19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Collaborative Facilitation in Older Couples: Successful Joint Remembering Across Memory Tasks

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although we know a great deal about the effects of age on memory, we know less about how couples remember together and how day-to-day joint remembering might support memory performance. The possibility of memory support when couples remember together is in striking contrast with the standard finding from the collaborative recall literature that when younger pairs of strangers remember together they impair each other’s recall. In the current study, we examined the individual and joint remembering of 78 individuals who made up 39 older, long-married couples. We studied their performance on three memory tasks, varying in personal relevance: recalling a word list, listing all the countries in Europe, and remembering the names of their mutual friends. Couples gained clear collaborative benefits when they remembered together compared to when alone, especially European countries and mutual friends. Importantly, collaborative success was extremely stable over time, with good collaborators still successful 2 years later, suggesting that successful collaboration may be a stable couple-level difference. However, not all couples benefitted equally. Collaborative success related in part to particular conversational strategies that some couples, often those with discrepant individual abilities, used when collaborating. These findings highlight the value of analyzing individuals within their broader “memory systems” and the power of extending collaborative recall methods to more established intimate groups recalling a broader range of memory materials over longer time scales.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Hopkins Verbal Learning Test ? Revised: Normative Data and Analysis of Inter-Form and Test-Retest Reliability

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type.

            J Morris (1997)
            Global staging measures for dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) assess the influence of cognitive loss on the ability to conduct everyday activities and represent the "ultimate test" of efficacy for antidementia drug trials. They provide information about clinically meaningful function and behavior and are less affected by the "floor" and "ceiling" effects commonly associated with psychometric tests. The Washington University Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is a global scale developed to clinically denote the presence of DAT and stage its severity. The clinical protocol incorporates semistructured interviews with the patient and informant to obtain information necessary to rate the subject's cognitive performance in six domains: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. The CDR has been standardized for multicenter use, including the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) and the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study, and interrater reliability has been established. Criterion validity for both the global CDR and scores on individual domains has been demonstrated, and the CDR also has been validated neuropathologically, particularly for the presence or absence of dementia. Standardized training protocols are available. Although not well suited as a brief screening tool for population surveys of dementia because the protocol depends on sufficient time to conduct interviews, the CDR has become widely accepted in the clinical setting as a reliable and valid global assessment measure for DAT.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing Intimacy: The Pair Inventory

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                04 December 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 2385
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Macquarie University , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [2] 2Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [3] 3Dementia Centre, HammondCare , Greenwich, NSW, Australia
                [4] 4Department of Psychology, Macquarie University , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Claudia Repetto, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy

                Reviewed by: Pietro Spataro, La Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Sarah E. MacPherson, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

                *Correspondence: Amanda J. Barnier, amanda.barnier@ 123456mq.edu.au

                This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02385
                6288253
                30564169
                e4d51f39-271e-42d8-83ff-e254956bffef
                Copyright © 2018 Barnier, Harris, Morris and Savage.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 July 2018
                : 12 November 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 46, Pages: 12, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                memory,collaborative recall,collaborative facilitation,memory and aging,transactive memory,distributed cognition

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log