PREDICTING URINARY INCONTINENCE AFTER SURGERY FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE

Abstract

Purpose of review

Many women choosing to have surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) also choose to undergo continence surgery. This review focuses on available evidence that clinicians may use to counsel patients when choosing whether to perform continence surgery and how predictive analytic tools improve this decision making process.

Recent findings

Mid-urethral sling, Burch cystourethropexy and bladder neck sling are highly effective for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Trials demonstrate that continence surgery may be routinely performed to reduce the risk of postoperative incontinence in women undergoing surgery for POP with or without preoperative SUI. Although these procedures are effective and safe on average, media concerns, regulatory warnings, and litigation reinforce the need for a balanced discussion regarding efficacy and potential adverse events directed at the individual patient during the preoperative visit. Advances in predictive analytics allow surgeons to quantitate individual risk using algorithms that tailor estimates for the individual patient and facilitate shared understanding of risks and benefits. These models are less prone to cognitive biases and frequently outperform experienced clinicians.

Summary

This review discusses how predictive analytic tools can be used to improve decisions about continence surgery in the woman planning to undergo prolapse surgery.