14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Motivational salience drives habitual gazes during value memory retention and facilitates relearning of forgotten value

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          A habitual gaze is critical to efficiently identify and exploit valuable objects. However, it is unclear what salience components drive the habitual gaze choice. Here, we trained subjects to assign positive, neutral, and negative values to objects and found that motivational salience guided habitual gaze choices over 30 days of memory retention. The habitual preference for negatively valued objects emerged during memory retention. This habitual choice was not explained by a general model with salience components driven by physical features of objects and the rank of learned values. Instead, this is better explained by a model that contains an additional component driven by motivational salience. In a simulated value-forgotten condition, these motivational salience-based habitual choices facilitated re-learning. Our data indicate that after long-term retention, habitual gaze results from increased motivational salience, potentially facilitating the re-learning of forgotten values.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • Habitual preference for negatively valued objects emerged during long-term retention

          • Changes in habitual preference were driven by 3 salience components over time

          • Preference for negatively valued objects facilitates re-learning of forgotten values

          Abstract

          Neuroscience; Sensory neuroscience; Cognitive neuroscience

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A circumplex model of affect.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain.

            Scientists in many different fields have been attracted to the study of habits because of the power habits have over behavior and because they invoke a dichotomy between the conscious, voluntary control over behavior, considered the essence of higher-order deliberative behavioral control, and lower-order behavioral control that is scarcely available to consciousness. A broad spectrum of behavioral routines and rituals can become habitual and stereotyped through learning. Others have a strong innate basis. Repetitive behaviors can also appear as cardinal symptoms in a broad range of neurological and neuropsychiatric illness and in addictive states. This review suggests that many of these behaviors could emerge as a result of experience-dependent plasticity in basal ganglia-based circuits that can influence not only overt behaviors but also cognitive activity. Culturally based rituals may reflect privileged interactions between the basal ganglia and cortically based circuits that influence social, emotional, and action functions of the brain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience.

              Models of gaze allocation in complex scenes are derived mainly from studies of static picture viewing. The dominant framework to emerge has been image salience, where properties of the stimulus play a crucial role in guiding the eyes. However, salience-based schemes are poor at accounting for many aspects of picture viewing and can fail dramatically in the context of natural task performance. These failures have led to the development of new models of gaze allocation in scene viewing that address a number of these issues. However, models based on the picture-viewing paradigm are unlikely to generalize to a broader range of experimental contexts, because the stimulus context is limited, and the dynamic, task-driven nature of vision is not represented. We argue that there is a need to move away from this class of model and find the principles that govern gaze allocation in a broader range of settings. We outline the major limitations of salience-based selection schemes and highlight what we have learned from studies of gaze allocation in natural vision. Clear principles of selection are found across many instances of natural vision and these are not the principles that might be expected from picture-viewing studies. We discuss the emerging theoretical framework for gaze allocation on the basis of reward maximization and uncertainty reduction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                iScience
                iScience
                iScience
                Elsevier
                2589-0042
                08 September 2022
                21 October 2022
                08 September 2022
                : 25
                : 10
                : 105104
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University (SNU), Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author hfkim@ 123456snu.ac.kr
                [2]

                These authors contributed equally

                [3]

                Lead contact

                Article
                S2589-0042(22)01376-1 105104
                10.1016/j.isci.2022.105104
                9519605
                36185371
                e5728799-e2e5-43f8-b6c2-f19ac3e35e00
                © 2022 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 14 January 2022
                : 8 May 2022
                : 7 September 2022
                Categories
                Article

                neuroscience,sensory neuroscience,cognitive neuroscience

                Comments

                Comment on this article