BRCA1/2 germline mutations predispose to breast cancer (gBRCA-BC) by impairing homologous recombination (HR) causing genomic instability. HR also repairs DNA lesions caused by platinums and PARP inhibitors. Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC) harbour sub-populations with BRCA1/2 mutations, hypothesised to be especially platinum sensitive. Putative “BRCAness” subgroups may also be especially platinum sensitive. We assessed carboplatin and mechanistically distinct docetaxel in a phase-III trial in unselected advanced TNBC. A pre-specified programme enabled biomarker-treatment interaction analyses in gBRCA-BC and “BRCAness” subgroups: tumour BRCA1 methylation; BRCA1 mRNA-low; HR deficiency mutational signatures and basal phenotypes. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). In the unselected population (376 patients; 188 carboplatin, 188 docetaxel) carboplatin was not more active than docetaxel (ORR: 31.4v34.0; p=0.66). In contrast in patients with gBRCA-BC carboplatin had double the ORR compared to docetaxel (68%v33%), test for biomarker-treatment interaction (p=0.01). No treatment interaction was observed for BRCA1 methylation, BRCA1 mRNA-low status or a Myriad-HRD mutation signature assay. Significant treatment interaction with basal-like subtype was driven by high docetaxel response in the non-basal subgroup. Patients with advanced TNBC benefit from BRCA1/2 mutation characterization, but not BRCA1 methylation or Myriad-HRD analysis, informing platinum choices. Basal-like gene expression analysis may also influence treatment choices.