Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Laminin and β1 Integrin Distribution in the Early Stages of Human Kidney Development

      , ,

      Nephron

      S. Karger AG

      Development, Human kidney, Laminin, β1 Integrin

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Laminin, an extracellular matrix molecule (EMM) widely expressed in the basal laminae, interacts with specific membrane receptors among which the integrin molecules are the best known. During embryo development laminin is the first synthesized EMM and plays a significant role in the morphogenesis of organs in which epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and branching take place. The present study describes the distribution of laminin and of β1 integrin receptors during the very early stages of human kidney development. The observations were carried out on paraffin sections of human embryos ranging between the 4th and the 7th gestational week. Laminin was detected within the basement membranes of mesonephric duct, vesicles, glomerular vessels and celomic epithelium. The metanephric anlage reacted with anti-laminin immunoglobulins in the basement membrane underlying the ampullae and in few blastemic cap cells. Low levels of β1 integrin reactivity were found in both the mesonephric and metanephric structures. This study provides for the first time data about the distribution of laminin and β1 integrin in the early stages of human renal organogenesis suggesting a key role for these molecules in the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions necessary for kidney development.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Integrins, Oncogenes, and Anchorage Independence

          The ability of cancer cells to proliferate in the absence of adhesion to extracellular matrix (ECM)1 proteins, termed anchorage independence of growth, correlates closely with tumorigenicity in animal models (14). This property of cancer cells presumably reflects the tendency of tumor cells to survive and grow in inappropriate locations in vivo. Such incorrect localization, as occurs in invasion and metastasis, is the characteristic that distinguishes malignant from benign tumors (31). Great progress has been made in the last 20 years toward understanding how growth is controlled in normal cells and how oncogenes usurp these controls. Yet studies on how oncogenes (or loss of tumor suppressors) overcome the mechanisms that govern cellular location have lagged considerably. The finding that integrins transduce signals that influence intracellular growth regulatory pathways provided some insight into anchorage dependence. Available evidence indicates that integrin-dependent signals mediate the growth requirement for cell adhesion to ECM proteins. Our understanding of integrin signaling has now reached a stage that connections to oncogenesis are becoming clear, enabling us to place a number of proto-oncogenes and oncogenes with respect to their adhesion dependence or independence. While many details of molecular mechanisms remain to be elucidated, sufficient information is now available to propose a general framework for how oncogenes lead to anchorage-independent growth. Integrin Signaling Integrins transduce a great many signals that impinge upon growth regulatory pathways (for review see 3, 37, 44). These include activation of tyrosine kinases such as focal adhesion kinase (FAK), pp60src, and c-Abl; serine-threonine kinases such as MAP kinases, jun kinase (JNK), and protein kinase C (PKC); intracellular ions such as protons (pH) and calcium; the small GTPase Rho; and lipid mediators such as phosphoinositides, diacylglycerol, and arachidonic acid metabolites. Integrin-mediated adhesion also regulates expression of immediate-early genes such as c-fos and key cell cycle events such as kinase activity of cyclin–cdk complexes and phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb). It is striking that extensive investigations into integrin-dependent pathways have revealed no novel signaling pathways. Integrins appear to regulate the same pathways that have been identified in studies of oncogenes and growth factors. Mediators such as c-src, phosphoinositides, protein kinase C, and so on were well established as participants in cytokine or growth factor–dependent signaling. Even FAK, p130cas, and paxillin, which localize to focal adhesions and mediate integrin signaling, connect downstream to known growth factor–regulated pathways such as phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase (for FAK) and MAP kinase (for FAK, paxillin, and p130cas). Thus, integrins and growth factors regulate the same pathways. This fact then raises the question of how these pathways are jointly controlled by both cell adhesion to ECM proteins and soluble factors. Convergence of Integrin and Growth Factor Pathways In many if not most instances where the combined effects of soluble factors and integrins have been examined, synergistic activation has been observed. Cell adhesion has been shown to greatly enhance autophosphorylation of the EGF and PDGF receptors in response to their cognate ligands (10, 23). In cells where growth factor receptor function is not affected by ECM, activation of PKC via hydrolysis of phosphoinositides depends on cell adhesion (22, 34). Cell adhesion regulates transmission of signals to MAP kinase by altering the activation of MEK or Raf (20, 30). There is also evidence that activation of PI 3-kinase and downstream components such as AKT and p70RSK in response to growth factors depends on cell adhesion (17, 18). Thus, at least three major signaling pathways controlled by growth factors also require cell adhesion (Fig. 1). In the cases listed above, the combined output from integrins and growth factors is synergistic. Thus, the response to either cell adhesion or growth factors alone is quite low in most cases, while both stimuli together give a strong response. These results imply that integrins and growth factor receptors act upon different points in the pathway. For example, in the case of inositol lipid hydrolysis, integrins control the synthesis and supply of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, whereas growth factor receptors control the activity of phospholipase C (22). Many other instances of synergism have been observed. Integrin αvβ3 coprecipitates with IRS-1 after stimulation with insulin, and though the mechanism of the cooperation is unclear, this coprecipitation correlates with enhanced mitogenesis in response to insulin (39). Leukocyte activation in response to cytokines and antigens is also enhanced by cell adhesion, and in several cases, cell activation correlates with synergistic effects on protein tyrosine phosphorylation (for review see 32). Expression of early cell cycle genes such as c-fos and c-myc is also stimulated by both cell adhesion and growth factors (12). Gene expression driven by the fos promoter shows strongly synergistic activation by integrin-mediated adhesion and growth factors (41). Later cell cycle events such as activation of G1 cyclin–cdk complexes and Rb phosphorylation require both cell adhesion to ECM and growth factors (for review see 3). There are also numerous examples in which complex cellular functions such as migration, proliferation, gene expression, or differentiation require stimulation by both integrin-mediated adhesion and soluble factors (for review see 1, 6, 13). Implications for Oncogenes The pathways in Fig. 1 can be represented in a general way as shown in Fig. 2 A. This figure displays a basic conceptual framework for considering effects of integrins and growth factors on cell functions. Because oncogenes are points on normal growth regulatory pathways that are constitutively activated by mutation or overexpression, one can make predictions about the effects of oncogenes on cell growth based on the placement of the corresponding proto-oncogenes with respect to the integrin and growth factor receptor pathways. For example, constitutive activation of a step after convergence of integrin and growth factor pathways should bypass the requirements for both adhesion and serum, i.e., it should induce both serum- and anchorage-independent proliferation. Oncogenes such as Ras, src, or SV40 large T antigen appear to fit this description. On the other hand, constitutive activation of a step on the integrin arm of the pathway before convergence should give rise to anchorage-independent but serum-dependent growth. A number of oncogenes have recently been found to fit this description. Activation of Rho leads to anchorage-independent but serum-dependent growth (38), consistent with results suggesting that Rho mediates integrin-dependent signaling (4, 8, 29). The Rho family protein Cdc42 gives similar effects (26), and recent work suggests that Cdc42 is activated by integrins and plays an important role in cell spreading and cytoskeletal organization (Price, L., J. Leng, M. Schwartz, and G. Bokoch, manuscript submitted for publication; Clark, E., W. King, J. Brugge, M. Symons, and R. Hynes, manuscript in preparation). An activated variant of FAK was also shown to induce anchorage-dependent survival and growth of MDCK cells without altering their dependence on serum (15). Overexpression of the 70-kD integrin-linked kinase, a protein that was found to bind directly to integrin cytoplasmic domains, also induces anchorage-independent but serum-dependent growth (27). The Abl tyrosine kinase provides a particularly interesting example. Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is caused by the Philadelphia chromosomal translocation, which fuses Bcr to the NH2 terminus of c-Abl to produce the Bcr-Abl oncogene (for review see 40). CML cells exit the bone marrow and enter the circulation prematurely, where they proliferate excessively. Thus the behavior of CML cells is reminiscent of anchorage-independent growth in vitro. Indeed, expression of Bcr-Abl in 3T3 cells induced anchorage-independent but serum-dependent growth (28). Consistent with these results, c-Abl localization and tyrosine kinase activity are regulated by integrin-mediated cell adhesion (19). Thus, at least some of the behavior of Bcr-Abl can be understood as constitutive activation of c-Abl's adhesion-dependent functions. Conversely, one would predict that constitutive stimulation of growth factor pathways would be mitogenic but not necessarily oncogenic. Such mutations might give rise to benign tumors, where cells show accelerated growth but their structure and behavior remain relatively normal (31). Production of autocrine growth factors is a prime candidate for effects of this sort. In support of this model, ectopic expression of growth factors in vivo induces benign hyperplasia in several animal models (7, 21, 33); in some cases neoplasia results but occurs at a later stage and arises focally, indicating a requirement for additional mutations (33). In vitro, autocrine growth factor expression can also be associated with accelerated or serum-independent growth of otherwise normal cells (24). Circumstances where autocrine expression of growth factors lead to anchorage independence are discussed below. The Plot Thickens The conceptual scheme shown in Fig. 2 is simple, but signaling pathways may not be. The proto-oncogene c-src, for example, associates both with growth factor receptors and with FAK (2, 9, 43). Oncogenic variants of src induce tyrosine phosphorylation both of focal adhesion proteins and proteins involved in growth factor receptor signaling (16). Thus, a multifunctional tyrosine kinase like src might phosphorylate substrates that independently induce anchorage and serum independence. Second, incorrect targeting or compartmentalization of a signaling protein may result in novel functions that do not occur under normal conditions. For example, attachment of a membrane localization sequence to c-Abl (as in v-Abl or mutant forms of Bcr-Abl) creates a much more potent oncogene that strongly induces both anchorage- and serum-independent growth (11, 28), most likely by phosphorylating substrates that are normally inaccessible. Third, very strong activation of a pathway may overcome a partial blockade. For example, loss of integrin- mediated adhesion inhibits the activation of MAP kinase by serum or active forms of Ras or Raf by 75–90% (20, 30). However, oncogenic Ras or Raf activate the pathway two to three times more strongly than serum. Hence, ERK activation in suspended Ras- or Raf-transformed cells is ∼40% of that obtained in adherent cells treated with serum. These oncogenes can therefore induce a significant degree of anchorage independence. It should be noted, however, that the rate of growth of suspended transformed cells is still much slower than when they are adherent. An obvious question stemming from this model is why do oncogenes that derive from growth factors or receptors sometimes induce complete transformation of fibroblast cell lines. For example, expression of v-sis, which codes for PDGF-B, promotes growth in soft agar, even though addition of PDGF to the medium does not (25, 42). This question may be resolved by the observation that v-sis stimulation of the PDGF receptor in an intracellular compartment is crucial to its transforming activity (5). This result makes the prediction that intracellular receptors might evade some of the adhesion-dependent controls discussed above, thereby enabling v-sis to stimulate growth of nonadherent cells. Summary and Conclusions Some of the earliest experiments identifying signals from integrins showed that oncogenes were able to activate these pathways in suspended cells (16, 35, 36). Thus, anchorage-independent growth of tumor cells could be seen as a consequence of anchorage-independent activation of specific pathways. Recent advances have shown that this view is basically correct but have considerably enriched our understanding. Integrins and growth factor receptors regulate the same pathways, in many instances in such a way that ligation of both is required for activation of downstream events. Oncogenes that constitutively activate integrin-dependent events before convergence with growth factor pathways should induce anchorage-independent growth without affecting serum dependence. Conversely, activation of growth factor–dependent events before convergence should induce accelerated proliferation without causing anchorage independence. And constitutive activation of events after convergence should result in both anchorage and serum independence. These predictions have been tested in several instances. Rho, FAK, Cdc42, ILK, and c-Abl have been implicated in integrin signaling, and activation or overexpression of these proteins induces anchorage-independent but serum-dependent growth. Activation of MAP kinase, PI 3-kinase, expression from the c-fos promoter, kinase activity of cyclin D- and cyclin E–cdk complexes, and Rb phosphorylation all depend on both adhesion and growth factors, and oncogenes such as v-fos, v-Ras , v-src, and SV40 large T that constitutively activate these pathways induce both anchorage and serum independence. That these oncogenes are potent transforming agents may be due in part to their ability to overcome cellular requirements for both anchorage and growth factors. The majority of deaths from cancer are due not to primary tumors but to secondary tumors that arise via invasion and metastasis. The ability of tumor cells to survive and grow in inappropriate environments therefore lies very much at the core of the problem. This behavior is reflected in vitro by anchorage-independent growth. Constitutive activation of integrin-dependent signaling events by oncogenes provides a molecular explanation for the link between growth and adhesion.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Domains of laminin.

            Extracellular matrix molecules are often very large and made up of several independent domains, frequently with autonomous activities. Laminin is no exception. A number of globular and rod-like domains can be identified in laminin and its isoforms by sequence analysis as well as by electron microscopy. Here we present the structure-function relations in laminins by examination of their individual domains. This approach to viewing laminin is based on recent results from several laboratories. First, some mutations in laminin genes that cause disease have affected single laminin domains, and some laminin isoforms lack particular domains. These mutants and isoforms are informative with regard to the activities of the mutated and missing domains. These mutants and isoforms are informative with regard to the activities of the mutated and missing domains. Second, laminin-like domains have now been found in a number of other proteins, and data on these proteins may be informative in terms of structure-function relationships in laminin. Finally, a large body of data has accumulated on the structure and activities of proteolytic fragments, recombinant fragments, and synthetic peptides from laminin. The proposed activities of these domains can now be confirmed and extended by in vivo experiments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Laminin receptors.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NEF
                Nephron
                10.1159/issn.1660-8151
                Nephron
                S. Karger AG
                1660-8151
                2235-3186
                1999
                March 1999
                26 February 1999
                : 81
                : 3
                : 289-295
                Affiliations
                Chair of Histology and General Embryology,Department of Human Morphology and Applied Biology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Pisa University, Pisa, Italy
                Article
                45295 Nephron 1999;81:289–295
                10.1159/000045295
                10050083
                © 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 3, References: 28, Pages: 7
                Product
                Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/45295
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Cardiovascular Medicine, Nephrology

                Human kidney, Laminin, β1 Integrin, Development

                Comments

                Comment on this article