9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Soluble CD146, an innovative and non-invasive biomarker of embryo selection for in vitro fertilization

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although progress was made in in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques, the majority of embryos transferred fail to implant. Morphology embryo scoring is the standard procedure for most of IVF centres for choosing the best embryo, but remains limited since even the embryos classified as “top quality” may not implant. As it has been shown that i) CD146 is involved in embryo implantation and ii) membrane form is shed to generate soluble CD146 (sCD146), we propose that sCD146 in embryo supernatants may constitute a new biomarker of embryo selection. Immunocytochemical staining showed expression of CD146 in early embryo stages and sCD146 was detected by ELISA and Western-blot in embryo supernatants from D2. We retrospectively studied 126 couples who underwent IVF attempt. The embryo culture medium from each transferred embryo (n = 222) was collected for measurement of sCD146 by ELISA. Significantly higher sCD146 concentrations were present in embryo supernatants that did not implant (n = 185) as compared to those that successfully implanted (n = 37) (1310 +/- 1152 pg.mL -1 vs. 845+/- 1173 pg.mL -1, p = 0.024). Sensitivity analysis performed on single embryo transfers (n = 71) confirmed this association (p = 0.0054). The computed ROC curve established that the optimal sCD146 concentration for embryo implantation is under 1164 pg.mL -1 (sensitivity: 76%, specificity: 48%, PPV: 25% and NPV: 92%). Over this sCD146 threshold, the implantation rate was significantly lower (9% with sCD146 levels >1164 pg.ml -1 vs. 22% with sCD146 levels ≤ 1164 pg.mL -1, p = 0.01). Among the embryos preselected by morphologic scoring, sCD146 determination could allow a better selection of the embryo(s), thus improving the success of elective single embryo transfer. This study establishes the proof of concept for the use of sCD146 as a biomarker for IVF by excluding the embryo with the highest sCD146 level. A multicentre prospective study will now be necessary to further establish its use in clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting.

          Many variations in oocyte and embryo grading make inter-laboratory comparisons extremely difficult. This paper reports the proceedings of an international consensus meeting on oocyte and embryo morphology assessment. Background presentations about current practice were given. The expert panel developed a set of consensus points to define the minimum criteria for oocyte and embryo morphology assessment. It is expected that the definition of common terminology and standardization of laboratory practice related to embryo morphology assessment will result in more effective comparisons of treatment outcomes. This document is intended to be referenced as a global consensus to allow standardized reporting of the minimum data set required for the accurate description of embryo development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development.

            The earliest stages of development in most animals, including the few mammalian species that have been investigated, are regulated by maternally inherited information. Dependence on expression of the embryonic genome cannot be detected until the mid two-cell stage in the mouse, the four-cell stage in the pig (J. Osborn & C. Polge, personal communication), and the eight-cell stage in the sheep. Information about the timing of activation of the embryonic genome in the human is of relevance not only to the therapeutic practice of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF), but more importantly for the successful development of techniques for the preimplantation diagnosis of certain inherited genetic diseases. We describe here changes in the pattern of polypeptides synthesized during the pre-implantation stages of human development, and demonstrate that some of the major qualitative changes which occur between the four- and eight-cell stages are dependent on transcription. In addition, it appears that cleavage is not sensitive to transcriptional inhibition until after the four-cell stage.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial.

              To determine whether blastocyst biopsy and rapid quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) improves in vitro fertilization (IVF) implantation and delivery rates. Randomized controlled trial. Academic reproductive medicine center. Infertile couples in whom the female partner (or oocyte donor) is between the ages of 21 and 42 years who are attempting conception through IVF. Embryonic aneuploidy screening. Sustained implantation and delivery rates. We transferred 134 blastocysts to 72 patients in the study (CCS) group and 163 blastocysts to 83 patients in the routine care (control) group. Sustained implantation rates (probability that an embryo will implant and progress to delivery) were statistically significantly higher in the CCS group (89 of 134; 66.4%) compared with those from the control group (78 of 163; 47.9%). Delivery rates per cycle were also statistically significantly higher in the CCS group. Sixty one of 72 treatment cycles using CCS led to delivery (84.7%), and 56 of 83 (67.5%) control cycles ultimately delivered. Outcomes were excellent in both groups, but use of CCS clearly improved patient outcomes. Blastocyst biopsy with rapid qPCR-based comprehensive chromosomal screening results in statistically significantly improved IVF outcomes, as evidenced by meaningful increases in sustained implantation and delivery rates. NCT01219283. Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                14 March 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 3
                : e0173724
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm U1076, Marseille, France
                [2 ]Assisted Reproductive Center, Laboratory of Reproduction, CHU La Conception, AP-HM, Marseille and Laboratory of Histology-Embryology/Biology of Reproduction, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
                [3 ]PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, Montpellier, France
                [4 ]Immunology Laboratory, Pole de Biologie, CHU Conception Marseille, AP-HM, Marseille, France
                Peking University Third Hospital, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: NB OPL.

                • Formal analysis: NM.

                • Investigation: SB OPL NM AB MP AL FDG MBC NB.

                • Resources: OPL MP.

                • Supervision: NB MBC.

                • Validation: SB OPL NM AB MP AL FDG MBC NB.

                • Visualization: SR.

                • Writing – original draft: SB OPL NM AB MP AL FDG MBC NB.

                • Writing – review & editing: SB OPL NM AB MP AL FDG MBC NB.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9870-9098
                Article
                PONE-D-16-36280
                10.1371/journal.pone.0173724
                5349662
                28291830
                e68de677-d9f7-4436-b861-c596ee820d96
                © 2017 Bouvier et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 9 September 2016
                : 24 February 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Pages: 14
                Funding
                This work was supported by a grant from the Agence de la Biomedecine. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Embryology
                Embryos
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Pregnancy
                Embryo Transfer
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Pregnancy
                Embryo Transfer
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Pregnancy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Pregnancy
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Biomarkers
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Embryology
                Blastocysts
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Immunologic Techniques
                Immunoassays
                Enzyme-Linked Immunoassays
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Biological Cultures
                Culture Media
                Engineering and Technology
                Equipment
                Laboratory Equipment
                Culture Media
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Types
                Animal Cells
                Germ Cells
                OVA
                Oocytes
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article