6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Maternal RhD heterozygous genotype is associated with male biased secondary sex ratio

      Preprint
      , , ,
      bioRxiv

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The results of previous studies overwhelmingly suggest that RhD positive heterozygotes express better health status than Rh positive homozygous, especially in RhD negative subjects. This also applies to pregnant women. According to the Trivers-Willard hypothesis, women in better physical condition should have a male-skewed sex ratio. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that RhD positive heterozygous mothers give birth to more sons than daughters. In the present cross-sectional study, we analysed data from 5,655 women who have given birth in the General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic between 2008-2012. Clinical records comprised maternal weight before pregnancy, number of previous deliveries, sex of the newborn, maternal RhD phenotype, and RhD phenotype of the newborn. Secondary sex ratio was significantly higher (P=0.028) in RhD positive mothers who had RhD negative newborns, i.e. in heterozygotes (SR=1.23), than in RhD positive mothers who had RhD positive newborns, i.e. in a mixed population of heterozygotes and homozygotes (SR=1.00), especially in primiparous women (P=0.013; SR=1.37 and 0.99 resp.). In line with the Trivers-Willard effect, RhD maternal heterozygous genotype is associated with male biased secondary sex ratio. The results supported the hypothesis that RhD polymorphism may be maintained due to heterozygote health advantages.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          bioRxiv
          February 08 2019
          Article
          10.1101/543629
          e6779bdc-87ce-4207-8145-ccf539c3e44f
          © 2019
          History

          Evolutionary Biology,Forensic science
          Evolutionary Biology, Forensic science

          Comments

          Comment on this article