8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      [Cost efficacy analysis of thrombolytic strategies].

      Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux
      Cost-Benefit Analysis, Costs and Cost Analysis, Decision Trees, Fibrinolytic Agents, therapeutic use, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, drug therapy, Recurrence, Survival Rate, Thrombolytic Therapy, adverse effects, economics, methods

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Price disparities of thrombolytic agents and variability in complementary reperfusion therapies have a big impact on hospital costs of thrombolysis. Nine strategies combining 3 thrombolytic preparations (SK alone, SK + aspirin and rt-PA) and 3 strategies for the management of reocclusion are compared. Unit costs of cardiac catheterisation and surgery and direct cost of a hospital day were estimated from hospital accounts. The hypotheses concerning the frequency of interventions and length of stay were based on results in the literature and analysis of a series of 420 patients from 3 hospital centres. The average direct cost of hospitalisation per patient treated with streptokinase plus aspirin with a conservative approach was 22,500 FF. It increased by 15 p. 100 with delayed elective angioplasty and by 45 p. 100 with an aggressive reperfusion strategy. In a conservative protocol, hospital costs were 37 p. 100 higher when rt-PA was used instead of streptokinase. An rt-PA conservative management strategy was associated with a twenty times higher cost per additional survivor than that of streptokinase with aspirin.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article