Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: not found
  • Article: not found

Multiple agree with clitics: person complementarity vs. omnivorous number

Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

Springer Nature

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Related collections

      Most cited references 35

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis

        Bookmark
        • Record: found
        • Abstract: not found
        • Article: not found

        Head Movement in Linguistic Theory

          Bookmark
          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Agreement and movement: a syntactic analysis of attraction.

          This paper links experimental psycholinguistics and theoretical syntax in the study of subject-verb agreement. Three experiments of elicited spoken production making use of specific characteristics of Italian and French are presented. They manipulate and examine its impact on the occurrence of 'attraction' errors (i.e. incorrect agreement with a word that is not the subject of the sentence). Experiment 1 (in Italian) shows that subject modifiers do not trigger attraction errors in free inverted VS (Verb Subject) structures, although attraction was found in VS interrogatives in English (Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J. (1998). Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production. Is proximity concord syntactic or linear? Cognition, 13-29) In Experiment 2 (in French), we report stronger attraction with preverbal clitic object pronouns than with subject modifiers. Experiment 3 (in French) shows that displaced direct objects in the cleft construction trigger attraction effects, in spite of the fact that the object does not intervene between the subject and the verb in the surface word order (OSV). Moreover, attraction is stronger in structures with subject-verb inversion (...). These observations are shown to be naturally interpretable through the tools of formal syntax, as elaborated within the Principles and Parameters/Minimalist tradition. Three important constructs are discussed: (1) the hierarchical representation of the sentence during syntactic construction, and the role of intermediate positions by which words transit when they move; (2) the role of specific hierarchical (c-command) but also linear (precedence) relations; and (3) the possibility that agreement involves two functionally distinct components. A gradient of computational complexity in agreement is presented which relates empirical evidence to these theoretical constructs.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
            Nat Lang Linguist Theory
            Springer Nature
            0167-806X
            1573-0859
            November 2011
            October 20 2011
            November 2011
            : 29
            : 4
            : 939-971
            10.1007/s11049-011-9150-4
            © 2011
            Product

            Comments

            Comment on this article