial percentage of patients with CIS, RRMS, and SPMS did not receive any disease-modifying immunomodulatory treatment.

          Electronic Supplementary Material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s40120-019-00172-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          ECTRIMS/EAN Guideline on the pharmacological treatment of people with multiple sclerosis

          Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease with new drugs becoming available in the past years. There is a need for a reference tool compiling current data to aid professionals in treatment decisions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Practice guideline recommendations summary: Disease-modifying therapies for adults with multiple sclerosis

            Neurology, 90(17), 777-788
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Persistence with and adherence to fingolimod compared with other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims database analysis.

              Achieving therapeutic goals in multiple sclerosis (MS) requires strict adherence to treatment schedules. This retrospective study analyzed persistence with, and adherence to, fingolimod compared with injectable/infusible disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in patients with MS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sabrina.mueller@ipam-wismar.de
                Journal
                Neurol Ther
                Neurol Ther
                Neurology and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2193-8253
                2193-6536
                12 December 2019
                12 December 2019
                June 2020
                : 9
                : 1
                : 67-83
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.424707.2, Institute for Pharmacoeconomics and Medication Logistics (IPAM), , University of Wismar, ; Alter Holzhafen 19, 23966 Wismar, Germany
                [2 ]GWQ PLUS, Tersteegenstrasse 28, 40474 Düsseldorf, Germany
                [3 ]AOK PLUS, Rosa-Luxemburg-Straße 30, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
                [4 ]GRID grid.491710.a, ISNI 0000 0001 0339 5982, AOK Baden-Württemberg, ; Presselstraße 19, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
                [5 ]GRID grid.424277.0, Roche Pharma AG, ; Emil-Barell-Str.1, 79639 Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany
                Article
                172
                10.1007/s40120-019-00172-5
                7229080
                31832974
                e4503e36-2c82-43e4-95e8-f599a12ab703
                © The Author(s) 2019
                History
                : 9 August 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Roche Pharma AG
                Award ID: NA
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                claims data,costs,germany,hcru,multiple sclerosis,real-world treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article