11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The detection accuracy of cone beam CT for osseous defects of the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article
      1 , 1 , a , 1
      Scientific Reports
      Nature Publishing Group

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this review was to evaluate whether cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is reliable for the detection of bone changes of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Studies collected from the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Embase, Wanfang and CNKI databases were searched, and the publishing time was limited from January 1990 to December 2015. Eight studies (23 experimental research groups) were eventually included for further analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 0.67 and the pooled specificity was 0.87, which leads to a relatively large area (0.84) under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. The related pooled positive likelihood ratio (+LR) and the pooled negative likelihood ratio (−LR) were 5.2 and 0.38, respectively. The subgroup analysis was conducted for four subgroups categorized by voxel size (≤0.2; >0.2, ≤0.3; >0.3, ≤0.4; >0.4, and ≤0.5 (mm)), and the “>0.4, ≤0.5” subgroup had a higher pooled sensitivity and pooled specificity than the other groups. The present study demonstrates that CBCT has a relatively high diagnostic accuracy for TMJ bone changes, although its reliability is limited. Voxel size did not play a role in the accuracy of CBCT.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography.

          Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is increasingly being used as an imaging modality, particularly in the assessment of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). A blinded observational cross-sectional in-vitro study was conducted to compare the diagnostic accuracy of observers viewing images made with CBCT, panoramic radiography, and linear tomography. The task was to detect cortical erosions affecting the mandibular condylar head. The sample consisted of 37 TMJ articulations from 30 skulls with either normal condylar morphology (n = 19) or erosion of the lateral pole (n = 18). The articulations were imaged by using corrected angle linear tomography (TOMO), normal (Pan-N) and TMJ-specific (Pan-TM) panoramic radiography, and CBCT. Digital images were obtained with photostimulable phosphor plates for all modalities except CBCT. The CBCT detector used an amorphous silicon flat-panel array combined with cesium iodide. Images and 10 rereads were presented to 10 observers on a flat-panel display at a pixel-to-monitor ratio of 1:1. CBCT multi-planar images were presented both statically (CBCT-S) and interactively (CBCT-I). The observers were permitted to scroll through axial (0.4 mm) and para-sagittal (1 mm) sections and then independently rate their confidence about the presence or absence of cortical erosion. Intraobserver reliability was determined by weighted kappa and diagnostic accuracy by the fitted area under the ROC curve. Means were compared by using ANOVA (P < or =.05). Intraobserver reliability was moderate (0.57 +/- 0.22; range, 0.34-0.78). Pan-N (0.72 +/- 0.15), CBCT-I (0.65 +/- 0.21), and CBCT-S (0.65 +/- 0.17) reliability was significantly greater than TOMO (0.44 +/- 0.25). The diagnostic accuracy of CBCT-I (0.95 +/- 0.05) and CBCT-S (0.77 +/- 0.17) was significantly greater than all other modalities (Pan-N [0.64 +/- 0.11], Pan-TM [0.55 +/- 0.11], TOMO [0.58 +/- 0.15]). CBCT-I was also more accurate than CBCT-S, and Pan-N was more accurate than Pan-TM and TOMO. CBCT images provide superior reliability and greater accuracy than TOMO and TMJ panoramic projections in the detection of condylar cortical erosion.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Application of cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the temporomandibular joints.

            Radiographic examination is essential for the diagnosis and management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. The goals of TMJ radiography are to evaluate cortical and trabecular architecture of the bony structures and confirm their integrity, to assess the extent and monitor progression of osseous changes, and to evaluate the response to treatment. Accurate evaluation of the TMJ by conventional radiography is limited by structure superimposition. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides high-resolution multiplanar images and delivers substantially lower radiation dose, compared with multislice CT. CBCT allows examination of TMJ anatomy without superimposition and distortion to facilitate analysis of bone morphology, joint space and dynamic function in all three dimensions. This article will describe the role of CBCT imaging for the assessment of the TMJ osseous structures and present typical appearances of common pathological conditions of the TMJ. © 2012 Australian Dental Association.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Role of different imaging modalities in assessment of temporomandibular joint erosions and osteophytes: a systematic review.

              To evaluate the ability of different diagnostic imaging techniques for diagnosing the presence of erosions and osteophytes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). A systematic search of PubMed, Medline, all Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) reviews, Embase, Web of Sciences and Lilacs identified nine articles that met the selection criteria: some type of TMJ diagnostic imaging, data from autopsy or dry skull TMJs as gold standard, absence of diagnosed systemic arthritis and evaluation of the presence of erosions and/or osteophytes. A hand search of the references of the selected articles was also performed. Selected studies evaluated panoramic imaging (unenhanced and colour-enhanced digital subtraction panoramic imaging), axially corrected sagittal tomography, axially corrected frontal tomography, sagittal MRI, CT, high-resolution ultrasound and cone beam CT (CBCT). Axially corrected sagittal tomography is currently the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing erosions and osteophytes in the TMJ. CT does not seem to add any significant information to what is obtained from axially corrected sagittal tomography. CBCT might prove to be a cost- and radiation dose-effective alternative to axially corrected sagittal tomography. Combining different radiographic techniques is likely to be more accurate in diagnosing erosions and osteophytes in the TMJ than using a single imaging modality. Diagnostic studies that simultaneously evaluate all of the available TMJ imaging technologies are needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group
                2045-2322
                06 October 2016
                2016
                : 6
                : 34714
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology , Beijing, China
                Author notes
                Article
                srep34714
                10.1038/srep34714
                5052594
                27708375
                e672e296-f85e-40e3-9220-fbcabd1856e3
                Copyright © 2016, The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 18 May 2016
                : 19 September 2016
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article