3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Escherichia coli strains colonising the gastrointestinal tract protect germfree mice against Salmonella typhimurium infection.

      Gut

      pathogenicity, Salmonella typhimurium, immunology, Salmonella Infections, methods, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Mice, Inbred C3H, Mice, Humans, analysis, Hemolysin Proteins, Germ-Free Life, Female, Escherichia coli Proteins, Escherichia coli Infections, Cytotoxins, Cells, Cultured, Caco-2 Cells, Bacterial Toxins, physiology, Antibiosis, Animals, Analysis of Variance

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Escherichia coli is part of the normal gastrointestinal microflora which exerts a barrier effect against enteropathogens. Several E coli strains develop a protective effect against other Enterobacteriaceae. Two E coli strains, EM0, a human faecal strain, and JM105 K-12 were tested for their ability to prevent in vivo and in vitro infection by Salmonella typhimurium C5. Inhibition of C5 cell invasion by E coli was investigated in vitro using Caco-2/TC7 cells. The protective effect of E coli was examined in vivo in germfree or conventional C3H/He/Oujco mice orally infected by the lethal strain C5. EMO expresses haemolysin and cytotoxic necrotising factor in vitro. In vitro, the two strains did not prevent the growth of C5 by secreted microcins or modified cell invasion of C5. In vivo, establishment of EM0 or JM105 in the gut of germfree mice resulted in a significant increase in the number of surviving mice: 11/12 and 9/12, respectively, at 58 days after infection (2x10(6)/mouse) versus 0/12 in control germfree group at 13 days after infection. Colonisation level and translocation rate of C5 were significantly reduced during the three days after infection. In contrast, no reduction in faecal C5 excretion was observed in C5 infected conventional mice (1x10(8)/mouse) receiving the EM0 or JM105 cultures daily. Establishment of E coli strains, which do not display antimicrobial activity, protects germfree mice against infection and delays the establishment of C5 in the gut. Possible mechanisms of defence are discussed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          1728375
          11413110

          Comments

          Comment on this article