22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Optimality of the genetic code with respect to protein stability and amino-acid frequencies

      research-article
      1 , , 3 , 2 , 1 , 3
      Genome Biology
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The genetic code is known to be efficient in limiting the effect of mistranslation errors. A misread codon often codes for the same amino acid or one with similar biochemical properties, so the structure and function of the coded protein remain relatively unaltered. Previous studies have attempted to address this question quantitatively, by estimating the fraction of randomly generated codes that do better than the genetic code in respect of overall robustness. We extended these results by investigating the role of amino-acid frequencies in the optimality of the genetic code.

          Results

          We found that taking the amino-acid frequency into account decreases the fraction of random codes that beat the natural code. This effect is particularly pronounced when more refined measures of the amino-acid substitution cost are used than hydrophobicity. To show this, we devised a new cost function by evaluating in silico the change in folding free energy caused by all possible point mutations in a set of protein structures. With this function, which measures protein stability while being unrelated to the code's structure, we estimated that around two random codes in a billion (10 9) are fitter than the natural code. When alternative codes are restricted to those that interchange biosynthetically related amino acids, the genetic code appears even more optimal.

          Conclusions

          These results lead us to discuss the role of amino-acid frequencies and other parameters in the genetic code's evolution, in an attempt to propose a tentative picture of primitive life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The origin of the genetic code.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Dominant forces in protein folding.

            K A Dill (1990)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The genetic code is one in a million.

              Statistical and biochemical studies of the genetic code have found evidence of nonrandom patterns in the distribution of codon assignments. It has, for example, been shown that the code minimizes the effects of point mutation or mistranslation: erroneous codons are either synonymous or code for an amino acid with chemical properties very similar to those of the one that would have been present had the error not occurred. This work has suggested that the second base of codons is less efficient in this respect, by about three orders of magnitude, than the first and third bases. These results are based on the assumption that all forms of error at all bases are equally likely. We extend this work to investigate (1) the effect of weighting transition errors differently from transversion errors and (2) the effect of weighting each base differently, depending on reported mistranslation biases. We find that if the bias affects all codon positions equally, as might be expected were the code adapted to a mutational environment with transition/transversion bias, then any reasonable transition/transversion bias increases the relative efficiency of the second base by an order of magnitude. In addition, if we employ weightings to allow for biases in translation, then only 1 in every million random alternative codes generated is more efficient than the natural code. We thus conclude not only that the natural genetic code is extremely efficient at minimizing the effects of errors, but also that its structure reflects biases in these errors, as might be expected were the code the product of selection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Genome Biol
                Genome Biology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1465-6906
                1465-6914
                2001
                24 October 2001
                : 2
                : 11
                : research0049.1-research0049.12
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biomolecular Engineering, Université Libre de Bruxelles, ave F D Roosevelt, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.
                [2 ]Ecole Polytechnique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, ave F D Roosevelt, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.
                [3 ]Service de Physique Théorique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Boulevard du Triomphe, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.
                Correspondence: Dimitri Gilis. E-mail: dgilis@ulb.ac.be
                Article
                gb-2001-2-11-research0049
                10.1186/gb-2001-2-11-research0049
                60310
                11737948
                e5c59b39-4ceb-461a-b080-627d43a1d83d
                Copyright © 2001 Gilis et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd
                History
                : 19 June 2001
                : 6 July 2001
                : 28 September 2001
                Categories
                Research

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article