13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High efficacy of a dimeticone-based pediculicide following a brief application: in vitro assays and randomized controlled investigator-blinded clinical trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Increasing resistance of head lice against neurotoxic agents and safety concerns have led to the search for treatment alternatives. Dimeticones with a physical mode of action are safe, and bear a reduced risk for the development of resistance.

          Methods

          We performed in vitro bioassays to assess pediculicidal and ovicidal activities of a new dimeticone-based product, and a randomized controlled clinical trial to assess efficacy, following 10 min application. Of 153 individuals screened, 100 participants with active head louse infestations were randomly assigned to treatment with either a dimeticone-based test product, or a 0.5% permethrin-based reference product (50 participants per group). Participants received two topical applications of either the test (10 min) or reference products (45 min) at days 0 and 7 or 8. Outcome measures included the efficacies of treatment and their safety, as well as global and local tolerability at baseline, and days 1, 7, and 10.

          Results

          After 10 min exposure, all lice treated with the dimeticone test product were classified as non-viable in the in vitro assay. Ovicidal activity after treatment of eggs with the dimeticone test product was 96.8%. In the clinical trial, 96 patients completed all study visits. In the full analysis set (FAS) population, on day 1 after one application, 98% of patients were cured in the test group, as compared to 84% cured in the reference group. All participants in both groups were free of head lice on day 10, following two applications (100% cure rate). In total, 42 adverse events (AEs) in 23 patients of both treatment groups were recorded, with the majority of AEs classified as mild.

          Conclusions

          We have shown a high level of pediculicidal and ovicidal activity, and clinical efficacy and safety, of a brief application of a new dimeticone-based product. The short application time and reduced risk for the development of resistance are key drivers for improved patients’ compliance.

          Trial registration

          EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT  2016–004635-20. Registered 14 November 2016.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Epidermal parasitic skin diseases: a neglected category of poverty-associated plagues.

          Epidermal parasitic skin diseases (EPSD) are a heterogeneous category of infectious diseases in which parasite-host interactions are confined to the upper layer of the skin. The six major EPSD are scabies, pediculosis (capitis, corporis and pubis), tungiasis and hookworm-related cutaneous larva migrans. We summarize the current knowledge on EPSD and show that these diseases are widespread, polyparasitism is common, and significant primary and secondary morbidity occurs. We show that poverty favours the presence of animal reservoirs, ensures ongoing transmission, facilitates atypical methods of spreading infectious agents and increases the chances of exposure. This results in an extraordinarily high prevalence and intensity of infestation of EPSD in resource-poor populations. Stigma, lack of access to health care and deficient behaviour in seeking health care are the reasons why EPSD frequently progress untreated and why in resource-poor populations severe morbidity is common. The ongoing uncontrolled urbanization in many developing countries makes it likely that EPSD will remain the overriding parasitic diseases for people living in extreme poverty. We advocate integrating control of EPSD into intervention measures directed against other neglected diseases such as filariasis and intestinal helminthiases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Treatment of head louse infestation with 4% dimeticone lotion: randomised controlled equivalence trial.

            To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4% dimeticone lotion for treatment of head louse infestation. Randomised controlled equivalence trial. Community, with home visits. 214 young people aged 4 to 18 years and 39 adults with active head louse infestation. Two applications seven days apart of either 4.0% dimeticone lotion, applied for eight hours or overnight, or 0.5% phenothrin liquid, applied for 12 hours or overnight. Cure of infestation (no evidence of head lice after second treatment) or reinfestation after cure. Cure or reinfestation after cure occurred in 89 of 127 (70%) participants treated with dimeticone and 94 of 125 (75%) treated with phenothrin (difference -5%, 95% confidence interval -16% to 6%). Per protocol analysis showed that 84 of 121 (69%) participants were cured with dimeticone and 90 of 116 (78%) were cured with phenothrin. Irritant reactions occurred significantly less with dimeticone (3/127, 2%) than with phenothrin (11/125, 9%; difference -6%, -12% to -1%). Per protocol this was 3 of 121 (3%) participants treated with dimeticone and 10 of 116 (9%) treated with phenothrin (difference -6%, -12% to -0.3%). Dimeticone lotion cures head louse infestation. Dimeticone seems less irritant than existing treatments and has a physical action on lice that should not be affected by resistance to neurotoxic insecticides.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A highly efficacious pediculicide based on dimeticone: Randomized observer blinded comparative trial

              Background Infestation with the human head louse (Pediculus humanus capitis) occurs worldwide. Existing treatment options are limited, and reports of resistance to commonly used pediculicides have been increasing. In this trial we assessed the efficacy of a product containing a high (92%) concentration of the silicone oil dimeticone (identical in composition to NYDA®), as compared to a 1% permethrin lotion. Methods Randomized, controlled, observer blinded clinical trial. Participants were recruited from a poor urban neighbourhood in Brazil where pediculosis capitis was highly prevalent. To minimize reinfestation during the trial, participants (145 children aged 5–15 years with head lice infestations) were transferred to a holiday resort outside the endemic area for a period of 9 days. Two applications of dimeticone or 1% permethrin were done, seven days apart. Outcome measures were defined as cure (absence of vital head lice) after first application and before and after second applications, degree of itching, cosmetic acceptability, and clinical pathology. Results Overall cure rates were: day 2 – dimeticone 94.5% (95% CI: 86.6% – 98.5%) and permethrin 66.7% (95% CI: 54.6% – 77.3%; p < 0.0001); day 7 – dimeticone 64.4% (95% CI: 53.3% – 75.3%) and permethrin 59.7% (95% CI: 47.5% – 71.1%; p = 0.5); day 9 – dimeticone 97.2% (95% CI: 90.3% – 99.7%) and permethrin 67.6% (95% CI: 55.4%-78.2%); p < 0.0001). Itching was reduced similarly in both groups. Cosmetic acceptability was significantly better in the dimeticone group as compared to the permethrin group (p = 0.01). Two mild product-related incidents occurred in the dimeticone group. Conclusion The dimeticone product is a safe and highly efficacious pediculicide. Due to its physical mode of action (interruption of the lice's oxygen supply of the central nervous system), development of resistance is unlikely. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15117709.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                heukelbach@web.de
                doerte.wolf@cardiosec.de
                jclark@vasci.umass.edu
                dautel@insectservices.de
                k.roeschmann@pohl-boskamp.de
                Journal
                BMC Dermatol
                BMC Dermatol
                BMC Dermatology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-5945
                18 October 2019
                18 October 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 14
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2160 0329, GRID grid.8395.7, Department of Community Health, School of Medicine, , Federal University of Ceará, ; Rua Professor Costa Mendes 1608, 5. andar, Fortaleza, CE 60430-140 Brazil
                [2 ]GRID grid.491612.9, CardioSec Clinical Research GmbH, ; Dalbergsweg 21, 99084 Erfurt, Germany
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2184 9220, GRID grid.266683.f, Department of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Massachusetts Pesticide Analysis Lab, , University of Massachusetts Amherst, ; Amherst, MA 01003 USA
                [4 ]IS Insect Services GmbH, Motzener Straße 6, 12277 Berlin, Germany
                [5 ]G. Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co. KG, Kieler Straße 11, 25551 Hohenlockstedt, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7845-5510
                Article
                94
                10.1186/s12895-019-0094-4
                6806501
                31647007
                e54783ba-c5a4-456d-b9db-0b90adb7d4c2
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 25 April 2019
                : 20 September 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co. KG
                Award ID: n/a
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Dermatology
                clinical trial,head lice,body lice,dimeticone,pediculicidal activity,ovicidal activity
                Dermatology
                clinical trial, head lice, body lice, dimeticone, pediculicidal activity, ovicidal activity

                Comments

                Comment on this article