19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Early administration of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir could prevent severe COVID-19

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          No specific treatment against SARS-CoV-2 is available after 6 months of COVID-19 worldwide outbreak

          Antivirals could decrease the viral load and reduce direct and indirect damages of SARSCoV-2 infection

          Ritonavir-bosted lopinavir is effective against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro

          Sequential virological and pharmacological monitoring helped to understand the efficacy of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in a SARS-CoV-2 infected patient

          Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir could be proposed as early treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A Trial of Lopinavir–Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19

          Abstract Background No therapeutics have yet been proven effective for the treatment of severe illness caused by SARS-CoV-2. Methods We conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label trial involving hospitalized adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, which causes the respiratory illness Covid-19, and an oxygen saturation (Sao 2) of 94% or less while they were breathing ambient air or a ratio of the partial pressure of oxygen (Pao 2) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio 2) of less than 300 mm Hg. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lopinavir–ritonavir (400 mg and 100 mg, respectively) twice a day for 14 days, in addition to standard care, or standard care alone. The primary end point was the time to clinical improvement, defined as the time from randomization to either an improvement of two points on a seven-category ordinal scale or discharge from the hospital, whichever came first. Results A total of 199 patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent randomization; 99 were assigned to the lopinavir–ritonavir group, and 100 to the standard-care group. Treatment with lopinavir–ritonavir was not associated with a difference from standard care in the time to clinical improvement (hazard ratio for clinical improvement, 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.72). Mortality at 28 days was similar in the lopinavir–ritonavir group and the standard-care group (19.2% vs. 25.0%; difference, −5.8 percentage points; 95% CI, −17.3 to 5.7). The percentages of patients with detectable viral RNA at various time points were similar. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, lopinavir–ritonavir led to a median time to clinical improvement that was shorter by 1 day than that observed with standard care (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.91). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the lopinavir–ritonavir group, but serious adverse events were more common in the standard-care group. Lopinavir–ritonavir treatment was stopped early in 13 patients (13.8%) because of adverse events. Conclusions In hospitalized adult patients with severe Covid-19, no benefit was observed with lopinavir–ritonavir treatment beyond standard care. Future trials in patients with severe illness may help to confirm or exclude the possibility of a treatment benefit. (Funded by Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development and others; Chinese Clinical Trial Register number, ChiCTR2000029308.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted

            The latest threat to global health is the ongoing outbreak of the respiratory disease that was recently given the name Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19). Covid-19 was recognized in December 2019. 1 It was rapidly shown to be caused by a novel coronavirus that is structurally related to the virus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). As in two preceding instances of emergence of coronavirus disease in the past 18 years 2 — SARS (2002 and 2003) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) (2012 to the present) — the Covid-19 outbreak has posed critical challenges for the public health, research, and medical communities. In their Journal article, Li and colleagues 3 provide a detailed clinical and epidemiologic description of the first 425 cases reported in the epicenter of the outbreak: the city of Wuhan in Hubei province, China. Although this information is critical in informing the appropriate response to this outbreak, as the authors point out, the study faces the limitation associated with reporting in real time the evolution of an emerging pathogen in its earliest stages. Nonetheless, a degree of clarity is emerging from this report. The median age of the patients was 59 years, with higher morbidity and mortality among the elderly and among those with coexisting conditions (similar to the situation with influenza); 56% of the patients were male. Of note, there were no cases in children younger than 15 years of age. Either children are less likely to become infected, which would have important epidemiologic implications, or their symptoms were so mild that their infection escaped detection, which has implications for the size of the denominator of total community infections. On the basis of a case definition requiring a diagnosis of pneumonia, the currently reported case fatality rate is approximately 2%. 4 In another article in the Journal, Guan et al. 5 report mortality of 1.4% among 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19; these patients had a wide spectrum of disease severity. If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively. 2 The efficiency of transmission for any respiratory virus has important implications for containment and mitigation strategies. The current study indicates an estimated basic reproduction number (R0) of 2.2, which means that, on average, each infected person spreads the infection to an additional two persons. As the authors note, until this number falls below 1.0, it is likely that the outbreak will continue to spread. Recent reports of high titers of virus in the oropharynx early in the course of disease arouse concern about increased infectivity during the period of minimal symptoms. 6,7 China, the United States, and several other countries have instituted temporary restrictions on travel with an eye toward slowing the spread of this new disease within China and throughout the rest of the world. The United States has seen a dramatic reduction in the number of travelers from China, especially from Hubei province. At least on a temporary basis, such restrictions may have helped slow the spread of the virus: whereas 78,191 laboratory-confirmed cases had been identified in China as of February 26, 2020, a total of 2918 cases had been confirmed in 37 other countries or territories. 4 As of February 26, 2020, there had been 14 cases detected in the United States involving travel to China or close contacts with travelers, 3 cases among U.S. citizens repatriated from China, and 42 cases among U.S. passengers repatriated from a cruise ship where the infection had spread. 8 However, given the efficiency of transmission as indicated in the current report, we should be prepared for Covid-19 to gain a foothold throughout the world, including in the United States. Community spread in the United States could require a shift from containment to mitigation strategies such as social distancing in order to reduce transmission. Such strategies could include isolating ill persons (including voluntary isolation at home), school closures, and telecommuting where possible. 9 A robust research effort is currently under way to develop a vaccine against Covid-19. 10 We anticipate that the first candidates will enter phase 1 trials by early spring. Therapy currently consists of supportive care while a variety of investigational approaches are being explored. 11 Among these are the antiviral medication lopinavir–ritonavir, interferon-1β, the RNA polymerase inhibitor remdesivir, chloroquine, and a variety of traditional Chinese medicine products. 11 Once available, intravenous hyperimmune globulin from recovered persons and monoclonal antibodies may be attractive candidates to study in early intervention. Critical to moving the field forward, even in the context of an outbreak, is ensuring that investigational products are evaluated in scientifically and ethically sound studies. 12 Every outbreak provides an opportunity to gain important information, some of which is associated with a limited window of opportunity. For example, Li et al. report a mean interval of 9.1 to 12.5 days between the onset of illness and hospitalization. This finding of a delay in the progression to serious disease may be telling us something important about the pathogenesis of this new virus and may provide a unique window of opportunity for intervention. Achieving a better understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease will be invaluable in navigating our responses in this uncharted arena. Furthermore, genomic studies could delineate host factors that predispose persons to acquisition of infection and disease progression. The Covid-19 outbreak is a stark reminder of the ongoing challenge of emerging and reemerging infectious pathogens and the need for constant surveillance, prompt diagnosis, and robust research to understand the basic biology of new organisms and our susceptibilities to them, as well as to develop effective countermeasures.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Drug targets for corona virus: A systematic review

              The 2019-novel coronavirus (nCoV) is a major source of disaster in the 21th century. However, the lack of specific drugs to prevent/treat an attack is a major need at this current point of time. In this regard, we conducted a systematic review to identify major druggable targets in coronavirus (CoV). We searched PubMed and RCSB database with keywords HCoV, NCoV, corona virus, SERS-CoV, MERS-CoV, 2019-nCoV, crystal structure, X-ray crystallography structure, NMR structure, target, and drug target till Feb 3, 2020. The search identified seven major targets (spike protein, envelop protein, membrane protein, protease, nucleocapsid protein, hemagglutinin esterase, and helicase) for which drug design can be considered. There are other 16 nonstructural proteins (NSPs), which can also be considered from the drug design perspective. The major structural proteins and NSPs may serve an important role from drug design perspectives. However, the occurrence of frequent recombination events is a major deterrent factor toward the development of CoV-specific vaccines/drugs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Infect
                J. Infect
                The Journal of Infection
                The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                0163-4453
                1532-2742
                27 May 2020
                27 May 2020
                Affiliations
                [a ] Sorbonne Université, INSERM 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique , and Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Paris , France
                [b ] Sorbonne Université, INSERM 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique , and Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Virologie, Paris , France
                [c ] Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Laboratoire de Pharmacologie-Toxicologie , DMU Biologie et Génomique Médicale (BioGeM), IAME INSERM UMR-S 1137, Paris , France
                [d ] Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Virologie, Paris , France
                [e ] Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Laboratoire de Pharmacologie-Toxicologie , DMU Biologie et Génomique Médicale (BioGeM), INSERM UMR-S 1144, Paris , France
                [f ] Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Paris , France
                [g ] Sorbonne Université, INSERM 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique , and Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Virologie, Paris , France
                [h ] Sorbonne Université, INSERM 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique , and Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Virologie, Paris , France
                [i ] Sorbonne Université, INSERM 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique , and Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Paris , France
                [j ] Sorbonne Université, INSERM 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique , and Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Paris , France
                [k ]Sorbonne Université, INSERM 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, and Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Virologie, Paris, France
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: Elise Klement-Frutos, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, 47-83 Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France, Phone +33 1 42 16 03 97 elisemarie.klement@ 123456aphp.fr
                [1]

                Both authors contributed equally to the present work.

                Article
                S0163-4453(20)30318-2
                10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.039
                7251410
                e6bf8bf0-03ba-4574-9ead-fe0e5667f6ef
                © 2020 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 20 May 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                sars-cov-2,covid-19,lopinavir,protease inhibitor,virology,pharmacology

                Comments

                Comment on this article