4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine ( nab-P + G) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are among the most common first-line (1L) therapies for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (MPAC), but real-world data on their comparative effectiveness are limited.

          Methods

          This retrospective cohort study compared the efficacy and safety of 1L nab-P + G versus FFX, overall and under specific treatment sequences. Medical records were reviewed by 215 US physicians who provided information on MPAC patients who initiated 1L therapy with nab-P + G or FFX between April 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015. Study outcomes were overall survival (OS) and tolerability. OS was compared using Kaplan–Meier curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

          Results

          In total, 654 medical records were reviewed, including those of 337 and 317 patients initiated on nab-P + G and FFX as 1L MPAC therapy, respectively. nab-P + G-initiated patients were older, less likely to have ECOG ≤ 1, and had more comorbidities than FFX-initiated patients. Median OS (mOS) was 12.1 and 13.8 months for nab-P + G- and FFX-initiated patients, respectively (HR = 0.99, P = 0.96). Among patients with ECOG ≤ 1, mOS was 14.1 and 13.7 months, respectively (HR = 1.00, P = 0.99). Among patients with 1L nab-P + G and FFX, 36.1% and 41.3% received 2L therapy and experienced mOS of 16.3 and 16.6 months, respectively (HR = 1.04, P = 0.76). The rates of diarrhea, fatigue, mucositis, and nausea and vomiting were significantly higher in the FFX than nab-P + G cohort.

          Conclusion

          The real-world survival was similar between patients receiving 1L nab-P + G or FFX both overall and among patients who received active 2L treatments. In addition, nab-P + G was associated with significantly lower rates of common AEs compared with FFX.

          Funding

          Celgene.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0784-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Recent progress in pancreatic cancer.

          Pancreatic cancer is currently one of the deadliest of the solid malignancies. However, surgery to resect neoplasms of the pancreas is safer and less invasive than ever, novel drug combinations have been shown to improve survival, advances in radiation therapy have resulted in less toxicity, and enormous strides have been made in the understanding of the fundamental genetics of pancreatic cancer. These advances provide hope but they also increase the complexity of caring for patients. It is clear that multidisciplinary care that provides comprehensive and coordinated evaluation and treatment is the most effective way to manage patients with pancreatic cancer. Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

            To provide evidence-based recommendations to oncologists and others for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prognostic factors related with survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

              The prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer is poor and this cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Although surgical resection is the only curative treatment of choice for pancreatic cancer, the majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, thus only 10%-15% of them are suitable for curative resection and the overall survival is less than 5%. Chemotherapy for metastatic disease is to palliate symptoms of patients and to improve survival. Therefore, prognostic factors are important and a correct definition of poor prognostic factors may help to guide more aggressive adjuvant or aggressive treatment protocols in patients with pancreatic cancer. This article reviews the prognostic factors affecting survival of patients with pancreatic cancer in the light of recent advances in the literature.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Sunnie.Kim@gunet.georgetown.edu
                Journal
                Adv Ther
                Adv Ther
                Advances in Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                0741-238X
                1865-8652
                12 September 2018
                12 September 2018
                2018
                : 35
                : 10
                : 1564-1577
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8937 0972, GRID grid.411663.7, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, ; Washington, DC USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4660 9516, GRID grid.417986.5, Analysis Group, Inc., ; Boston, MA USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0461 1802, GRID grid.418722.a, Celgene Corporation, ; Summit, NJ USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1955 1644, GRID grid.213910.8, Ruesch Center for the Cure of GI Cancers, , Georgetown University, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, ; Washington, DC USA
                Article
                784
                10.1007/s12325-018-0784-z
                6182639
                30209750
                e485dc01-a74a-41fd-af92-cdea8302eeae
                © The Author(s) 2018
                History
                : 27 June 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006436, Celgene;
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

                adverse events,folfirinox,metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas,nab-paclitaxel,real-world evidence,survival analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article