9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Diversity partitioning in Phanerozoic benthic marine communities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Biotic interactions are drivers of biodiversity, yet their effects on Phanerozoic marine diversity remain elusive because they operate on small spatial scales. We provide the comprehensive reconstruction of within-community, between-community, and overall diversity on the scale of geological formations throughout the Phanerozoic eon to gauge the effects of biotic interactions on biodiversity. Within-community and overall diversity are positively correlated and both are practically unbounded. Between-community diversity drives overall diversity only at low levels of overall diversity, and mostly during the early- to mid-Paleozoic. Further increase of biodiversity is generally achieved by finer resource partitioning driven by positive species interactions.

          Abstract

          Biotic interactions such as competition, predation, and niche construction are fundamental drivers of biodiversity at the local scale, yet their long-term effect during earth history remains controversial. To test their role and explore potential limits to biodiversity, we determine within-habitat (alpha), between-habitat (beta), and overall (gamma) diversity of benthic marine invertebrates for Phanerozoic geological formations. We show that an increase in gamma diversity is consistently generated by an increase in alpha diversity throughout the Phanerozoic. Beta diversity drives gamma diversity only at early stages of diversification but remains stationary once a certain gamma level is reached. This mode is prevalent during early- to mid-Paleozoic periods, whereas coupling of beta and gamma diversity becomes increasingly weak toward the recent. Generally, increases in overall biodiversity were accomplished by adding more species to local habitats, and apparently this process never reached saturation during the Phanerozoic. Our results provide general support for an ecological model in which diversification occurs in successive phases of progressing levels of biotic interactions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes.

          The species richness (diversity) of local plant and animal assemblages-biological communities-balances regional processes of species formation and geographic dispersal, which add species to communities, against processes of predation, competitive exclusion, adaptation, and stochastic variation, which may promote local extinction. During the past three decades, ecologists have sought to explain differences in local diversity by the influence of the physical environment on local interactions among species, interactions that are generally believed to limit the number of coexisting species. But diversity of the biological community often fails to converge under similar physical conditions, and local diversity bears a demonstrable dependence upon regional diversity. These observations suggest that regional and historical processes, as well as unique events and circumstances, profoundly influence local community structure. Ecologists must broaden their concepts of community processes and incorporate data from systematics, biogeography, and paleontology into analyses of ecological patterns and tests of community theory.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators and grazers

            Tertiary and Recent marine gastropods include in their ranks a complement of mechanically sturdy forms unknown in earlier epochs. Open coiling, planispiral coiling, and umbilici detract from shell sturdiness, and were commoner among Paleozoic and Early Mesozoic gastropods than among younger forms. Strong external sculpture, narrow elongate apertures, and apertural dentition promote resistance to crushing predation and are primarily associated with post-Jurassic mesogastropods, neogastropods, and neritaceans. The ability to remodel the interior of the shell, developed primarily in gastropods with a non-nacreous shell structure, has contributed greatly to the acquisition of these antipredatory features.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Phanerozoic trends in the global diversity of marine invertebrates.

              It has previously been thought that there was a steep Cretaceous and Cenozoic radiation of marine invertebrates. This pattern can be replicated with a new data set of fossil occurrences representing 3.5 million specimens, but only when older analytical protocols are used. Moreover, analyses that employ sampling standardization and more robust counting methods show a modest rise in diversity with no clear trend after the mid-Cretaceous. Globally, locally, and at both high and low latitudes, diversity was less than twice as high in the Neogene as in the mid-Paleozoic. The ratio of global to local richness has changed little, and a latitudinal diversity gradient was present in the early Paleozoic.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                2 January 2019
                17 December 2018
                17 December 2018
                : 116
                : 1
                : 79-83
                Affiliations
                [1] aMuseum für Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science , 10115 Berlin, Germany
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: richard.hofmann@ 123456mfn.berlin .

                Edited by Peter J. Wagner, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Neil H. Shubin November 19, 2018 (received for review August 24, 2018)

                Author contributions: R.H. designed research; R.H. performed research; M.T. and M.A. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; R.H. and M.T. analyzed data; and R.H., M.T., and M.A. wrote the paper.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5829-8546
                Article
                201814487
                10.1073/pnas.1814487116
                6320541
                30559194
                e47e52cd-79fa-43bd-8074-8a338267fee3
                Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 5
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 501100001659
                Award ID: HO5624/2-1
                Award Recipient : Richard Hofmann
                Funded by: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF) 501100001711
                Award ID: 164635
                Award Recipient : Richard Hofmann
                Categories
                Physical Sciences
                Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences

                biodiversity,biotic interactions,beta diversity,alpha diversity,paleoecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article