0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Latent Classes of Nicotine Beliefs Correlate with Perceived Susceptibility and Severity of Nicotine and Tobacco Products in US young adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Pervasive misperceptions about nicotine may influence uptake of quit smoking aids and the impact of policies addressing nicotine as a tobacco product constituent.

          Methods

          Latent class analyses were conducted using four items on nicotine beliefs asked of 4037 adults aged 18–40 in wave 9 (February–March 2016) of the Truth Initiative Young Adult Cohort Study. Confirmatory factor analyses identified three factors from 12 items: nicotine susceptibility (NSUS), nicotine severity (NSEV), and tobacco severity (TSEV). Analyses assessed correlations between latent classes, sociodemographics, and nicotine/tobacco factor scores.

          Results

          A four-class model of nicotine beliefs was the best fit, with the largest class believing that nicotine plays a major part in smoking risks (class 1, n = 2070; 52%). Class 2 shared that belief but also responded “Don’t know” to addiction questions (class 2, n = 382; 11%). Fewer belonged in class 3, who reported that nicotine plays a small part in health risks ( n = 1277; 30%), and class 4, who perceived nicotine as not cancer causing ( n = 308; 7%). Latent class membership was correlated with sociodemographics, peer smoking, and past 30-day tobacco use. Classes 1 and 2 had similar NSUS scores and classes 3 and 4 had similar NSEV and TSEV scores.

          Discussion

          Differences in the perceptions of nicotine and tobacco-related harms can be partially explained by clustering of underlying nicotine beliefs. These classes of beliefs are correlated with sociodemographic predictors of smoking. These findings may help to identify specific beliefs or groups to be targeted by public education efforts on nicotine.

          Implications

          The current study supports that underlying nicotine beliefs are associated with perceived harms of specific nicotine and tobacco products (relative to cigarettes), with greater false beliefs about nicotine correlated with greater perceived susceptibility to nicotine addiction. Two important inferences emerge from this study: first, that education to address nicotine beliefs may also reframe perceptions of the harms of nicotine and tobacco products; and second, that this type of education may differentially impact perceptions of the harms of nicotine products (e.g., nicotine replacement therapy and e-cigarettes) and tobacco products (e.g., cigars, smokeless, and hookah).

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Harm Minimization and Tobacco Control: Reframing Societal Views of Nicotine Use to Rapidly Save Lives

          Inhalation of the toxic smoke produced by combusting tobacco products, primarily cigarettes, is the overwhelming cause of tobacco-related disease and death in the United States and globally. A diverse class of alternative nicotine delivery systems (ANDS) has recently been developed that do not combust tobacco and are substantially less harmful than cigarettes. ANDS have the potential to disrupt the 120-year dominance of the cigarette and challenge the field on how the tobacco pandemic could be reversed if nicotine is decoupled from lethal inhaled smoke. ANDS may provide a means to compete with, and even replace, combusted cigarette use, saving more lives more rapidly than previously possible. On the basis of the scientific evidence on ANDS, we explore benefits and harms to public health to guide practice, policy, and regulation. A reframing of societal nicotine use through the lens of harm minimization is an extraordinary opportunity to enhance the impact of tobacco control efforts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Perceived harm, addictiveness, and social acceptability of tobacco products and marijuana among young adults: marijuana, hookah, and electronic cigarettes win.

            There has been an increase in non-daily smoking, alternative tobacco product and marijuana use among young adults in recent years.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              E-cigarette awareness and perceived harmfulness: prevalence and associations with smoking-cessation outcomes.

              Electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes, are increasingly advertised as replacements for regular cigarettes or cessation aids for smokers. To describe the prevalence and correlates of e-cigarette awareness and perceived harmfulness among U.S. adults and analyze whether these variables are associated with smokers' past-year quit attempts and intention to quit. Data were obtained from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 4 Cycle 2), conducted from October 2012 to January 2013. Data analyses were performed from June to August 2013. Overall, 77% of respondents were aware of e-cigarettes. Of these, 51% believed e-cigarettes were less harmful than cigarettes. Younger, white (compared with Hispanic), more educated respondents and current or former smokers (compared with non-smokers) were more likely to be aware of e-cigarettes. Among those who were aware of e-cigarettes, younger, more educated respondents and current smokers (compared with former and non-smokers) were more likely to believe that e-cigarettes were less harmful. Awareness and perceived harm were not associated with smokers' past year quit attempts or intention to quit. Overall e-cigarette awareness increased whereas the proportion of smokers who perceived less harm of e-cigarettes declined compared with earlier surveys. However, awareness and perceived harm of e-cigarettes did not show evidence of promoting smoking cessation at the population level. Copyright © 2014 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nicotine Tob Res
                Nicotine Tob. Res
                nictob
                Nicotine & Tobacco Research
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1462-2203
                1469-994X
                December 2019
                23 December 2019
                23 December 2019
                : 21
                : Suppl 1 , Standards to Reduce Nicotine in Combusted Tobacco in the United States
                : S91-S100
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont , Burlington, VT
                [2 ] Department of Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont , Burlington, VT
                [3 ] Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences/Health Administration and Policy, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno , Reno, NV
                [4 ] Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers School of Public Health, State University of New Jersey , New Brunswick, NJ
                [5 ] Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative , Washington, DC
                [6 ] Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Global Public Health, New York University , New York, NY
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Andrea C. Villanti, PhD, MPH, Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect Street, MS 482, Burlington, VT 05401, USA; Telephone: 802 656 1187; Fax: 802 656 9628; E-mail: avillant@ 123456uvm.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3104-966X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1400-5932
                Article
                ntz156
                10.1093/ntr/ntz156
                6939776
                31867640
                e6831991-7ace-4249-a15c-5093d63898f0
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 11 May 2019
                : 21 August 2019
                : 17 August 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute 10.13039/100000054
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: R03CA212694
                Categories
                Perceptions and Communications

                Agriculture
                Agriculture

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content51

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors344