5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Peering in: youth perspectives on Health Promoting Schools and youth engagement in Nova Scotia, Canada

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Health Promoting Schools (HPS) is a whole-school approach that shapes the conditions necessary to support student health and well-being. Youth engagement is recognized as key to HPS implementation, yet research related to the involvement of youth voice in school health promotion initiatives is limited. The purpose of this study was to understand youth perspectives on HPS and school youth engagement. Ten youth (grades 9–10, ages 14–16) were trained as peer researchers using a Youth Participatory Action Research approach. The peer researchers interviewed 23 of their peers (grades 7–10, ages 12–16) on perspectives related to HPS and school youth engagement. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and data were analysed using inductive ‘codebook’ thematic analysis. Themes related to a healthy school community were mapped onto the pillars of HPS: (i) Social and Physical Environment, (ii) Teaching and Learning, (iii) Partnerships and Services and (iv) School Policies. Participants placed more importance on the social and physical environment of the school including respect, inclusivity, supportive relationships and the design of spaces. Key factors for youth engagement were: (i) safe and supportive spaces, (ii) passion and interest, (iii) using their voice, (iv) power dynamics, (v) accessibility and (vi) awareness. With recognition that youth engagement is a crucial part of HPS, this work provides relevant and applicable information on areas of the healthy school community that are important to youth, and if/how they are meaningfully engaged in school decision-making.

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing

          In the course of our supervisory work over the years we have noticed that qualitative research tends to evoke a lot of questions and worries, so-called frequently asked questions (FAQs). This series of four articles intends to provide novice researchers with practical guidance for conducting high-quality qualitative research in primary care. By ‘novice’ we mean Master’s students and junior researchers, as well as experienced quantitative researchers who are engaging in qualitative research for the first time. This series addresses their questions and provides researchers, readers, reviewers and editors with references to criteria and tools for judging the quality of qualitative research papers. The first article provides an introduction to this series. The second article focused on context, research questions and designs. The third article focused on sampling, data collection and analysis. This fourth article addresses FAQs about trustworthiness and publishing. Quality criteria for all qualitative research are credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Reflexivity is an integral part of ensuring the transparency and quality of qualitative research. Writing a qualitative research article reflects the iterative nature of the qualitative research process: data analysis continues while writing. A qualitative research article is mostly narrative and tends to be longer than a quantitative paper, and sometimes requires a different structure. Editors essentially use the criteria: is it new, is it true, is it relevant? An effective cover letter enhances confidence in the newness, trueness and relevance, and explains why your study required a qualitative design. It provides information about the way you applied quality criteria or a checklist, and you can attach the checklist to the manuscript.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ‘Voice’ is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child

            S Lundy (2007)
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Codebook Development for Team-Based Qualitative Analysis

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Health Promot Int
                Health Promot Int
                heapro
                Health Promotion International
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0957-4824
                1460-2245
                June 2022
                21 July 2022
                21 July 2022
                : 37
                : 3
                : daac081
                Affiliations
                Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Dalhousie University , 5968 College Street, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
                Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University , 1318 Robie Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3E2, Canada
                Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University , 1318 Robie Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3E2, Canada
                Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University , 1318 Robie Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3E2, Canada
                Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University , 1318 Robie Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3E2, Canada
                Division of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children’s Health and Medical Centre, University of Nebraska Medical Center , 8200 Dodge Street, Omaha, NE 68114, USA
                Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University , 1318 Robie Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3E2, Canada
                School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University , PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. E-mail: Julia.kontak@ 123456dal.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9104-0678
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2951-4542
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7260-8611
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2146-4448
                Article
                daac081
                10.1093/heapro/daac081
                9302890
                35862775
                e7c728ab-ad8f-4d37-864c-015d81556375
                © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: Public Health Agency of Canada to the UpLift Partnership;
                Funded by: Canadian Institute for Health Research;
                Award ID: 175916
                Categories
                Article
                AcademicSubjects/MED00860

                Public health
                comprehensive school health,school health,health promotion,youth participation,health education

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log