17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Structurally Related Kappa Opioid Receptor Agonists with Substantial Differential Signaling Bias: Neuroendocrine and Behavioral Effects in C57BL6 Mice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The kappa opioid receptor system has been revealed as a potential pharmacotherapeutic target for the treatment of addictions to substances of abuse. Kappa opioid receptor agonists have been shown to block the rewarding and dopamine-releasing effects of psychostimulants. Recent investigations have profiled the in vivo effects of compounds biased towards G-protein-mediated signaling, with less potent arrestin-mediated signaling. The compounds studied here derive from a series of trialkylamines: N-substituted-N- phenylethyl-N-3-hydroxyphenylethyl-amine, with N-substituents including n-butyl (BPHA), methylcyclobutyl (MCBPHA), and methylcyclopentyl (MCPPHA).

          Methods

          BPHA, MCBPHA, and MCPPHA were characterized in vitro in a kappa opioid receptor-expressing cell line in binding assays and functional assays. We also tested the compounds in C57BL6 mice, assaying incoordination with rotarod, as well as circulating levels of the neuroendocrine kappa opioid receptor biomarker, prolactin.

          Results

          BPHA, MCBPHA, and MCPPHA showed full kappa opioid receptor agonism for G-protein coupling compared with the reference compound U69,593. BPHA showed no measurable β-arrestin-2 recruitment, indicating that it is extremely G-protein biased. MCBPHA and MCPPHA, however, showed submaximal efficacy for recruiting β-arrestin-2. Studies in C57BL6 mice reveal that all compounds stimulate release of prolactin, consistent with dependence on G-protein signaling. MCBPHA and MCPPHA result in rotarod incoordination, whereas BPHA does not, consistent with the reported requirement of intact kappa opioid receptor/β-arrestin-2 mediated coupling for kappa opioid receptor agonist-induced rotarod incoordination.

          Conclusions

          BPHA, MCBPHA, and MCPPHA are thus novel differentially G-protein-biased kappa opioid receptor agonists. They can be used to investigate how signaling pathways mediate kappa opioid receptor effects in vitro and in vivo and to explore the effects of candidate kappa opioid receptor-targeted pharmacotherapeutics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Operational models of pharmacological agonism.

          The traditional receptor-stimulus model of agonism began with a description of drug action based on the law of mass action and has developed by a series of modifications, each accounting for new experimental evidence. By contrast, in this paper an approach to modelling agonism is taken that begins with the observation that experimental agonist-concentration effect, E/[A], curves are commonly hyperbolic and develops using the deduction that the relation between occupancy and effect must be hyperbolic if the law of mass action applies at the agonist-receptor level. The result is a general model that explicitly describes agonism by three parameters: an agonist-receptor dissociation constant, KA; the total receptor concentration, [R0]; and a parameter, KE, defining the transduction of agonist-receptor complex, AR, into pharmacological effect. The ratio, [R0]/KE, described here as the 'transducer ratio', tau, is a logical definition for the efficacy of an agonist in a system. The model may be extended to account for non-hyperbolic E/[A] curves with no loss of meaning. Analysis shows that an explicit formulation of the traditional receptor-stimulus model is one particular form of the general model but that it is not the simplest. An alternative model is proposed, representing the cognitive and transducer functions of a receptor, that describes agonist action with one fewer parameter than the traditional model. In addition, this model provides a chemical definition of intrinsic efficacy making this parameter experimentally accessible in principle. The alternative models are compared and contrasted with regard to their practical and conceptual utilities in experimental pharmacology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A simple method for quantifying functional selectivity and agonist bias.

            Activation of seven-transmembrane (7TM) receptors by agonists does not always lead to uniform activation of all signaling pathways mediated by a given receptor. Relative to other ligands, many agonists are "biased" toward producing subsets of receptor behaviors. A hallmark of such "functional selectivity" is cell type dependence; this poses a particular problem for the profiling of agonists in whole cell test systems removed from the therapeutic one(s). Such response-specific cell-based variability makes it difficult to guide medicinal chemistry efforts aimed at identifying and optimizing therapeutically meaningful agonist bias. For this reason, we present a scale, based on the Black and Leff operational model, that contains the key elements required to describe 7TM agonism, namely, affinity (K(A) (-1)) for the receptor and efficacy (τ) in activating a particular signaling pathway. Utilizing a "transduction coefficient" term, log(τ/K(A)), this scale can statistically evaluate selective agonist effects in a manner that can theoretically inform structure-activity studies and/or drug candidate selection matrices. The bias of four chemokines for CCR5-mediated inositol phosphate production versus internalization is quantified to illustrate the practical application of this method. The independence of this method with respect to receptor density and the calculation of statistical estimates of confidence of differences are specifically discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Beta-arrestin-biased ligands at seven-transmembrane receptors.

              Seven-transmembrane receptors (7TMRs), the most common molecular targets of modern drug therapy, are critically regulated by beta-arrestins, which both inhibit classic G-protein signaling and initiate distinct beta-arrestin signaling. The interplay of G-protein and beta-arrestin signals largely determines the cellular consequences of 7TMR-targeted drugs. Until recently, a drug's efficacy for beta-arrestin recruitment was believed to be proportional to its efficacy for G-protein activities. This paradigm restricts 7TMR drug effects to a linear spectrum of responses, ranging from inhibition of all responses to stimulation of all responses. However, it is now clear that 'biased ligands' can selectively activate G-protein or beta-arrestin functions and thus elicit novel biological effects from even well-studied 7TMRs. Here, we discuss the current state of beta-arrestin-biased ligand research and the prospects for beta-arrestin bias as a therapeutic target. Consideration of ligand bias might have profound influences on the way scientists approach 7TMR-targeted drug discovery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Neuropsychopharmacol
                Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol
                ijnp
                International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1461-1457
                1469-5111
                September 2018
                04 April 2018
                04 April 2018
                : 21
                : 9
                : 847-857
                Affiliations
                Laboratory of the Biology of Addictive Diseases, Rockefeller University, New York, New York
                Author notes

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Correspondence: Amelia Dunn, BS, BA, 1230 York Ave, Box 243, New York, NY 10065 ( adunn@ 123456rockefeller.edu ).
                Article
                pyy034
                10.1093/ijnp/pyy034
                6119295
                29635340
                e46f892b-0d11-41c4-8295-a0888627ed6b
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 14 November 2017
                : 14 March 2018
                : 30 March 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: Robertson Therapeutic Development Fund
                Funded by: Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation 10.13039/100005984
                Categories
                Regular Research Articles

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                arrestin,gpcr,ligand bias,rotarod,prolactin
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                arrestin, gpcr, ligand bias, rotarod, prolactin

                Comments

                Comment on this article