1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Behavioural Deception and Formal Models of Communication

      The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The cost of honesty

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The evolution and psychology of self-deception.

            In this article we argue that self-deception evolved to facilitate interpersonal deception by allowing people to avoid the cues to conscious deception that might reveal deceptive intent. Self-deception has two additional advantages: It eliminates the costly cognitive load that is typically associated with deceiving, and it can minimize retribution if the deception is discovered. Beyond its role in specific acts of deception, self-deceptive self-enhancement also allows people to display more confidence than is warranted, which has a host of social advantages. The question then arises of how the self can be both deceiver and deceived. We propose that this is achieved through dissociations of mental processes, including conscious versus unconscious memories, conscious versus unconscious attitudes, and automatic versus controlled processes. Given the variety of methods for deceiving others, it should come as no surprise that self-deception manifests itself in a number of different psychological processes, and we discuss various types of self-deception. We then discuss the interpersonal versus intrapersonal nature of self-deception before considering the levels of consciousness at which the self can be deceived. Finally, we contrast our evolutionary approach to self-deception with current theories and debates in psychology and consider some of the costs associated with self-deception.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Honest signalling: the Philip Sidney game

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
                Br J Philos Sci
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0007-0882
                1464-3537
                August 18 2016
                September 18 2016
                : 67
                : 3
                : 757-780
                Article
                10.1093/bjps/axv001
                e5c87a06-916d-4d48-a623-00d8d49bee5d
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article