18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients With Autoantibodies: Is It Effective and Safe Without Increasing Hemolysis Risk?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The therapeutic efficacy of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is highly debated because of speculations on the increased risk of transfusion reactions; yet it is a suggested adjuvant therapy in anemic patients with life-threatening hypoxemia. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of RBC transfusions in AIHA patients.

          Methods

          Daily changes in hemoglobin, total bilirubin, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were assessed in 161 AIHA patients without bleeding history who were transfused once with 1-5 units of the least-incompatible RBCs and monitored over a seven-day period. Post-transfusion patients positive for alloantibodies only or those without RBC-specific antibodies were considered as control groups (N=100 for both groups).

          Results

          The three groups revealed similar increases in hemoglobin of 1.40-1.70 g/dL (autoantibodies), 1.20-1.60 g/dL (alloantibodies only), and 1.40-1.55 g/dL (no antibodies) for seven days following transfusion of 10 mL RBCs/kg. During follow-up, no significant changes in total bilirubin or LDH levels were detected in the AIHA group compared with controls. Influences due to autoantibody type, direct antiglobulin test (DAT) specificity and strength, and steroid therapy status on transfusion reactions were not evident in AIHA patients. In addition, changes in hemoglobin levels were significantly higher ( P<0.001) in severe anemia (<5 g/dL) than in other patients.

          Conclusions

          Transfusion of the least-incompatible RBCs in AIHA patients is effective and safe without any associated increase in hemolysis risk when compared with post-transfusion patients positive for alloantibodies or those lacking RBC-specific antibodies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Autoimmune hemolytic anemia.

          Red blood cell (RBC) autoantibodies are a relatively uncommon cause of anemia. However, autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) must be considered in the differential diagnosis of hemolytic anemias, especially if the patient has a concomitant lymphoproliferative disorder, autoimmune disease, or viral or mycoplasmal infection. Classifications of AIHA include warm AIHA, cold agglutinin syndrome, paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria, mixed-type AIHA, and drug-induced AIHA. Characteristics of the autoantibodies are responsible for the various clinical entities. As a result, diagnosis is based on the clinical presentation and a serologic work-up. For each classification of AIHA, this review discusses the demographics, etiology, clinical presentation, laboratory evaluation, and treatment options. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hemolytic anemia due to warm autoantibodies.

            The diagnosis of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AHA) requires evidence of shortened red blood cell (RBC) survival mediated by autoantibodies directed against autologous RBCs. About 80 percent of patients with AHA have warm-reactive antibodies of the IgG isotype; the remainder exhibit cold-reactive autoantibodies. Typical patients exhibit anemia, reticulocytosis, spherocytes and polychromasia on the blood film and a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT). Increased indirect serum bilirubin, urinary urobilinogen and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and decreased serum haptoglobin are not required for the diagnosis, but are frequently present. Patients with AHA and no underlying associated disease are said to have primary or idiopathic AHA. AHA in patients with associated autoimmune disease and certain malignant or infectious diseases is classified as secondary. The etiology of AHA is unknown. Patients with symptomatic anemia require transfusion of RBCs. Prednisone and splenectomy may provide long term remission. Rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, immunosuppressive drugs and danazol have been effective in refractory cases and for patients who are poor candidates for surgery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia: recent progress in understanding the immunobiology and the treatment.

              Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is defined as a condition associated with the increased destruction of red blood cells (RBCs) associated with the presence of IgG anti-RBC autoantibodies. The etiology underlying the pathogenesis of such autoantibodies is still uncertain. In the present article, we will discuss the postulated mechanisms that produce a breakdown of immunologic tolerance leading to warm AIHA including the possible roles of RBC autoantigens and the complement system, the lack of effective presentation of autoantigens, functional abnormalities of B and T cells resulting in polyclonal lymphocyte activation and alteration of cytokine production, and the role of immunoregulatory T cells. Because warm AIHA is a relatively rare clinical entity, current recommended therapeutic strategies for patients with warm AIHA are mainly based on results from small cohort studies. Clinicians must also balance the risk of withholding RBC transfusions against the possible benefit of ameliorating the hemoglobin level with such transfusions particularly in critically ill patients with warm AIHA. Glucocorticoids are the first-line treatment for patients with warm AIHA resulting in an 80% clinical response after 3 weeks of treatment. The latter, however, also may cause adverse events such as excessive weight gain, neuropsychiatric disorders, endocrine, or cardiovascular events. Splenectomy should be considered for patients who do not show a satisfactory response to glucocorticoids and may offer a success rate of up to 70% in patients with idiopathic warm AIHA. Rituximab treatment in patients with refractory warm AIHA has been well tolerated with an overall median response rate of approximately 60%. Danazol, intravenous immunoglobulin, alemtuzumab, as well as other immunosuppressive drugs have also been successfully used in patients with warm AIHA, refractory to glucocorticoids, splenectomy, and rituximab. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Lab Med
                Ann Lab Med
                ALM
                Annals of Laboratory Medicine
                The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
                2234-3806
                2234-3814
                July 2015
                21 May 2015
                : 35
                : 4
                : 436-444
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Laboratory Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
                [2 ]Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
                [3 ]Department of Laboratory Medicine, Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
                [4 ]Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Seog-Woon Kwon. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3010-4504, Fax: +82-2-478-0884, swkwon@ 123456amc.seoul.kr
                Article
                10.3343/alm.2015.35.4.436
                4446583
                26131416
                e4d84f92-11af-466e-9dce-1723662bcba5
                © The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 04 November 2014
                : 16 January 2015
                : 23 April 2015
                Categories
                Original Article
                Transfusion Medicine

                Clinical chemistry
                autoantibodies,effectiveness,hemolysis,red blood cell,safety,transfusion
                Clinical chemistry
                autoantibodies, effectiveness, hemolysis, red blood cell, safety, transfusion

                Comments

                Comment on this article