12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-based Event Recorder Alongside Standard Care Versus Standard Care for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Palpitations and Pre-syncope: The IPED (Investigation of Palpitations in the ED) study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patients with palpitations and pre-syncope commonly present to Emergency Departments (EDs) but underlying rhythm diagnosis is often not possible during the initial presentation. This trial compares the symptomatic rhythm detection rate of a smartphone-based event recorder (AliveCor) alongside standard care versus standard care alone, for participants presenting to the ED with palpitations and pre-syncope with no obvious cause evident at initial consultation.

          Methods

          Multi-centre open label, randomised controlled trial. Participants ≥ 16 years old presenting to 10 UK hospital EDs were included. Participants were randomised to either (a) intervention group; standard care plus the use of a smartphone-based event recorder or (b) control group; standard care alone. Primary endpoint was symptomatic rhythm detection rate at 90 days. Trial registration number NCT02783898 ( ClinicalTrials.gov).

          Findings

          Two hundred forty-three participants were recruited over an 18-month period. A symptomatic rhythm was detected at 90 days in 69 (n = 124; 55.6%; 95% CI 46.9–64.4%) participants in the intervention group versus 11 (n = 116; 9.5%; 95% CI 4.2–14.8) in the control group (RR 5.9, 95% CI 3.3–10.5; p < 0.0001). Mean time to symptomatic rhythm detection in the intervention group was 9.5 days (SD 16.1, range 0–83) versus 42.9 days (SD 16.0, range 12–66; p < 0.0001) in the control group. The commonest symptomatic rhythms detected were sinus rhythm, sinus tachycardia and ectopic beats. A symptomatic cardiac arrhythmia was detected at 90 days in 11 (n = 124; 8.9%; 95% CI 3.9–13.9%) participants in the intervention group versus 1 (n = 116; 0.9%; 95% CI 0.0–2.5%) in the control group (RR 10.3, 95% CI 1.3–78.5; p = 0.006).

          Interpretation

          Use of a smartphone-based event recorder increased the number of patients in whom an ECG was captured during symptoms over five-fold to more than 55% at 90 days. This safe, non-invasive and easy to use device should be considered part of on-going care to all patients presenting acutely with unexplained palpitations or pre-syncope.

          Funding

          This study was funded by research awards from Chest, Heart and Stroke Scotland (CHSS) and British Heart Foundation (BHF) which included funding for purchasing the devices. MR was supported by an NHS Research Scotland Career Researcher Clinician award.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias--executive summary. a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the European society of cardiology committee for practice guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias) developed in collaboration with NASPE-Heart Rhythm Society.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Performance of handheld electrocardiogram devices to detect atrial fibrillation in a cardiology and geriatric ward setting.

            To determine the usability, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness of two handheld single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) devices for atrial fibrillation (AF) screening in a hospital population with an increased risk for AF.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing the accuracy of an automated atrial fibrillation detection algorithm using smartphone technology: The iREAD Study

              The Kardia Mobile Cardiac Monitor (KMCM) detects atrial fibrillation (AF) via a handheld cardiac rhythm recorder and AF detection algorithm. The algorithm operates within predefined parameters to provide a "normal" or "possible atrial fibrillation detected" interpretation; outside of these parameters, an "unclassified" rhythm is reported. The system has been increasingly used, but its performance has not been independently tested.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                EClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                Elsevier
                2589-5370
                03 March 2019
                February 2019
                03 March 2019
                : 8
                : 37-46
                Affiliations
                [a ]Emergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK
                [b ]Edinburgh Acute Care, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, The Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK
                [c ]Department of Cardiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
                [d ]Edinburgh Clinical Research Facility, Epidemiology and Statistics Core, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
                [e ]Emergency Department, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading RG1 5AN, UK
                [f ]DREEAM - Department of Research and Education in Emergency medicine, Acute medicine and Major trauma, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
                [g ]Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chesterfield Rd, Calow, Chesterfield S44 5BL, UK
                [h ]Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB, UK
                [i ]Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Rd, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK
                [j ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK
                [k ]Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK
                [l ]Emergency Medicine Academic Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Emergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK. matthew.reed@ 123456nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk
                Article
                S2589-5370(19)30026-4
                10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.02.005
                6537555
                31193636
                e76a0a7b-41da-409f-ba1e-ecc5cf4e933f
                © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 4 November 2018
                : 7 February 2019
                : 15 February 2019
                Categories
                Research Paper

                ambulatory electrocardiography monitoring,cardiac arrhythmias,palpitations,pre-syncope

                Comments

                Comment on this article