31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A lack-of-fit test for quantile regression models with high-dimensional covariates

      Preprint

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We propose a new lack-of-fit test for quantile regression models that is suitable even with high-dimensional covariates. The test is based on the cumulative sum of residuals with respect to unidimensional linear projections of the covariates. The test adapts concepts proposed by Escanciano (Econometric Theory, 22, 2006) to cope with many covariates to the test proposed by He and Zhu (Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 2003). To approximate the critical values of the test, a wild bootstrap mechanism is used, similar to that proposed by Feng et al. (Biometrika, 98, 2011). An extensive simulation study was undertaken that shows the good performance of the new test, particularly when the dimension of the covariate is high. The test can also be applied and performs well under heteroscedastic regression models. The test is illustrated with real data about the economic growth of 161 countries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Goodness of Fit and Related Inference Processes for Quantile Regression

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bootstrap and Wild Bootstrap for High Dimensional Linear Models

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Nonparametric model checks for regression

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                1502.05815

                Methodology
                Methodology

                Comments

                Comment on this article