5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predictors of suppurative complications for acute sore throat in primary care: prospective clinical cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective To document whether elements of a structured history and examination predict adverse outcome of acute sore throat.

          Design Prospective clinical cohort.

          Setting Primary care.

          Participants 14 610 adults with acute sore throat (≤2 weeks’ duration).

          Main outcome measures Common suppurative complications (quinsy or peritonsillar abscess, otitis media, sinusitis, impetigo or cellulitis) and reconsultation with new or unresolving symptoms within one month.

          Results Complications were assessed reliably (inter-rater κ=0.95). 1.3% (177/13 445) of participants developed complications overall and 14.2% (1889/13 288) reconsulted with new or unresolving symptoms. Independent predictors of complications were severe tonsillar inflammation (documented among 13.0% (1652/12 717); odds ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval 1.28 to 2.89) and severe earache (5% (667/13 323); 3.02, 1.91 to 4.76), but the model including both variables had modest prognostic utility (bootstrapped area under the receiver operator curve 0.61, 0.57 to 0.65), and 70% of complications (124/177) occurred when neither was present. Clinical prediction rules for bacterial infection (Centor criteria and FeverPAIN) also predicted complications, but predictive values were also poor and most complications occurred with low scores (67% (118/175) scoring ≤2 for Centor; 126/173 (73%) scoring ≤2 for FeverPAIN). Previous medical problems, sex, temperature, and muscle aches were independently but weakly associated with reconsultation with new or unresolving symptoms.

          Conclusion Important suppurative complications after an episode of acute sore throat in primary care are uncommon. History and examination and scores to predict bacterial infection cannot usefully identify those who will develop complications. Clinicians will need to rely on strategies such as safety netting or delayed prescription in managing the uncertainty and low risk of complications.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Role: general practitioner, professor primary care research
          Role: statistician
          Role: general practitioner, professor primary care
          Role: general practitioner, professor primary care
          Role: general practitioner, professor primary care research
          Role: general practitioner, professor primary care
          Role: general practitioner, professor of primary care
          Role: senior study manager
          Role: senior study manager
          Role: director, South East Wales Trial Unit
          Role: clinical lecturer
          Role: statistician
          Role: general practitioner, senior lecturer in primary care
          Role: professor of general practice
          Role: general practitioner, reader in primary care
          Journal
          BMJ
          BMJ
          bmj
          BMJ : British Medical Journal
          BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
          0959-8138
          1756-1833
          2013
          2013
          25 November 2013
          : 347
          : f6867
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Primary Care and Population Sciences Division, University of Southampton, UK
          [2 ]Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
          [3 ]Wales School of Primary Care Research, Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
          [4 ]Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
          [5 ]University of Exeter Medical School. Exeter, UK
          [6 ]Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
          Author notes
          Correspondence to: P Little University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor close, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK p.little@ 123456soton.ac.uk
          Article
          litp013637
          10.1136/bmj.f6867
          3898431
          24277339
          e61855bc-21de-48a4-967a-d03c2039a0c6
          © Little et al 2013

          This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.

          History
          : 4 November 2013
          Categories
          Research

          Medicine
          Medicine

          Comments

          Comment on this article