6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Oral Systemic Bioavailability of Bisphenol A and Bisphenol S in Pigs

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Given its hormonal activity, bisphenol S (BPS) as a substitute for bisphenol A (BPA) could actually increase the risk of endocrine disruption if its toxicokinetic (TK) properties, namely its oral availability and systemic persistency, were higher than those of BPA.

          Objectives:

          The TK behavior of BPA and BPS was investigated by administering the two compounds by intravenous and oral routes in piglet, a known valid model for investigating oral TK.

          Methods:

          Experiments were conducted in piglets to evaluate the kinetics of BPA, BPS, and their glucuronoconjugated metabolites in plasma and urine after intravenous administration of BPA, BPS, and BPS glucuronide (BPSG) and gavage administration of BPA and BPS. A population semiphysiologically based TK model describing the disposition of BPA and BPS and their glucuronides was built from these data to estimate the key TK parameters that drive the internal exposure to active compounds.

          Results:

          The data indicated that almost all the BPS oral dose was absorbed and transported into the liver where only 41% of BPS was glucuronidated, leading to a systemic bioavailability of 57.4%. In contrast, only 77% of the oral dose of BPA was absorbed and underwent an extensive first-pass glucuronidation either in the gut (44%) or in the liver (53%), thus accounting for the low systemic bioavailability of BPA (0.50%). Due to the higher systemic availability of BPS, in comparison with BPA, and its lower plasma clearance (3.5 times lower), the oral BPS systemic exposure was on average about 250 times higher than for BPA for an equal oral molar dose of the two compounds.

          Conclusion:

          Given the similar digestive tracts of pigs and humans, our results suggest that replacing BPA with BPS will likely lead to increased internal exposure to an endocrine-active compound that would be of concern for human health. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4599

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals.

          In addition to metabolic differences, the anatomical, physiological, and biochemical differences in the gastrointestinal (G.I.) tract of the human and common laboratory animals can cause significant variation in drug absorption from the oral route. Among the physiological factors, pH, bile, pancreatic juice, and mucus and fluid volume and content can modify dissolution rates, solubility, transit times, and membrane transport of drug molecules. The microbial content of the G.I. tract can significantly affect the reductive metabolism and enterohepatic circulation of drugs and colonic delivery of formulations. The transit time of dosage forms can be significantly different between species due to different dimensions and propulsive activities of the G.I. tract. The lipid/protein composition of the enterocyte membrane along the G.I. tract can alter binding and passive, active, and carrier-mediated transport of drugs. The location and number of Peyer's patches can also be important in the absorption of large molecules and particulate matter. While small animals, rats, mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits, are most suitable for determining the mechanism of drug absorption and bioavailability values from powder or solution formulations, larger animals, dogs, pigs, and monkeys, are used to assess absorption from formulations. The understanding of physiological, anatomical, and biochemical differences between the G.I. tracts of different animal species can lead to the selection of the correct animal model to mimic the bioavailability of compounds in the human. This article reviews the anatomical, physiological, and biochemical differences between the G.I. tracts of humans and commonly used laboratory animals.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Scientific Opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol A (BPA) in foodstuffs

            (2015)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A new chapter in the bisphenol A story: bisphenol S and bisphenol F are not safe alternatives to this compound.

              Bisphenol A (BPA) is a widely studied typical endocrine-disrupting chemical, and one of the major new issues is the safe replacement of this commonly used compound. Bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF) are already or are planned to be used as BPA alternatives. With the use of a culture system that we developed (fetal testis assay [FeTA]), we previously showed that 10 nmol/L BPA reduces basal testosterone secretion of human fetal testis explants and that the susceptibility to BPA is at least 100-fold lower in rat and mouse fetal testes. Here, we show that addition of LH in the FeTA system considerably enhances BPA minimum effective concentration in mouse and human but not in rat fetal testes. Then, using the FeTA system without LH (the experimental conditions in which mouse and human fetal testes are most sensitive to BPA), we found that, as for BPA, 10 nmol/L BPS or BPF is sufficient to decrease basal testosterone secretion by human fetal testes with often nonmonotonic dose-response curves. In fetal mouse testes, the dose-response curves were mostly monotonic and the minimum effective concentrations were 1,000 nmol/L for BPA and BPF and 100 nmol/L for BPS. Finally, 10,000 nmol/L BPA, BPS, or BPF reduced Insl3 expression in cultured mouse fetal testes. This is the first report describing BPS and BPF adverse effects on a physiologic function in humans and rodents.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environ Health Perspect
                Environ. Health Perspect
                EHP
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                0091-6765
                1552-9924
                17 July 2019
                July 2019
                : 127
                : 7
                : 077005
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Toxalim, Université de Toulouse, INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique), INP (Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse)–ENVT (Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse) , Toulouse France
                [2 ]Université de Toulouse, ENVT (Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse), EIP (Ecole d’Ingénieurs de Purpan), UPS (Université Paul Sabatier) , Toulouse, France
                [3 ]Therapeutic Innovations and Resistance (INTHERES), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT , Toulouse, France
                [4 ]Département de santé environnementale et santé au travail, Institut de recherche en santé publique de l'Université de Montréal (IRSPUM), Université de Montréal , Montréal, Canada
                [5 ]EA 3694 Human Fertility Research Group, Toulouse University Hospital , Toulouse, France
                [6 ]The Royal Veterinary College, University of London , London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to V. Gayrard, UMR1331 Toxalim, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, Laboratoire de Physiologie, 23 chemin des Capelles, BP 87614, 31076 Toulouse cedex 3, France. Email: v.gayrard@ 123456envt.fr
                Article
                EHP4599
                10.1289/EHP4599
                6792350
                31313948
                e50a1961-45bc-4223-9769-d4d712006a1c

                EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted.

                History
                : 16 October 2018
                : 14 May 2019
                : 13 June 2019
                Categories
                Research

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article