33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Meta-Analysis on Antecedents and Outcomes of Detachment from Work

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Detachment from work has been proposed as an important non-work experience helping employees to recover from work demands. This meta-analysis (86 publications, k = 91 independent study samples, N = 38,124 employees) examined core antecedents and outcomes of detachment in employee samples. With regard to outcomes, results indicated average positive correlations between detachment and self-reported mental (i.e., less exhaustion, higher life satisfaction, more well-being, better sleep) and physical (i.e., lower physical discomfort) health, state well-being (i.e., less fatigue, higher positive affect, more intensive state of recovery), and task performance (small to medium sized effects). However, average relationships between detachment and physiological stress indicators and work motivation were not significant while associations with contextual performance and creativity were significant, but negative. Concerning work characteristics, as expected, job demands were negatively related and job resources were positively related to detachment (small sized effects). Further, analyses revealed that person characteristics such as negative affectivity/neuroticism (small sized effect) and heavy work investment (medium sized effect) were negatively related to detachment whereas detachment and demographic variables (i.e., age and gender) were not related. Moreover, we found a medium sized average negative relationship between engagement in work-related activities during non-work time and detachment. For most of the examined relationships heterogeneity of effect sizes was moderate to high. We identified study design, samples' gender distribution, and affective valence of work-related thoughts as moderators for some of these aforementioned relationships. The results of this meta-analysis point to detachment as a non-work (recovery) experience that is influenced by work-related and personal characteristics which in turn is relevant for a range of employee outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references89

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A META-ANALYTIC TEST OF THE CHALLENGE STRESSOR--HINDRANCE STRESSOR FRAMEWORK: AN EXPLANATION FOR INCONSISTENT RELATIONSHIPS AMONG STRESSORS AND PERFORMANCE.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes.

            In this article, we develop and meta-analytically test the relationship between job demands and resources and burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes in the workplace. In a meta-analysis of 203 independent samples (N = 186,440), we found support for a health impairment process and for a motivational process as mechanisms through which job demands and resources relate to safety outcomes. In particular, we found that job demands such as risks and hazards and complexity impair employees' health and positively relate to burnout. Likewise, we found support for job resources such as knowledge, autonomy, and a supportive environment motivating employees and positively relating to engagement. Job demands were found to hinder an employee with a negative relationship to engagement, whereas job resources were found to negatively relate to burnout. Finally, we found that burnout was negatively related to working safely but that engagement motivated employees and was positively related to working safely. Across industries, risks and hazards was the most consistent job demand and a supportive environment was the most consistent job resource in terms of explaining variance in burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. The type of job demand that explained the most variance differed by industry, whereas a supportive environment remained consistent in explaining the most variance in all industries.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Sex Differences in Coping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and an Examination of Relative Coping

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                13 January 2017
                2016
                : 7
                : 2072
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Regional Transfer/Special Sectors Dresden, Germany
                [2] 2Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Mental Workload Berlin, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Renato Pisanti, University Niccolò Cusano, Italy

                Reviewed by: Ioana Alina Cristea, Babeş-Bolyai University, Italy; Anita Dunkl, University of Graz, Austria

                *Correspondence: Johannes Wendsche wendsche.johannes@ 123456baua.bund.de

                This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02072
                5233687
                28133454
                e6729efd-c159-43ce-a971-42d2f779e5ff
                Copyright © 2017 Wendsche and Lohmann-Haislah.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 02 August 2016
                : 22 December 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 160, Pages: 24, Words: 19445
                Funding
                Funded by: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin 10.13039/501100006522
                Award ID: F 2353
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                detachment,meta-analysis,recovery,rumination,stress,work reflection
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                detachment, meta-analysis, recovery, rumination, stress, work reflection

                Comments

                Comment on this article