8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Innovative doctors in Germany changes through communities of practice

      case-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The healthcare sector faces new financial and managerial accountability demands, along with their clinical accountability. Various studies show strong opposition by clinicians to new accountability tools, new structures and new ways of working. Less attention is paid to the innovative roles doctors can play in leading changes that use new managerial tools and techniques. The purpose of this paper is to analyse two original case studies illustrating how general practitioners GPs in Germany have led radical change.

          Designmethodologyapproach

          The paper draws upon original research in Germany to present two case studies using a qualitative method, which are analysed using Glaser and Strauss' conventions of grounded theory, structured by Wenger's communities of practice framework, supporting a comprehensive literature review.

          Findings

          GPs are found to be able to lead radical change in healthcare delivery models and organisation using entrepreneurial talents developed in their practice businesses and to embrace modernising tools and techniques and in the process redefine their identities to include management process in addition to medical competences.

          Originalityvalue

          The paper presents two original case studies of radical change leading to an integration of healthcare services in Germany. The approach adopted by the German GPs reveals important general lessons for practitioners, as does the analytical framework employed in the paper.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A hybrid profession—the acquisition of management accounting expertise by medical professionals

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            One hundred and eighteen years of the German health insurance system: are there any lessons for middle- and low-income countries?

            A number of low and middle income countries (LMICs) are considering social health insurance (SHI) for adoption into their social and economic environment or striving to sustain and improve already existing SHI schemes. SHI was first introduced in Germany in 1883. An analysis of the German system from its inception up to today may yield lessons relevant to other countries. Such an analysis, however, is largely lacking, especially with regard to LMICs. This paper attempts to fill this gap. For each of the following lessons, it considers if and under which conditions they may be of relevance to LMICs. First, small, informal, voluntary health insurance schemes may serve as learning models for fund administration and solidarity, but in order to achieve universal coverage government action is needed to formalise these schemes and to introduce a principle of compulsion. Once compulsory health insurance exists for some people, incremental expansion of coverage to other regions and social groups may be feasible to achieve universality. Second, in order to ensure sustainability of SHI, the mandated benefit package should be adapted incrementally in accordance with changing needs, values and economic circumstances. Third. in a pluralistic SHI system equity, as well as risk pooling and spreading, can be enhanced if funds merge. The optimal number of funds, however, will depend on the stage of development of the SHI system as well as on other objectives of the system, including choice and competition. A risk equalisation scheme may prevent the adverse effects of risk selection, if competition between insurance funds is introduced into the system. Fourth, as an alternative to both state and market regulation, self-governance may serve as a source of stability and sustainability as well as a means of decentralising and democratising a health care system. Finally, costs can be successfully contained in a fee-for-service system, if cost-escalating provider behaviour is constrained by either political pressure or technical means.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Colonizing the new world of NHS management: the shifting power of professionals.

              This paper explores the changing patterns of professional power and the struggle for control between doctors and managers in the UK NHS, by examining the role of clinical directors. Located at the nexus of managerial and professional power, clinical directors represent and embody the challenges to medicine through increased managerialism and the profession's response to it. An analysis of the role of clinical directors reveals the changes in power and jurisdiction that have been created through clinical management. A medical model of professional power illustrates how structural and ideological changes threaten medical dominance. However, clinical directors respond to the changes by creating new forms of expertise through managerial assimilation, to extend their jurisdiction and domain within the organization and in the market. This re-professionalization, rather than de-professionalization, by doctors raises questions about the shifting power balance between doctors and managers in the NHS and between doctors within the medical profession.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                jhom
                10.1108/jhom
                Journal of Health Organization and Management
                Emerald Publishing
                1477-7266
                05 September 2008
                : 22
                : 5
                : 465-479
                Affiliations
                The Business School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
                Article
                0250220503.pdf 0250220503
                10.1108/14777260810898697
                18959299
                e6c9f1dd-da21-4478-abf3-df3589291add
                © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
                History
                Categories
                case-report, Case study
                cat-HSC, Health & social care
                cat-HMAN, Healthcare management
                Custom metadata
                no
                yes
                included

                Health & Social care
                General practitioners,Organizational structures,Health services,Germany,Outpatients

                Comments

                Comment on this article