127
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    3
    shares

      To submit to this journal, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      The “Normative Forces” of Difference: Ecology, Economy and Society during Cattle Plagues in the Eighteenth Century

      research-article
      Journal for the History of Environment and Society
      Brepols Publishers

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          One of the recurring themes in the public perception of containment policies during the current COVID-19 pandemic are the supposedly uneven and everchanging measures taken up by international, national and local authorities. This is especially the case in countries with a federal structure, like Germany. Not surprisingly, historical containment policies and strategies of coping with epidemics have been varied too and were also discussed intensely. This short essay will analyse the communication between farmers, artisans, merchants, physicians and local as well as higher level administration during outbreaks of cattle plague in eighteenth century Northern Germany / Denmark. The duchies of Schleswig and Holstein, geographically located between the Baltic and the North Sea, are especially well suited for such a study because of their characteristically distinct regional differences in geomorphology and the varied economic practices, property rights and political organisation which directly or indirectly resulted from one another. Environmental factors clearly influenced administrative measures as well as public responses or demands regarding these policies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Ecologies of Beef: Eighteenth-Century Epizootics and the Environmental History of Early Modern Europe

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Rinderpest and mainstream infectious disease concepts in the eighteenth century.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Health Passes, Print and Public Health in Early Modern Europe

              Early modern governments produced a wide range of printed texts as part of their public health strategies, including broadsheets, flysheets and pamphlets. This study focuses on health passes, a form of ephemeral print which asserted that the bearer had travelled from a city which was free from plague. Passes were printed forms with textual, iconographic and material features which sought to enhance their authority, credibility and usability. Completed forms provide evidence of their users and of how passes were adapted in response to particular perceived threats. This study examines passes issued by a large number of European cities to argue for the development of a shared European culture of public health print, inspired by recognition of print’s persuasiveness, efficiency and capacity to transcend the boundaries of place.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                064_jour
                JHES
                jhes
                Journal for the History of Environment and Society
                Brepols Publishers
                2506-6730
                2506-6749
                January 2020
                : 5
                : 91-100
                Article
                10.1484/J.JHES.5.122466
                e796583d-fdd4-42c7-9529-9f9796663727

                Open-access

                History

                Agricultural ecology,Environmental change,Environmental studies,General social science,General environmental science,Urban, Rural & Regional economics

                Comments

                Comment on this article