26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Demand for emergency health service: factors associated with inappropriate use

      research-article
      1 , 2 , , 2 , 3
      BMC Health Services Research
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The inappropriate use of emergency room (ER) service by patients with non-urgent health problems is a worldwide problem. Inappropriate ER use makes it difficult to guarantee access for real emergency cases, decreases readiness for care, produces negative spillover effects on the quality of emergency services, and raises overall costs.

          Methods

          We conducted a cross-sectional study in a medium-sized city in southern Brazil. The urgency of the presenting complaint was defined according to the Hospital Urgencies Appropriateness Protocol (HUAP). Multivariable Poisson regression was carried out to examine factors associated with inappropriate ER use.

          Results

          The study interviewed 1,647 patients over a consecutive 13-day sampling period. The prevalence of inappropriate ER use was 24.2% (95% CI 22.1–26.3). Inappropriate ER use was inversely associated with age (P = 0.001), longer stay in the waiting room, longer duration of symptoms and morning shift. However, the determinants of inappropriate ER use differed according age groups (P value for interaction = 0.04). Within the younger age-group (15–49 years), inappropriate ER use was higher among females, patients who reported visiting the ER because there was no other place to go, patients reporting that the doctor at the regular place of care refused to attend to them without a prior appointment, and individuals who reported that the PHC clinic which they use is open for shorter periods during the day. Among older patients (50+ years), those with highest level of education, absence of self-reported chronic diseases and lack of social support were more likely to engage in higher inappropriate ER use.

          Conclusion

          Efforts should be made to redirect inappropriate ER demand. Besides expanding access to, and improving the quality of primary and secondary care, it is important to mobilize social support for older patients, to enhance the relationship between different levels of care, as well as to develop campaigns to educate the public about the appropriate use of medical services.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Emergency medical care in developing countries: is it worthwhile?

          Prevention is a core value of any health system. Nonetheless, many health problems will continue to occur despite preventive services. A significant burden of diseases in developing countries is caused by time-sensitive illnesses and injuries, such as severe infections, hypoxia caused by respiratory infections, dehydration caused by diarrhoea, intentional and unintentional injuries, postpartum bleeding, and acute myocardial infarction. The provision of timely treatment during life-threatening emergencies is not a priority for many health systems in developing countries. This paper reviews evidence indicating the need to develop and/or strengthen emergency medical care systems in these countries. An argument is made for the role of emergency medical care in improving the health of populations and meeting expectations for access to emergency care. We consider emergency medical care in the community, during transportation, and at first-contact and regional referral facilities. Obstacles to developing effective emergency medical care include a lack of structural models, inappropriate training foci, concerns about cost, and sustainability in the face of a high demand for services. A basic but effective level of emergency medical care responds to perceived and actual community needs and improves the health of populations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The validity of self-reported use of health care across socioeconomic strata: a comparison of survey and registration data.

            Socioeconomic differences in health and in use of health care are well known. Most data on socioeconomic differences in health care utilization are based on retrospective self-report in community surveys, but the evidence on the validity of self-reported utilization of health care across socioeconomic groups is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of self-reported utilization of health care across socioeconomic groups in the general population. We compared the concordance of self-reported and registered hospitalization (one year, n = 1277), and utilization of physiotherapy (one year, n = 1302) and use of prescription drugs (3 months, n = 899), by socioeconomic group (educational level, income, occupational status). Data came from a face-to-face health interview survey in Amsterdam and a health insurance register, and were limited to native Dutch and lower and middle income groups. Concordance between reported and registered utilization was generally good to excellent; kappas (agreement adjusted for chance agreement) and percentage accurately reporting ranged from 0.60 and 80% (drugs) to 0.80 and 96% (hospitalization). They differed little, and without statistical significance, between people of low socioeconomic status and others. Assessment of socioeconomic groups in more detail yields somewhat more variation, but no systematic trend in concordance by higher socioeconomic status. Self-report offers a reasonably valid estimate of differences in utilization of health care between socioeconomic groups in the general population, at least for lower and middle income groups.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Inappropriate use of an accident and emergency department: magnitude, associated factors, and reasons--an approach with explicit criteria.

              We evaluate the appropriateness of medical visits to the accident and emergency department (A&ED) of a university hospital using an instrument based on explicit and objective criteria, analyze the association between inappropriate visits and certain factors, and identify reasons for inappropriate use. This concurrent review of a random sample of 2,980 adult medical patients' visits to the A&ED of the hospital of Elche uses the Hospital Urgencies Appropriateness Protocol, an instrument based on explicit criteria. We analyze the association between inappropriate use and specific factors, and provide a descriptive analysis of reasons for inappropriate use assigned by A&ED staff. Of the total number, 882 (29.6%) of the visits were evaluated as inappropriate. Inappropriate use was associated with younger patients, use of own means of transportation, referral by the hospital, certain months of the year, and certain diagnostic groups of lesser severity. The most frequent reasons for inappropriate use were the patients' greater trust in the hospital than primary care (451 [51.1%]), inappropriate use of services by patients (160 [18.1%]), and inappropriate referrals by primary care physicians (142 [16.1%]). Inappropriate use represents an important percentage of use of the A&ED. Many reasons contribute to it, although foremost among them is patient preference (and the convenience and accessibility) of these services compared with primary care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                2007
                18 August 2007
                : 7
                : 131
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Public Health, Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil, Rua Félix da Cunha, 412, 96010-000, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
                [2 ]Department of Social Medicine, Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil, Av. Duque de Caxias, 250 - 3 rd floor, 96030-002, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
                [3 ]Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Kresge Building 7 th Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                Article
                1472-6963-7-131
                10.1186/1472-6963-7-131
                2034385
                17705873
                e49d4c94-aa05-4ee0-b101-e00be34c9517
                Copyright © 2007 Carret et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 November 2006
                : 18 August 2007
                Categories
                Research Article

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article